Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...
Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ... Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...
from the existing building in the area. The proposal would not be visually harmful the Green Belt and is considered not to cause a significant adverse affect the openness of the Green Belt and therefore accords with policy GB4 and the advise contained within the NPPF. 2.12 Design and effect upon the character of the area 2.12.1 Selby District Local Plan Policy ENV1 (1) requires development to take account of the effect upon the character of the area, with ENV1 (4) requiring the standard of layout, design and materials to respect the site and its surroundings. Policy H6(1) also requires development to ensure it is of a scale and design appropriate to the form and character of the settlement and immediate locality. Significant weight should be attached to these policies as they are broadly consistent with the aims of the NPPF. 2.12.2 The NPPF paragraph 56 states the Government attaches great importance to the design of the built environment. Good design is a key aspect of sustainable development, is indivisible from good planning, and should contribute positively to making places better for people. 2.12.3 Paragraphs 60, 61 and 65 of the NPPF make it clear that decisions should not attempt to impose architectural styles or particular tastes and should not stifle innovation, originality or initiative through unsubstantiated requirements to conform to certain development forms or styles, should address the connections between people and places and the integration of new development into the natural, built and historic environment and proposals should not be refused for buildings which promote high levels of sustainability because of concerns about incompatibility with an existing townscape, if those concerns have been mitigated by good design. 2.12.4 NPPF, Paragraph 200, states planning conditions should not be used to restrict permitted development rights unless there is clear justification to do so 2.12.5 The surrounding area within Back Lane consists of a mixture of house types and houses of differing ages. There are a mixture of bungalows and two storey detached dwellings on Back Lane. The layout and spacing between the side elevations of the dwellings on Garnet Lane have no distinctive uniform character. The layout and positioning of the dwellings to the front elevation have a distinct uniform character as the front elevations are predominately in line with each other. 2.12.6 The proposed scheme is for a two storey detached dwelling, which has a height of 5.4 metres to eaves, and 8.4metres to it ridge. The proposed scheme retains existing character and form of the area driveways to the front and garden space. The proposed layout as sufficient space in relation to neighbouring boundaries and has good relationship to the character and form of the area. The proposal is of a simple symmetrical fenestration detail which is sympathetic to the character and form of the surrounding area. The proposed scheme involves an access to the front which has an area of block paved drive to the north-east part of the site and the rest of the front garden is to be grassed. All of the rear amenity space is to be grassed garden. To the north and north-east boundary the 2metre high hedge is to be replanted. On the east elevation behind the front wall of the proposed dwelling the boundary treatment is to be a 1.8metre high boundary wall. To the west elevation it is to be 1.8metre high boundary fence. The proposed scheme is considered not 320
have detrimental adverse affect on the character and form of the area by virtue of the scheme’s design, layout, scale, external appearance and landscaping. The proposed scheme therefore complies with Policies ENV21, H7 (1) and ENV1 (1) and (4) of the Selby District Plan. 2.12.7 The applicant has submitted a Heritage Statement which recognises the important characteristics of the conservation area and takes account of the impact of the proposals on the conservation area as a heritage asset in line with NPPF guidance. 