02.07.2014 Views

Agenda - pdf - Selby District Council

Agenda - pdf - Selby District Council

Agenda - pdf - Selby District Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mr Chris<br />

Vertigans<br />

Mr Chris<br />

Vertigans<br />

Mr Chris<br />

Vertigans<br />

Mr Chris<br />

Vertigans<br />

Mr Chris<br />

Vertigans<br />

Mr Chris<br />

Vertigans<br />

Mr Chris<br />

Vertigans<br />

Mr Chris<br />

Vertigans<br />

Mr Chris<br />

Vertigans<br />

Mr Chris<br />

Vertigans<br />

Summary: N Duffield WAS a farming community<br />

Summary mentions brick construction – should also include roof materials, doors<br />

and windows, scale and proportion etc.<br />

Intro/history: Junction marked BY<br />

Intro/history: road realigned SOUTH of the village<br />

Intro/history: “landscape is very flat”. Very important local specific statement<br />

which needs to be read in context with the generalised comments further in the<br />

document<br />

Intro/history: Para 5 – ambiguous - rewrite<br />

Intro/history: Para 6 – something not quite right here with these 2 sentences.<br />

Intro/history: Para 7: this is true about no obvious original settlement, but the<br />

document states elsewhere about the 3 main roads so it doesn’t tie up<br />

Intro/history: Character areas bullets: should read “is blurred” not “blurs”<br />

2 charcater areas is incorrect as the “green” one includes at least 2 recent large<br />

residential developments plus one smaller one.<br />

The suggestion is that the green area contains everything that is “correct and<br />

proper” with the village and the opposite for the blue shaded areas<br />

Agree – make change<br />

All elements are important, but this is a simple<br />

introduction summary. The list of features is<br />

explored on the pages that follow for a fuller<br />

summary of the village character.<br />

Typographical error.<br />

Typographical error.<br />

agree<br />

Agree – explain what “grown a lot” means<br />

Agree – more detail/context/explanation<br />

required<br />

Agree – amend to make this clearer regarding<br />

the 3 main routes growing.<br />

Agree – make change<br />

The chronology of the development is irrelevant<br />

– it is broad character that is important and the<br />

developments broadly follow the “traditional”<br />

style so they may be in the green area.<br />

The VDS sets out the existing character and it<br />

infers that the green is the more local style.<br />

However, the VDS is not judging what is right<br />

or wrong, only setting out what the local<br />

character actually is.<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!