02.07.2014 Views

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.9.33 NYCC Highways have confirmed that as the applicant proposes to<br />

provide a surfaced footpath / cycleway link from the development to the<br />

existing site which is being developed from Moor Lane.<br />

2.9.34 On this basis subject to delivery of the links via condition <strong>and</strong> S106<br />

mechanisms as part of the development of the site then <strong>and</strong> the<br />

improvements to the linkages to the from the development to the<br />

Phase 1 development on Moor Lane, which will require some<br />

improvements to the public right of way, then the scheme is acceptable<br />

<strong>and</strong> accords <strong>with</strong> Policy.<br />

Car Parking <strong>with</strong>in the Scheme<br />

2.9.35 The detailed site layout will be considered as part of the required<br />

reserved matters submissions should outline consent be granted.<br />

2.9.36 The submitted Design & Access Statement sets out under Section 5<br />

under “Amount <strong>and</strong> Layout” that parking provision will be in line <strong>with</strong><br />

the Local Plan policies, through a variety of solutions from integral<br />

garages, garages <strong>with</strong>in the curtilage of the dwelling or parking courts.<br />

The indicative plans demonstrate that sufficient parking can be<br />

achieved <strong>with</strong>in the site in order to comply <strong>with</strong> policy.<br />

2.9.37 NYCC Highways have confirmed that the local Highway Authority's<br />

current parking design guide still refers to maximum parking st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

<strong>and</strong> they underst<strong>and</strong> this document was also adopted by <strong>Selby</strong> DC. In<br />

line <strong>with</strong> national guidance, maximum st<strong>and</strong>ards are no longer<br />

considered appropriate for new residential development. Parking levels<br />

should therefore be agreed <strong>with</strong> the Local Highways Authority (as in<br />

NYCC) <strong>and</strong> the Local Planning Authority rather than applying the<br />

'maximum' parking st<strong>and</strong>ards in the existing guidance”.<br />

2.9.38 On this basis it is considered that delivery of detailed car parking<br />

arrangements can be confirmed at the reserved matters stage as part<br />

of the layout <strong>and</strong> as such the scheme is acceptable.<br />

Car Parking in the Village Centre<br />

2.9.39 Objectors have stated that there is a lack of parking in the village<br />

centre which is already constrained. The developers have not<br />

proposed any contribution towards improvements to the provision of<br />

car parking in the town centre as part of the submission.<br />

2.9.40 NYCC Highways <strong>and</strong> SDC Planning Officers have reviewed the lack of<br />

such improvements <strong>and</strong> consider that the site is in a sustainable<br />

location so people will not always drive to the village centre. As such it<br />

is not considered reasonable to require the developer to enhance or<br />

contribute to the enhancement of parking provision in the village<br />

centre.<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!