02.07.2014 Views

Agenda - pdf - Selby District Council

Agenda - pdf - Selby District Council

Agenda - pdf - Selby District Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fernyhough<br />

Mr Chris<br />

Vertigans<br />

Mr Chris<br />

Vertigans<br />

Mr Chris<br />

Vertigans<br />

Mr Chris<br />

Vertigans<br />

Mr Chris<br />

Vertigans<br />

Mr Chris<br />

Vertigans<br />

Mr Chris<br />

Vertigans<br />

Mr Chris<br />

Vertigans<br />

wary of these developers and look in to their methods and reasons for building<br />

before N Duffield is spoiled forever and the generations who have lived here and<br />

cared for it are pushed into the background.<br />

Para 1.0: should be “FROM”<br />

Para 1.1: add in “social ideology” and “external pressure from interested parties”<br />

1.3: Where in the VDS does it mention design standards or qualities for doors<br />

and windows and not to mention glazing.<br />

Para 1.3: suggest adding “building juxtapositions”<br />

Para 1.3 “Size” – does this refer to plot size or house size or both?<br />

Para 1.3 “Should not copy old buildings” – what exactly should not be copied?<br />

Para 1.4: “where design is not respectful to the village, the VDS can be used as<br />

evidence to justify the refusal of planning permission” I support this in principle,<br />

however if the document is to be used as the basis to refuse PP the SDC better<br />

make sure that it has it absolutely watertight and offers or suggests what exactly<br />

constitutes good and bad design without any ambiguity. For this reason I believe<br />

that this consultation draft needs further work and development to enhance the<br />

design content and include “village specific” reference, elements and narrative<br />

text.<br />

Para 1.5: “Early discussion” refer to the option for pre-application meeting and<br />

benefits of this.<br />

Agree Typographical error<br />

Unnecessary as it is a general explanation of<br />

how house building has evolved, not an<br />

exhaustive list of the reasons for it. Suggested<br />

additions do not strengthen the VDS.<br />

This is a generic introduction to all VDS<br />

documents. As such it is intended to explain<br />

that the VDS may be applied to major or minor<br />

development. It is not specific to this VDS.<br />

Agree – a useful addition<br />

It refers to all proportions – plot, building, and<br />

details on each building.<br />

The VDS seeks to encourage an understanding<br />

of local character, but does not seek to make<br />

new development a slavish copy of historic<br />

designs.<br />

Support welcome. No suggestion for additional<br />

text included, so no additions may be made.<br />

The text already refers to early discussion with<br />

the LPA. Pre-application meeting is not the<br />

only option.<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!