02.07.2014 Views

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• It would appear that the developers have once again submitted<br />

applications to encompass the total amount of dwellings to be built<br />

in Sherburn until 2027 in these three submissions. The total<br />

amount being that, that is likely to be defined <strong>and</strong> ratified in the<br />

emerging Core Strategy. Not<strong>with</strong>st<strong>and</strong>ing the newly published<br />

NPPF which indicates that overprovision is something to be viewed<br />

upon positively, I believe that SDC, on behalf of their residents<br />

could challenge the amount to be built (in the short term i.e. before<br />

2020) as unsustainable, unreasonable <strong>and</strong> unnecessary.<br />

• When the original Core strategy for this area was discussed <strong>and</strong><br />

developed around 7 or 8 years ago, it was thought that there would<br />

be a need for further housing due to the growth in jobs in the Area,<br />

this has plainly not occurred .If anything the number of jobs<br />

available to people in Sherburn <strong>and</strong> its immediate confines is less<br />

than it was back then. Linpac closed completely <strong>and</strong> the planned<br />

400 jobs from Optare never materialised for Sherburn residents to<br />

my knowledge, Gasgoine Wood plans have never materialised.<br />

Highways, Access <strong>and</strong> Transportation<br />

• restricted number of parking spaces near services in Sherburn<br />

• traffic passes through housing estates <strong>and</strong> centre of village,<br />

commuters use Fairway <strong>and</strong> The Eversleys as a ‘cut-through’<br />

• Roads are not wide enough<br />

• Safety concerns <strong>with</strong> the additional level of traffic that the<br />

development would generate<br />

• If development is approved should be accessed via Low Street or<br />

A162 by-pass.<br />

• No indication when the link road will be built<br />

• Urgent infrastructure required <strong>and</strong> adequate roads to the<br />

development<br />

• Sherburn-in-Elmet already has a road accident record nearly twice<br />

the national average<br />

• Low Street is heavily used by school children on their way to/ from<br />

the two nearby schools. Proposal is close to the New Lane/Low<br />

Street junction which is used by HGV traffic <strong>and</strong> which had a history<br />

of accidents leading to it being listed as an accident black spot<br />

• The plans indicate that new bus stops are to be provided on Low<br />

Street, but not pull-ins, so buses stopping <strong>and</strong> starting will be an<br />

additional hazard<br />

• The school run forms 24% of morning rush hour traffic (Dept. for<br />

Transport figures) but the Transport Assessment submitted <strong>with</strong><br />

these applications does not consider it. With traffic <strong>and</strong> pedestrians<br />

from 598 homes heading towards two schools on the opposite side<br />

of New Lane then the additional hazard will be considerable,<br />

particularly on a dark, wet winter morning when the there will be a<br />

surge in the use of cars for the school run<br />

• The Transport Assessment submitted contains several “optimistic”<br />

assumptions <strong>and</strong> some which are just plain wrong. Must insist that<br />

there is an independent appraisal of the capacity of the traffic lights<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!