02.07.2014 Views

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• High school cannot support more pupils <strong>and</strong> the school is old,<br />

needs modernising.<br />

• Road to Athelston Primary School as previously promised by the<br />

developers at a consultation meeting held in March 2012. The<br />

developers have proposed building a new access road onto Low<br />

Street for the primary school, but no planning application has been<br />

submitted <strong>and</strong> traffic implications of this have not been tested or<br />

even discussed.<br />

Carbon Reduction<br />

• Should outline planning consent be given SDC should make the<br />

developers aware at this stage that the building regulations <strong>and</strong> the<br />

government’s policy, including the Communities <strong>and</strong> Local<br />

Government Carbon Reduction Delivery Plan to provide new build<br />

zero carbon homes by 2016 will be vigorously pursued.<br />

Alignment & Prematurity of Planning <strong>Applications</strong><br />

• Alignment of plans 2012/0399/EIA & 2012/0400/EIA should be<br />

aligned so that objections can be linked together. As it st<strong>and</strong>s, you<br />

are required to object to both sets of plans. Only objecting to one,<br />

might lead to one set of plans getting the go ahead because it<br />

appears no one has any problems/objections to it. All these planning<br />

applications should be aligned to each other to provide residents<br />

<strong>with</strong> a true picture of what is about to impact on our Village<br />

• Reasons behind the premature objection is that both sets of plans<br />

do not include anything about new access<br />

Local Economy<br />

• The younger people in the village do not seem to see Sherburn in<br />

their long term future, there is nothing for them to do, no leisure<br />

facilities of note <strong>and</strong> certainly few if any job opportunities.<br />

Other matters<br />

• developer has breached planning control in the past on other sites<br />

<strong>with</strong>in Sherburn<br />

• existing skate park is too busy for children to use<br />

• there are other sites in Sherburn which could share the burden of<br />

new home building which are more suitable than those identified<br />

• Reduction in house prices<br />

• At the end of the Moor lane site an ab<strong>and</strong>oned mess was left for a<br />

number of years which has been littered <strong>with</strong> empty portacabins<br />

<strong>and</strong> assorted machinery <strong>and</strong> building materials. This was cleared<br />

up as of early March 2012. An access road has been built from the<br />

Moor Lane site to the bottom part of the field complete <strong>with</strong> hefty<br />

side rails which one can only conclude is to facilitate trucks full of<br />

materials for the duration of the building process if application<br />

2012/0399 is successful<br />

• The proposed development period is far too long <strong>and</strong> given that<br />

these developers have already blighted Sherburn for 4 years, to<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!