2.12.8 Having taken the above into account it is considered that the proposed dwelling would be of an appropriate design and appearance which would enhance the character and appearance of the conservation area in accordance with policies ENV1, ENV21, ENV25 and H7 of the Selby District Local Plan and the NPPF. 2.13 Impact on Heritage Assets 2.13.1 The application site is located with Bilbrough Conservation Area. Whilst in considering proposal which affect conservation areas regard is to be made to S72 (1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas Act) 1990 states that with respect to any buildings or other land in a conservation area, of any powers under any of the provisions mentioned in subsection (2), special attention shall be paid to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of the conservation area. 2.13.2 Policy ENV25 of the Selby District Local Plan is also relevant and states that development within a conservation area will be permitted provided the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the conservation area. Policy ENV25 states that development within or affecting a conservation area will be permitted provided the proposal would preserve or enhance character and appearance of the conservation area and in particular the scale, form, position, design and materials of new buildings to be appropriate to the historic context, features of townscape importance are retained, the proposal would not adversely affecting the setting or significant views into or out of the area and the external site works and boundary treatments are compatible with the character and appearance of the area. 2.13.3 The NPPF paragraphs 126 to 141 supports the conservation and enhancement of the historic environment and in particular the desirability of new development making a positive contribution to the local character and distinctiveness and requires applicants to describe the significance of heritage assets affected including any contribution to their setting. 2.13.4 It is considered that policies ENV25 of the Selby District Local Plan should be give significant weight as they are broadly in accordance with the emphasis with the NPPF which considers conserving and enhancing the historic environment in particular paragraphs128 and132 of NPPF. 2.13.5 NPPF paragraph 128 states “In determining applications, local planning authorities should require an applicant to describe the significance of any heritage assets affected, including any contribution made by their setting. The level of detail should be proportionate to the assets’ importance and no more than is sufficient to understand the potential impact of the proposal on their significance. As a minimum 321
- Page 269 and 270: 269
- Page 271 and 272: This planning application is recomm
- Page 273 and 274: • Policy YH1: Overall approach an
- Page 275 and 276: 2.7.1 Selby District Local Plan Pol
- Page 277 and 278: 2.8.6 The rear elevation of the dwe
- Page 279 and 280: 1. The development for which permis
- Page 281 and 282: 4 Conclusion As stated in the main
- Page 283 and 284: 283
- Page 285 and 286: This planning application is recomm
- Page 287 and 288: Please see note at start of agenda
- Page 289 and 290: 2.6.3 Local Plan policy H6 identifi
- Page 291 and 292: should be attached to these policie
- Page 293 and 294: 2.12.2 Having assessed the proposal
- Page 295 and 296: 3.1.2 Human Rights Act 1998 It is c
- Page 297 and 298: 297
- Page 299 and 300: This planning application is recomm
- Page 301 and 302: • The proposal places a property
- Page 303 and 304: 2.6.1 Policies YH1 and H1 of the Re
- Page 305 and 306: therefore considered that in respec
- Page 307 and 308: 2.11.3 The application site is loca
- Page 309 and 310: is proportionate, taking into accou
- Page 311 and 312: 311
- Page 313 and 314: Policies YH1, YH2, YH7, YH8, YH9, E
- Page 315 and 316: damage the environment (flora and f
- Page 317 and 318: 3. The principle of a dwelling in t
- Page 319: new buildings as inappropriate in G
- Page 323 and 324: 2.15.2 The NPPF paragraph 94 states
- Page 325 and 326: 2.21.2 The proposed developed is th
- Page 327 and 328: access) until splays are provided g
- Page 329 and 330: 329
- Page 331 and 332: Report Reference Number 2012/0479/F
- Page 333 and 334: 1.3.5 An application for conservati
- Page 335 and 336: 8. Nature conservation and protecte
- Page 337 and 338: 2.9.7 NPPF, Paragraph 200, states p
- Page 339 and 340: 2.12.2 The NPPF paragraph 94 states
- Page 341 and 342: the demolition and construction pha
- Page 343 and 344: INFORMATIVE: An explanation of the
- Page 345 and 346: 3.1.2 Human Rights Act 1998 It is c
- Page 347 and 348: Report Reference Number 2012/0443/F
- Page 349 and 350: edrooms in the care home accommodat
- Page 351 and 352: 1.4.8 Yorkshire Wildlife Trust The
- Page 353 and 354: 2.8.3 The Local Planning Authority
- Page 355 and 356: It is therefore concluded that the
- Page 357 and 358: uildings shall be occupied or broug
- Page 359 and 360: APPENDIX 1 The Town and Country Pla
- Page 361 and 362: Sustainability Given that the propo
- Page 363 and 364: covering being artificial slate. Th
- Page 365 and 366: COUNTY ECOLOGIST It is recommended
- Page 367 and 368: ASSESSMENT The principal issues to
- Page 369 and 370: continually deteriorating building.
