Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ... Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

02.07.2014 Views

the building would be partly built into the hillside. In relation to the potential impact on openness resulting from the alteration of the distribution of mass within the site, Planning Committee considered that this was sufficiently offset by the creation of space between the proposed care home and the dwelling as to have no significant harmful effect on openness. Weight was also given to the fact that the proposed building would not by any higher that the adjacent listed church. As such Planning Committee concluded that the proposal would not be harmful to the openness of the Green Belt. In considering whether the proposal conflicted with the five purposes of including land within the Green Belt, Planning Committee acknowledged that the development would be confined within the boundaries of the existing site. Given that the building occupied only a small part of the application site, and that the application site occupied only a small proportion of the wider historic park it was concluded that the proposal would not result in any significant encroachment into the countryside. Furthermore weight was given to the fact that the proposal would involve the reuse of an existing developed site, in itself being a form of recycling. In addition to the above it was considered that the proposal, by virtue of its size, scale and design, together with the particulars of the development site and its rural setting would not contribute to the sprawl of large built-up areas or result in neighbouring towns from merging into one another. Furthermore it was considered that the proposal would not have a neutral impact on the objective of preserving the setting and special character of historic towns; and assisting in urban regeneration, by the encouraging the recycling of derelict and other urban land. As such Planning Committee concluded that the proposal would not conflict with the five purposes of including land in Green Belts. Impacts on the Listed Church and Scarthingwell Park In respect of the impact on the listed church, Planning Committee considered that the existing Highfield Nursing Home was of such poor architectural merit that is significantly detracted from the setting of the listed church. The proposed scheme by moving the building further way would increase views of the church. Furthermore the traditional style of the proposed building and use of sympathetic materials also added to the improvement to the setting. Planning Committee noted that although the proposed building was in part three-storeys, the three-storey element was limited and the building stepped down in height as it approached the listed building. In addition the building had been carefully designed to ensure that it was not any taller than the highest point of the church. In conclusion Planning Committee considered that the proposal brought about significant improvements to the setting of the listed building and therefore of the wider Scarthingwell Park. Impacts on European Protected Species In relation to bats Planning Committee noted that the significant improvements to care provision and improvements to the setting of the listed building were sufficient to outweigh the limited harm to bats resulting from the mitigated and compensated scheme. As such in the absence of any satisfactory alternative and that the proposal would maintain the species at a favourable conservation status Planning Committee concluded that the proposal met the requirements of the Habitats Regulations 1994 and PPS9. 360

Sustainability Given that the proposal would be for the replacement of an existing care home and that the site was served by public transport it was considered that the proposal would not conflict with the aims of pursuing sustainable development. Benefits of the Scheme Planning Committee considered that the proposal brought tangible benefits for health and social care provision, by creating a new facility that was fit for purpose and which the new extra care facility would enable care provision to accord with the County Council’s ‘Care for Life’ philosophy. Conclusion Planning Committee concluded that the substantial benefits of the scheme in relation to the improvement of the setting of the listed church and Scarthingwell Park of local historic interest and the improvements of health care to be provided clearly outweighed the harm by reason of inappropriateness, the very limited harm to openness and to be protected species. In respect of other issues, such as drainage and highway safety, it was considered they had no significant weight in the determination of whether very special circumstances existed. As such Planning Committee that although the proposal is a departure to the adopted development plan, other considerations justified approval of the application. 361

the building would be partly built into the hillside. In relation to the potential impact on<br />

openness resulting from the alteration of the distribution of mass <strong>with</strong>in the site, Planning<br />

Committee considered that this was sufficiently offset by the creation of space between the<br />

proposed care home <strong>and</strong> the dwelling as to have no significant harmful effect on<br />

openness. Weight was also given to the fact that the proposed building would not by any<br />

higher that the adjacent listed church.<br />

As such Planning Committee concluded that the proposal would not be harmful to the<br />

openness of the Green Belt.<br />

In considering whether the proposal conflicted <strong>with</strong> the five purposes of including l<strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>with</strong>in the Green Belt, Planning Committee acknowledged that the development would be<br />

confined <strong>with</strong>in the boundaries of the existing site. Given that the building occupied only a<br />

small part of the application site, <strong>and</strong> that the application site occupied only a small<br />

proportion of the wider historic park it was concluded that the proposal would not result in<br />

any significant encroachment into the countryside. Furthermore weight was given to the<br />

fact that the proposal would involve the reuse of an existing developed site, in itself being<br />

a form of recycling.<br />

In addition to the above it was considered that the proposal, by virtue of its size, scale <strong>and</strong><br />

design, together <strong>with</strong> the particulars of the development site <strong>and</strong> its rural setting would not<br />

contribute to the sprawl of large built-up areas or result in neighbouring towns from<br />

merging into one another. Furthermore it was considered that the proposal would not<br />

have a neutral impact on the objective of preserving the setting <strong>and</strong> special character of<br />

historic towns; <strong>and</strong> assisting in urban regeneration, by the encouraging the recycling of<br />

derelict <strong>and</strong> other urban l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

As such Planning Committee concluded that the proposal would not conflict <strong>with</strong> the five<br />

purposes of including l<strong>and</strong> in Green Belts.<br />

Impacts on the Listed Church <strong>and</strong> Scarthingwell Park<br />

In respect of the impact on the listed church, Planning Committee considered that the<br />

existing Highfield Nursing Home was of such poor architectural merit that is significantly<br />

detracted from the setting of the listed church. The proposed scheme by moving the<br />

building further way would increase views of the church. Furthermore the traditional style<br />

of the proposed building <strong>and</strong> use of sympathetic materials also added to the improvement<br />

to the setting. Planning Committee noted that although the proposed building was in part<br />

three-storeys, the three-storey element was limited <strong>and</strong> the building stepped down in<br />

height as it approached the listed building. In addition the building had been carefully<br />

designed to ensure that it was not any taller than the highest point of the church. In<br />

conclusion Planning Committee considered that the proposal brought about significant<br />

improvements to the setting of the listed building <strong>and</strong> therefore of the wider Scarthingwell<br />

Park.<br />

Impacts on European Protected Species<br />

In relation to bats Planning Committee noted that the significant improvements to care<br />

provision <strong>and</strong> improvements to the setting of the listed building were sufficient to outweigh<br />

the limited harm to bats resulting from the mitigated <strong>and</strong> compensated scheme. As such<br />

in the absence of any satisfactory alternative <strong>and</strong> that the proposal would maintain the<br />

species at a favourable conservation status Planning Committee concluded that the<br />

proposal met the requirements of the Habitats Regulations 1994 <strong>and</strong> PPS9.<br />

360

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!