Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...
Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ... Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...
346
Report Reference Number 2012/0443/FUL Agenda Item No: 5.12 ___________________________________________________________________ To: Planning Committee Date: 12 September 2012 Author: Louise Milnes (Planning Officer) Lead Officer: Dylan Jones (Business Manager) __________________________________________________________ _______ APPLICATION NUMBER: 8/67/1AB/PA PARISH: Saxton Cum Scarthingwell 2012/0443/FUL Parish APPLICANT: Barchester Healthcare VALID DATE: 1 May 2012 EXPIRY DATE: 31 July 2012 PROPOSAL: LOCATION: Extension of time application to approval 2007/1199/PA (8/67/1AA/PA) for the erection of a 50 bed care home with additional 15 close care apartments following demolition of the existing care home (in accordance with amended information received by the local planning authority on 1 August 2008) Highfield Nursing Home Scarthingwell Park Barkston Ash Tadcaster LS24 9PG This application has been brought before Planning Committee as it is a Departure from the Development Plan. Summary: The development proposed is an application for extension of time for the erection of a care home and 15 close care apartments, which was judged to be acceptable at an earlier date. The main issue is therefore whether there are any significant changes in the development plan or other relevant material considerations since the permission was granted, which would lead to a significantly different decision on the application. Having taken into account the changes to the site and its surroundings, planning applications on or around the site and changes in policy since the previous approval it is not considered that there are other material considerations that would lead to a significantly different decision and as such the application should be approved in accordance with the conditions set out on the original consent. 347
- Page 295 and 296: 3.1.2 Human Rights Act 1998 It is c
- Page 297 and 298: 297
- Page 299 and 300: This planning application is recomm
- Page 301 and 302: • The proposal places a property
- Page 303 and 304: 2.6.1 Policies YH1 and H1 of the Re
- Page 305 and 306: therefore considered that in respec
- Page 307 and 308: 2.11.3 The application site is loca
- Page 309 and 310: is proportionate, taking into accou
- Page 311 and 312: 311
- Page 313 and 314: Policies YH1, YH2, YH7, YH8, YH9, E
- Page 315 and 316: damage the environment (flora and f
- Page 317 and 318: 3. The principle of a dwelling in t
- Page 319 and 320: new buildings as inappropriate in G
- Page 321 and 322: have detrimental adverse affect on
- Page 323 and 324: 2.15.2 The NPPF paragraph 94 states
- Page 325 and 326: 2.21.2 The proposed developed is th
- Page 327 and 328: access) until splays are provided g
- Page 329 and 330: 329
- Page 331 and 332: Report Reference Number 2012/0479/F
- Page 333 and 334: 1.3.5 An application for conservati
- Page 335 and 336: 8. Nature conservation and protecte
- Page 337 and 338: 2.9.7 NPPF, Paragraph 200, states p
- Page 339 and 340: 2.12.2 The NPPF paragraph 94 states
- Page 341 and 342: the demolition and construction pha
- Page 343 and 344: INFORMATIVE: An explanation of the
- Page 345: 3.1.2 Human Rights Act 1998 It is c
- Page 349 and 350: edrooms in the care home accommodat
- Page 351 and 352: 1.4.8 Yorkshire Wildlife Trust The
- Page 353 and 354: 2.8.3 The Local Planning Authority
- Page 355 and 356: It is therefore concluded that the
- Page 357 and 358: uildings shall be occupied or broug
- Page 359 and 360: APPENDIX 1 The Town and Country Pla
- Page 361 and 362: Sustainability Given that the propo
- Page 363 and 364: covering being artificial slate. Th
- Page 365 and 366: COUNTY ECOLOGIST It is recommended
- Page 367 and 368: ASSESSMENT The principal issues to
- Page 369 and 370: continually deteriorating building.
- Page 371 and 372: The proposed development would invo
- Page 373 and 374: The Landscape Assessment of the dis
- Page 375 and 376: The submitted bat report states tha
- Page 377 and 378: 377
- Page 379 and 380: 1. Introduction and background 1.1
- Page 381 and 382: Please see note at start of agenda
- Page 383 and 384: policy since the previous approval
- Page 385 and 386: Appendices: None 385
- Page 387 and 388: 387
- Page 389 and 390: 1. Introduction and background 1.1
- Page 391 and 392: • Significant height increase fro
- Page 393 and 394: which will have been judged to be a
- Page 395 and 396: In the interests of visual amenity
Report Reference Number 2012/0443/FUL <strong>Agenda</strong> Item No: 5.12<br />
___________________________________________________________________<br />
To:<br />
Planning Committee<br />
Date: 12 September 2012<br />
Author:<br />
Louise Milnes (Planning Officer)<br />
Lead Officer:<br />
Dylan Jones (Business Manager)<br />
__________________________________________________________ _______<br />
APPLICATION<br />
NUMBER:<br />
8/67/1AB/PA PARISH: Saxton Cum Scarthingwell<br />
2012/0443/FUL<br />
Parish<br />
APPLICANT:<br />
Barchester<br />
Healthcare<br />
VALID DATE: 1 May 2012<br />
EXPIRY DATE: 31 July 2012<br />
PROPOSAL:<br />
LOCATION:<br />
Extension of time application to approval 2007/1199/PA<br />
(8/67/1AA/PA) for the erection of a 50 bed care home <strong>with</strong><br />
additional 15 close care apartments following demolition of the<br />
existing care home (in accordance <strong>with</strong> amended information<br />
received by the local planning authority on 1 August 2008)<br />
Highfield Nursing Home<br />
Scarthingwell Park<br />
Barkston Ash<br />
Tadcaster<br />
LS24 9PG<br />
This application has been brought before Planning Committee as it is a Departure from the<br />
Development Plan.<br />
Summary:<br />
The development proposed is an application for extension of time for the erection of a care<br />
home <strong>and</strong> 15 close care apartments, which was judged to be acceptable at an earlier date.<br />
The main issue is therefore whether there are any significant changes in the development<br />
plan or other relevant material considerations since the permission was granted, which<br />
would lead to a significantly different decision on the application. Having taken into<br />
account the changes to the site <strong>and</strong> its surroundings, planning applications on or around<br />
the site <strong>and</strong> changes in policy since the previous approval it is not considered that there<br />
are other material considerations that would lead to a significantly different decision <strong>and</strong> as<br />
such the application should be approved in accordance <strong>with</strong> the conditions set out on the<br />
original consent.<br />
347