02.07.2014 Views

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

carried out in accordance <strong>with</strong> the measures set out in the Flood Risk<br />

Assessment.<br />

2.14.20 Having taken into account the impact on flooding as set out above it is<br />

considered that the proposals satisfy the sequential <strong>and</strong> exceptions<br />

test <strong>and</strong> demonstrates that the development would be appropriately<br />

flood resilient <strong>and</strong> resistant, residual flood risk can be safely managed<br />

<strong>and</strong> demonstrates that flood risk elsewhere should not be increased by<br />

the proposals. The proposals are therefore considered acceptable in<br />

terms of flood risk in accordance <strong>with</strong> Policy SH/1B of the <strong>Selby</strong> <strong>District</strong><br />

Local Plan, Policy ENV1 of the RSS <strong>and</strong> the requirements of the<br />

NPPF.<br />

Drainage<br />

2.14.21 Policy ENV1 of the Local Plan outlines that in considering proposals<br />

the <strong>District</strong> Council will take account of:<br />

3) The capacity of local services <strong>and</strong> infrastructure to serve the<br />

proposal, or the arrangements to be made for upgrading, or<br />

providing services <strong>and</strong> infrastructure;<br />

2.14.22 At the site specific level, SHB/1B states that proposals must make<br />

provision for:<br />

4) A surface water drainage scheme.<br />

5) Reinforcement of the water supply main from South Milford<br />

pumping station.<br />

2.14.23 In terms of drainage then the “Approved Development Brief” for the<br />

wider site from 2003, notes that surface water should drain to the onsite<br />

watercourses. Furthermore flow attenuation should be utilised,<br />

including balancing areas, which should form an integral part of the<br />

existing site water features, where this is compatible <strong>with</strong> their existing<br />

drainage function <strong>and</strong> that where SUDS is not feasible, filtered surface<br />

water run off should be discharged directly to watercourses. The<br />

Development Brief also notes that foul water should be pumped to the<br />

Yorkshire Water pumping station on Moor Lane <strong>and</strong> that although this<br />

would result in an increase in the volume of treated effluent discharge<br />

from the works “the impact of this has been assessed <strong>and</strong> the receiving<br />

watercourse has capacity to accommodate these increased flows”, The<br />

Brief also states that the “detailed design should seek to enhance the<br />

l<strong>and</strong>scape <strong>and</strong> ecological value of the water features.”.<br />

2.14.24 Yorkshire Water have been consulted <strong>and</strong> they have confirmed that a<br />

water supply can be provided to the site <strong>and</strong> that they have no<br />

objections to the methods of foul <strong>and</strong> surface water disposal subject to<br />

conditions <strong>and</strong> informatives being attached to any permission granted.<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!