have detrimental adverse affect on the character <strong>and</strong> form of the area by virtue of<br />
the scheme’s design, layout, scale, external appearance <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>scaping. The<br />
proposed scheme therefore complies <strong>with</strong> Policies ENV21, H7 (1) <strong>and</strong> ENV1 (1)<br />
<strong>and</strong> (4) of the <strong>Selby</strong> <strong>District</strong> Plan.<br />
2.12.7 The applicant has submitted a Heritage Statement which recognises the important<br />
characteristics of the conservation area <strong>and</strong> takes account of the impact of the<br />
proposals on the conservation area as a heritage asset in line <strong>with</strong> NPPF guidance.<br />
2.12.8 Having taken the above into account it is considered that the proposed dwelling<br />
would be of an appropriate design <strong>and</strong> appearance which would enhance the<br />
character <strong>and</strong> appearance of the conservation area in accordance <strong>with</strong> policies<br />
ENV1, ENV21, ENV25 <strong>and</strong> H7 of the <strong>Selby</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan <strong>and</strong> the NPPF.<br />
2.13 Impact on Heritage Assets<br />
2.13.1 The application site is located <strong>with</strong> Bilbrough Conservation Area. Whilst in<br />
considering proposal which affect conservation areas regard is to be made to S72<br />
(1) of the Planning (Listed Buildings <strong>and</strong> Conservation Areas Act) 1990 states that<br />
<strong>with</strong> respect to any buildings or other l<strong>and</strong> in a conservation area, of any powers<br />
under any of the provisions mentioned in subsection (2), special attention shall be<br />
paid to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of<br />
the conservation area.<br />
2.13.2 Policy ENV25 of the <strong>Selby</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan is also relevant <strong>and</strong> states that<br />
development <strong>with</strong>in a conservation area will be permitted provided the proposal<br />
would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the conservation area.<br />
Policy ENV25 states that development <strong>with</strong>in or affecting a conservation area will<br />
be permitted provided the proposal would preserve or enhance character <strong>and</strong><br />
appearance of the conservation area <strong>and</strong> in particular the scale, form, position,<br />
design <strong>and</strong> materials of new buildings to be appropriate to the historic context,<br />
features of townscape importance are retained, the proposal would not adversely<br />
affecting the setting or significant views into or out of the area <strong>and</strong> the external site<br />
works <strong>and</strong> boundary treatments are compatible <strong>with</strong> the character <strong>and</strong> appearance<br />
of the area.<br />
2.13.3 The NPPF paragraphs 126 to 141 supports the conservation <strong>and</strong> enhancement of<br />
the historic environment <strong>and</strong> in particular the desirability of new development<br />
making a positive contribution to the local character <strong>and</strong> distinctiveness <strong>and</strong><br />
requires applicants to describe the significance of heritage assets affected including<br />
any contribution to their setting.<br />
2.13.4 It is considered that policies ENV25 of the <strong>Selby</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan should be give<br />
significant weight as they are broadly in accordance <strong>with</strong> the emphasis <strong>with</strong> the<br />
NPPF which considers conserving <strong>and</strong> enhancing the historic environment in<br />
particular paragraphs128 <strong>and</strong>132 of NPPF.<br />
2.13.5 NPPF paragraph 128 states “In determining applications, local planning authorities<br />
should require an applicant to describe the significance of any heritage assets<br />
affected, including any contribution made by their setting. The level of detail should<br />
be proportionate to the assets’ importance <strong>and</strong> no more than is sufficient to<br />
underst<strong>and</strong> the potential impact of the proposal on their significance. As a minimum<br />
321