Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...
Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ... Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...
the building would be partly built into the hillside. In relation to the potential impact on openness resulting from the alteration of the distribution of mass within the site, Planning Committee considered that this was sufficiently offset by the creation of space between the proposed care home and the dwelling as to have no significant harmful effect on openness. Weight was also given to the fact that the proposed building would not by any higher that the adjacent listed church. As such Planning Committee concluded that the proposal would not be harmful to the openness of the Green Belt. In considering whether the proposal conflicted with the five purposes of including land within the Green Belt, Planning Committee acknowledged that the development would be confined within the boundaries of the existing site. Given that the building occupied only a small part of the application site, and that the application site occupied only a small proportion of the wider historic park it was concluded that the proposal would not result in any significant encroachment into the countryside. Furthermore weight was given to the fact that the proposal would involve the reuse of an existing developed site, in itself being a form of recycling. In addition to the above it was considered that the proposal, by virtue of its size, scale and design, together with the particulars of the development site and its rural setting would not contribute to the sprawl of large built-up areas or result in neighbouring towns from merging into one another. Furthermore it was considered that the proposal would not have a neutral impact on the objective of preserving the setting and special character of historic towns; and assisting in urban regeneration, by the encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land. As such Planning Committee concluded that the proposal would not conflict with the five purposes of including land in Green Belts. Impacts on the Listed Church and Scarthingwell Park In respect of the impact on the listed church, Planning Committee considered that the existing Highfield Nursing Home was of such poor architectural merit that is significantly detracted from the setting of the listed church. The proposed scheme by moving the building further way would increase views of the church. Furthermore the traditional style of the proposed building and use of sympathetic materials also added to the improvement to the setting. Planning Committee noted that although the proposed building was in part three-storeys, the three-storey element was limited and the building stepped down in height as it approached the listed building. In addition the building had been carefully designed to ensure that it was not any taller than the highest point of the church. In conclusion Planning Committee considered that the proposal brought about significant improvements to the setting of the listed building and therefore of the wider Scarthingwell Park. Impacts on European Protected Species In relation to bats Planning Committee noted that the significant improvements to care provision and improvements to the setting of the listed building were sufficient to outweigh the limited harm to bats resulting from the mitigated and compensated scheme. As such in the absence of any satisfactory alternative and that the proposal would maintain the species at a favourable conservation status Planning Committee concluded that the proposal met the requirements of the Habitats Regulations 1994 and PPS9. 360
Sustainability Given that the proposal would be for the replacement of an existing care home and that the site was served by public transport it was considered that the proposal would not conflict with the aims of pursuing sustainable development. Benefits of the Scheme Planning Committee considered that the proposal brought tangible benefits for health and social care provision, by creating a new facility that was fit for purpose and which the new extra care facility would enable care provision to accord with the County Council’s ‘Care for Life’ philosophy. Conclusion Planning Committee concluded that the substantial benefits of the scheme in relation to the improvement of the setting of the listed church and Scarthingwell Park of local historic interest and the improvements of health care to be provided clearly outweighed the harm by reason of inappropriateness, the very limited harm to openness and to be protected species. In respect of other issues, such as drainage and highway safety, it was considered they had no significant weight in the determination of whether very special circumstances existed. As such Planning Committee that although the proposal is a departure to the adopted development plan, other considerations justified approval of the application. 361
- Page 309 and 310: is proportionate, taking into accou
- Page 311 and 312: 311
- Page 313 and 314: Policies YH1, YH2, YH7, YH8, YH9, E
- Page 315 and 316: damage the environment (flora and f
- Page 317 and 318: 3. The principle of a dwelling in t
- Page 319 and 320: new buildings as inappropriate in G
- Page 321 and 322: have detrimental adverse affect on
- Page 323 and 324: 2.15.2 The NPPF paragraph 94 states
- Page 325 and 326: 2.21.2 The proposed developed is th
- Page 327 and 328: access) until splays are provided g
- Page 329 and 330: 329
- Page 331 and 332: Report Reference Number 2012/0479/F
- Page 333 and 334: 1.3.5 An application for conservati
- Page 335 and 336: 8. Nature conservation and protecte
- Page 337 and 338: 2.9.7 NPPF, Paragraph 200, states p
- Page 339 and 340: 2.12.2 The NPPF paragraph 94 states
- Page 341 and 342: the demolition and construction pha
- Page 343 and 344: INFORMATIVE: An explanation of the
- Page 345 and 346: 3.1.2 Human Rights Act 1998 It is c
- Page 347 and 348: Report Reference Number 2012/0443/F
- Page 349 and 350: edrooms in the care home accommodat
- Page 351 and 352: 1.4.8 Yorkshire Wildlife Trust The
- Page 353 and 354: 2.8.3 The Local Planning Authority
- Page 355 and 356: It is therefore concluded that the
- Page 357 and 358: uildings shall be occupied or broug
- Page 359: APPENDIX 1 The Town and Country Pla
- Page 363 and 364: covering being artificial slate. Th
- Page 365 and 366: COUNTY ECOLOGIST It is recommended
- Page 367 and 368: ASSESSMENT The principal issues to
- Page 369 and 370: continually deteriorating building.
