Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...
Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ... Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...
2.9 Impact on Residential Amenity 2.9.1 Policy ENV1 (1) of the Local Plan requires development to take account of the effect upon the amenity of adjoining occupiers. Significant weight can be attached to this policy as it is broadly consistent with the aims of the NPPF which also seeks to protect residential amenity. 2.9.2 The application site is located on a small established industrial estate. There are no residential dwellings within the immediate vicinity of the application site. 2.9.3 The proposed development would not significantly increase the intensity of the industrial estate, nor would it compromise the operating conditions of other units on the site. The maintenance building would serve the existing estate and would facilitate the management and ongoing maintenance of the overall site. 2.9.4 The proposed development is therefore considered not to cause significant detrimental impact on the occupiers and users of other surrounding properties in accordance with policies ENV1 (1) of the Local Plan and the NPPF. 2.10 Impact on Highway Network 2.10.1 Policies ENV1 (2), T1 and T2 of the Local Plan require development to ensure that there is no detrimental impact on the existing highway network or parking arrangements. Policy EMP9 (1) of the local plan states proposals for the expansion and/or redevelopment of existing industrial and business uses outside development limits and established employment areas, as defined on the proposals map, will be permitted provided the proposal would not create conditions prejudicial to highway safety or which would have a significant adverse effect on local amenity. These Local Plan policies should be afforded significant weight as they are broadly consistent with the aims of the NPPF. 2.10.2 The existing access road would not be altered as part of the proposed development. The site and surrounding sites are currently accessed off the A162 and this would remain unchanged. The development would occupy an existing hard standing area within the site which is currently bounded by palisade fencing and used for external storage. The proposed new building would not result in the loss of any existing parking spaces at the site and would provide an additional three parking spaces which would serve the building. 2.10.3 The proposed building would serve the industrial estate on which it would be sited. It is not considered that the development would result in a significant increase in the number of vehicles coming and going to and from the site nor would it result in a significant increase in the demand for parking. 2.10.4 No objections have been raised on highways grounds. The proposals are therefore considered acceptable and are in accordance with Policies ENV1(2), T1 and T2 of the Selby District Local Plan. 2.11 Flood Risk and Drainage 2.11.1 Policy ENV2(A) of the local plan states proposals for development which would give rise to, or would be affected by, unacceptable levels of noise, nuisance, 234
contamination or other environmental pollution including groundwater pollution will not be permitted unless satisfactory remedial or preventative measures are incorporated as an integral element in the scheme. Such measures should be carried out before the use of the site commences. 2.11.2 The application site is located within Flood Zone 1 and is therefore deemed to be ‘appropriate development’ by the National Planning Policy Framework. 2.11.3 Comments received from the Selby Area Internal Drainage Board advise that the nearby watercourses are not maintained by them and that the discharge from the mains is via a pumped system into Mill Dyke which is the main river and the responsibility of the Environment Agency. The Environment Agency has been consulted and has raised no objections. 2.11.4 The Selby Area Internal Drainage Board also advise that the Council will need to be satisfied that the existing main has sufficient capacity to accommodate all additional flows on completion of the development and that all systems downstream from the main river have sufficient capacity. 2.11.5 The location of the proposed development is currently hard standing. The proposed development would not occupy a larger footprint, nor would it increase the amount of hard standing at the site and would therefore not increase the amount of surface run off from the site. 2.11.6 A condition has been recommended requiring a scheme for the disposal of foul and surface waters within the site to be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority prior to the commencement of the development in order to prevent groundwater pollution and to reduce the risk of flooding from overland flows in accordance with policy ENV2 (A) of the Selby District Local Plan. 2.12 Conclusion 2.12.1 The proposal is considered to be acceptable in principle and would accord with the requirements of the NPPF in relation to limited developments/infill buildings in the Green Belt. The proposal represents the provision of a relatively small scale development which would support the existing Bypass Park Estate. It is considered that the proposed development would not have an unacceptable detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the area, nor would it unacceptably impact on the openness of the Green Belt. The proposal would not adversely affect highway safety and would not compromise the operating conditions of other surrounding properties. The proposals would not compromise the aims and objectives of all relevant national policies and local policies, and there are no material planning considerations that would justify a refusal of permission. 2.13 Recommendation This application is recommended to be APPROVED subject to the following conditions: 01. The development for which permission is hereby granted shall be begun within a period of three years from the date of this permission. 235
- Page 183 and 184: The proposed development will only
- Page 185 and 186: countryside. The authority will nee
