Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ... Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

02.07.2014 Views

In terms of location, there is no doubt that the proposed rebuild would be further away from the listed building when compared to the existing structure. At its nearest points the nursing home is presently between 11m (single storey) and 13m (two storeys) from the Church. The proposed redevelopment, at its nearest point to the west facing church gable, would be 22m away. The 35m distance referred to by the applicants is taken from the main entrance. It can be agreed that the opportunity for views around the listed church and the feeling of separation between it and the proposed development would be an improvement upon the present situation. However, historically the church was physically linked to the main Scarthingwell Hall, and that outriggers attached to the hall wrapped around the building in a similar manner to the present nursing home. As such, the proposed open aspect of the church would not reflect the historic layout and grain of the built environment around the church. Furthermore the buildings comprising the existing nursing home are rather low. These would be replaced by building that are considerably higher and have an increased scale and mass. This would be exacerbated by the higher ground level of the nursing home site to the chapel. The overall effect is such that the proposed new building would compete with the listed building and in this respect the proposal would detract from the setting of the listed building. In addition to the above it is noted that the design of the existing nursing home is ‘modern’ and of rather poor quality. Notwithstanding this there is no presumption that new buildings should attempt to create a pastiche of the former buildings that they replace or that they should be traditional appearance per se. Current conservation philosophy recognises that building design, structure and form has changed throughout time and expects that new buildings should be of their time. There is an emphasis on good quality design, including matter of materials and scale. The proposed nursing home would use artificial stone, by virtue of its scale would compete with listed building and is of indifferent appearance. On balance it is considered that the proposed scheme would have at worse a neutral effect and at best a marginal improvement and therefore would preserve the setting of the listed building. As such the proposal would not be contrary to the guidance contained within PPG15: Planning and the Historic Environment. 4. Effect Upon the Historic Park The historic park designation is a local designation and the effect of proposed development on a park or its setting is a material consideration. Policy ENV16 would only allow development if the appearance, setting, character or amenity of the park would not be harmed. The review of the Park in 1998 concluded that not enough of the historic layout survived to merit inclusion in the national list, it was recorded however that the interestingly shaped pond and some of the old trees, for example, form an interesting component of the historic landscape (English Heritage 1998). 372

The Landscape Assessment of the district prepared in 1999 to support the emerging Local Plan refers to the number of country mansions in this area and Scarthingwell, although the local manor associated has gone, makes a distinctive contribution to the landscape. Policy ENV9 of the RSS would seek to conserve historic parks and gardens, to enhance their character and reinforce distinctiveness. The local plan policy is intended to ensure that the remaining parkland is protected. In this respect it is noted the important features within the park would be retained and that the building would occupy the area already occupied by buildings, and, or, hard-standing. The proposal would therefore not harm the setting, character and amenity of the Locally Important Historic Park and thus would not be contrary to Policy ENV16 of the Local Plan. 5. Effect on Local Amenity The nearest residential property to the site is Scarthingwell View (The Old Headmaster’s House), to the south west. The occupant of this property has objected on grounds including loss of privacy, overlooking and light pollution as a result of the proposed building being brought closer to his property. The part of the proposed building closest to this neighbour would be single and two-storey with the nearest two storey element being some 23m away from the dweling. In view of these distances and the intervening boundaries, it is not considered that this relationship would significantly detract from the amenity of the occupier of Scarthingwell View. There are no other residential neighbours that may be affected by the proposal. 6. Highway Safety Under Policy T2 development proposals which would result in the creation of a new access or the intensification of use of an existing access should be permitted provided that there would be no detriment to highway safety. The proposal would not result in the creation of a new access and therefore the only consideration is whether the use would, by virtue of intensifying the use of the existing access, be detrimental to highways safety. In this respect the comments made by the objectors are noted. The application information states that the maximum number of staff on duty would increase from 19 to 23 as a result of this proposal. The change from a 50 bed nursing home to a 50 bed care home with 15 close care apartments coupled with this minor increase in the number of staff is not considered to have any material effects on traffic generation and thus highway safety implications. It is understood that there are no fixed visiting times so there is thus unlikely to be any peaks in visitor flows that might impact on the network. The Highway Authority has not raised any objection to the proposal and it is concluded that the proposal would not be detrimental to highway safety and would comply with local plan Policy T2. 7. The Relative Sustainability of the Development The Core Approach of the RSS would see the Principal Towns as the main local focus for new development (Policy YH5). In Selby District, Selby town itself is the sole designated principal town. 373

In terms of location, there is no doubt that the proposed rebuild would be further away from<br />

the listed building when compared to the existing structure. At its nearest points the<br />

nursing home is presently between 11m (single storey) <strong>and</strong> 13m (two storeys) from the<br />

Church. The proposed redevelopment, at its nearest point to the west facing church gable,<br />

would be 22m away. The 35m distance referred to by the applicants is taken from the main<br />

entrance.<br />

It can be agreed that the opportunity for views around the listed church <strong>and</strong> the feeling of<br />

separation between it <strong>and</strong> the proposed development would be an improvement upon the<br />

present situation. However, historically the church was physically linked to the main<br />

Scarthingwell Hall, <strong>and</strong> that outriggers attached to the hall wrapped around the building in<br />

a similar manner to the present nursing home. As such, the proposed open aspect of the<br />

church would not reflect the historic layout <strong>and</strong> grain of the built environment around the<br />

church.<br />

Furthermore the buildings comprising the existing nursing home are rather low. These<br />

would be replaced by building that are considerably higher <strong>and</strong> have an increased scale<br />

<strong>and</strong> mass. This would be exacerbated by the higher ground level of the nursing home site<br />

to the chapel. The overall effect is such that the proposed new building would compete<br />

<strong>with</strong> the listed building <strong>and</strong> in this respect the proposal would detract from the setting of the<br />

listed building.<br />

In addition to the above it is noted that the design of the existing nursing home is ‘modern’<br />

<strong>and</strong> of rather poor quality. Not<strong>with</strong>st<strong>and</strong>ing this there is no presumption that new buildings<br />

should attempt to create a pastiche of the former buildings that they replace or that they<br />

should be traditional appearance per se. Current conservation philosophy recognises that<br />

building design, structure <strong>and</strong> form has changed throughout time <strong>and</strong> expects that new<br />

buildings should be of their time. There is an emphasis on good quality design, including<br />

matter of materials <strong>and</strong> scale.<br />

The proposed nursing home would use artificial stone, by virtue of its scale would compete<br />

<strong>with</strong> listed building <strong>and</strong> is of indifferent appearance.<br />

On balance it is considered that the proposed scheme would have at worse a neutral<br />

effect <strong>and</strong> at best a marginal improvement <strong>and</strong> therefore would preserve the setting of the<br />

listed building. As such the proposal would not be contrary to the guidance contained<br />

<strong>with</strong>in PPG15: Planning <strong>and</strong> the Historic Environment.<br />

4. Effect Upon the Historic Park<br />

The historic park designation is a local designation <strong>and</strong> the effect of proposed<br />

development on a park or its setting is a material consideration. Policy ENV16 would only<br />

allow development if the appearance, setting, character or amenity of the park would not<br />

be harmed.<br />

The review of the Park in 1998 concluded that not enough of the historic layout survived to<br />

merit inclusion in the national list, it was recorded however that the interestingly shaped<br />

pond <strong>and</strong> some of the old trees, for example, form an interesting component of the historic<br />

l<strong>and</strong>scape (English Heritage 1998).<br />

372

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!