- Page 371 and 372: The proposed development would invo
- Page 373 and 374: The Landscape Assessment of the dis
- Page 375 and 376: The submitted bat report states tha
- Page 377 and 378: 377
- Page 379 and 380: 1. Introduction and background 1.1
- Page 381 and 382: Please see note at start of agenda
- Page 383 and 384: policy since the previous approval
- Page 385 and 386: Appendices: None 385
- Page 387 and 388: 387
- Page 389 and 390: 1. Introduction and background 1.1
- Page 391 and 392: • Significant height increase fro
- Page 393 and 394: which will have been judged to be a
- Page 395 and 396: In the interests of visual amenity
the building would be partly built into the hillside. In relation to the potential impact on<br />
openness resulting from the alteration of the distribution of mass <strong>with</strong>in the site, Planning<br />
Committee considered that this was sufficiently offset by the creation of space between the<br />
proposed care home <strong>and</strong> the dwelling as to have no significant harmful effect on<br />
openness. Weight was also given to the fact that the proposed building would not by any<br />
higher that the adjacent listed church.<br />
As such Planning Committee concluded that the proposal would not be harmful to the<br />
openness of the Green Belt.<br />
In considering whether the proposal conflicted <strong>with</strong> the five purposes of including l<strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>with</strong>in the Green Belt, Planning Committee acknowledged that the development would be<br />
confined <strong>with</strong>in the boundaries of the existing site. Given that the building occupied only a<br />
small part of the application site, <strong>and</strong> that the application site occupied only a small<br />
proportion of the wider historic park it was concluded that the proposal would not result in<br />
any significant encroachment into the countryside. Furthermore weight was given to the<br />
fact that the proposal would involve the reuse of an existing developed site, in itself being<br />
a form of recycling.<br />
In addition to the above it was considered that the proposal, by virtue of its size, scale <strong>and</strong><br />
design, together <strong>with</strong> the particulars of the development site <strong>and</strong> its rural setting would not<br />
contribute to the sprawl of large built-up areas or result in neighbouring towns from<br />
merging into one another. Furthermore it was considered that the proposal would not<br />
have a neutral impact on the objective of preserving the setting <strong>and</strong> special character of<br />
historic towns; <strong>and</strong> assisting in urban regeneration, by the encouraging the recycling of<br />
derelict <strong>and</strong> other urban l<strong>and</strong>.<br />
As such Planning Committee concluded that the proposal would not conflict <strong>with</strong> the five<br />
purposes of including l<strong>and</strong> in Green Belts.<br />
Impacts on the Listed Church <strong>and</strong> Scarthingwell Park<br />
In respect of the impact on the listed church, Planning Committee considered that the<br />
existing Highfield Nursing Home was of such poor architectural merit that is significantly<br />
detracted from the setting of the listed church. The proposed scheme by moving the<br />
building further way would increase views of the church. Furthermore the traditional style<br />
of the proposed building <strong>and</strong> use of sympathetic materials also added to the improvement<br />
to the setting. Planning Committee noted that although the proposed building was in part<br />
three-storeys, the three-storey element was limited <strong>and</strong> the building stepped down in<br />
height as it approached the listed building. In addition the building had been carefully<br />
designed to ensure that it was not any taller than the highest point of the church. In<br />
conclusion Planning Committee considered that the proposal brought about significant<br />
improvements to the setting of the listed building <strong>and</strong> therefore of the wider Scarthingwell<br />
Park.<br />
Impacts on European Protected Species<br />
In relation to bats Planning Committee noted that the significant improvements to care<br />
provision <strong>and</strong> improvements to the setting of the listed building were sufficient to outweigh<br />
the limited harm to bats resulting from the mitigated <strong>and</strong> compensated scheme. As such<br />
in the absence of any satisfactory alternative <strong>and</strong> that the proposal would maintain the<br />
species at a favourable conservation status Planning Committee concluded that the<br />
proposal met the requirements of the Habitats Regulations 1994 <strong>and</strong> PPS9.<br />
360