- Page 187 and 188: 1.4.20 Ramblers' Association No res
- Page 189 and 190: - Carousel Walk being opened up int
- Page 191 and 192: - Time frame for development up to
- Page 193 and 194: 2.7 Key Issues • Village Design S
- Page 195 and 196: 2.8.10 Policy H2A was clear that th
- Page 197 and 198: Elmet as being one of the most sust
- Page 199 and 200: an assessment of the cumulative imp
- Page 201 and 202: • Adequate facilities are provide
- Page 203 and 204: 2.9.31 As such the scheme is consid
- Page 205 and 206: • A linear belt of green space re
- Page 207 and 208: The proposals are therefore conside
- Page 209 and 210: watercourses. Furthermore flow atte
- Page 211 and 212: granted subject to conditions to pr
- Page 213 and 214: is in “outline” form details of
- Page 215 and 216: protected during the construction s
- Page 217 and 218: In light of the above, Officers wou
- Page 219 and 220: 2.22.13 The scheme does not include
- Page 221 and 222: Objectors have raised concerns rela
- Page 223 and 224: would provide financial contributio
- Page 225 and 226: 225
- Page 227 and 228: Report Reference Number: 2012/0401/
- Page 229 and 230: land adjacent to units 11-14 on the
- Page 231 and 232: 2.5.1 Please see note at start of a
- Page 233: 2.8.2 Policy EMP9 of the local plan
- Page 237 and 238: 5.1 Planning Application file refer
- Page 239 and 240: 239
- Page 241 and 242: Having reviewed the revised scheme
- Page 243 and 244: 1.4 Consultations 1.4.1 Yorkshire W
- Page 245 and 246: Policy H6: Policy ENV1: Policy ENV2
- Page 247 and 248: ungalow to the south. To the east o
- Page 249 and 250: that shall first be submitted to an
- Page 251 and 252: 251
- Page 253 and 254: Report Reference Number: 2011/1049/
- Page 255 and 256: 1.4.6 Yorkshire Wildlife Trust - No
- Page 257 and 258: 2.6.1 Policies Y1, YH5, H1, H2 and
- Page 259 and 260: 2.7.9 Consequently, subject to the
- Page 261 and 262: acceptable in highway safety terms
- Page 263 and 264: uilding 4 or more units being requi
- Page 265 and 266: The part of the access extending 6
- Page 267 and 268: 4. Conclusion 4.1 As stated in the
- Page 269 and 270: 269
- Page 271 and 272: This planning application is recomm
- Page 273 and 274: • Policy YH1: Overall approach an
- Page 275 and 276: 2.7.1 Selby District Local Plan Pol
- Page 277 and 278: 2.8.6 The rear elevation of the dwe
- Page 279 and 280: 1. The development for which permis
- Page 281 and 282: 4 Conclusion As stated in the main
- Page 283 and 284: 283
contamination or other environmental pollution including groundwater pollution will<br />
not be permitted unless satisfactory remedial or preventative measures are<br />
incorporated as an integral element in the scheme. Such measures should be<br />
carried out before the use of the site commences.<br />
2.11.2 The application site is located <strong>with</strong>in Flood Zone 1 <strong>and</strong> is therefore deemed to be<br />
‘appropriate development’ by the National Planning Policy Framework.<br />
2.11.3 Comments received from the <strong>Selby</strong> Area Internal Drainage Board advise that the<br />
nearby watercourses are not maintained by them <strong>and</strong> that the discharge from the<br />
mains is via a pumped system into Mill Dyke which is the main river <strong>and</strong> the<br />
responsibility of the Environment Agency. The Environment Agency has been<br />
consulted <strong>and</strong> has raised no objections.<br />
2.11.4 The <strong>Selby</strong> Area Internal Drainage Board also advise that the Council will need to be<br />
satisfied that the existing main has sufficient capacity to accommodate all additional<br />
flows on completion of the development <strong>and</strong> that all systems downstream from the<br />
main river have sufficient capacity.<br />
2.11.5 The location of the proposed development is currently hard st<strong>and</strong>ing. The proposed<br />
development would not occupy a larger footprint, nor would it increase the amount<br />
of hard st<strong>and</strong>ing at the site <strong>and</strong> would therefore not increase the amount of surface<br />
run off from the site.<br />
2.11.6 A condition has been recommended requiring a scheme for the disposal of foul <strong>and</strong><br />
surface waters <strong>with</strong>in the site to be submitted to <strong>and</strong> approved in writing by the<br />
Local Planning Authority prior to the commencement of the development in order to<br />
prevent groundwater pollution <strong>and</strong> to reduce the risk of flooding from overl<strong>and</strong> flows<br />
in accordance <strong>with</strong> policy ENV2 (A) of the <strong>Selby</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan.<br />
2.12 Conclusion<br />
2.12.1 The proposal is considered to be acceptable in principle <strong>and</strong> would accord <strong>with</strong> the<br />
requirements of the NPPF in relation to limited developments/infill buildings in the<br />
Green Belt. The proposal represents the provision of a relatively small scale<br />
development which would support the existing Bypass Park Estate. It is considered<br />
that the proposed development would not have an unacceptable detrimental impact<br />
on the character <strong>and</strong> appearance of the area, nor would it unacceptably impact on<br />
the openness of the Green Belt. The proposal would not adversely affect highway<br />
safety <strong>and</strong> would not compromise the operating conditions of other surrounding<br />
properties. The proposals would not compromise the aims <strong>and</strong> objectives of all<br />
relevant national policies <strong>and</strong> local policies, <strong>and</strong> there are no material planning<br />
considerations that would justify a refusal of permission.<br />
2.13 Recommendation<br />
This application is recommended to be APPROVED subject to the following<br />
conditions:<br />
01. The development for which permission is hereby granted shall be begun<br />
<strong>with</strong>in a period of three years from the date of this permission.<br />
235