Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...
Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ... Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...
c If the development is appropriate, the application should be determined on its own merits. If the development is inappropriate, the presumption against inappropriate development in the Green Belt applies and the development should not be permitted unless there are very special circumstances which outweigh the presumption against it. 2.7.7 Paragraph 87 states that “as with previous Green Belt policy, inappropriate development is, by definition, harmful to the Green Belt and should not be approved except in very special circumstances”. Paragraph 88 states that “When considering any planning application, local planning authorities should ensure that substantial weight is given to any harm to the Green Belt. ‘Very special circumstances’ will not exist unless the potential harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations”. 2.7.8 Policy GB2 of the Local plan states that development within the Green Belt will not be permitted except for the purposes listed in the policy, which includes the limited redevelopment, alteration and small scale extension of existing commercial premises which do not have a materially greater impact than the present use on the openness of the Green Belt. This approach conflicts with the contents of the NPPF and the NPPF should therefore be given greater weight. 2.7.9 The NPPF states the following as an exception to the usual rule that new buildings in the Green Belt are inappropriate: ‘limited infilling or the partial or complete redevelopment of previously development sites (brownfield land), whether redundant or in continuing use (excluding temporary buildings), which would not have a greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt and the purpose of including land within it than the existing development. 2.7.10 The application site is located within the wider Bypass Park Estate. It is previously developed land and is currently in use for external storage and accommodates a number of structures. 2.7.11 Given its location within the wider industrial estate and that the development would improve the employment area by replacing temporary buildings with a more permanent structure and it would not have a greater impact upon the openness of the greenbelt over and above that of the existing industrial estate, it is considered that the development constitutes appropriate development within the greenbelt. 2.7.12 It is considered, therefore that the principle of the development is acceptable subject to compliance with all other relevant planning policies. 2.8 Design, Layout and Scale 2.8.1 Policy GB4 of the local plan states that proposals for development in the Green Belt will only be permitted where the scale, location, materials and design of any buildings or structure, or the laying out and use of land would not detract from the open character and visual amenity of the green belt or the form and character of any settlement within it. 232
2.8.2 Policy EMP9 of the local plan states proposals for the expansion and/or redevelopment of existing industrial and business uses outside development limits and established employment areas, as defined on the proposals map, will be permitted provided: 1) The proposal would not create conditions prejudicial to highway safety or which would have a significant adverse effect on local amenity; 2) The nature and scale of the proposal would not have a significant adverse effect on the character and appearance of the area, or harm acknowledged nature conservation interests; 3) The proposal would achieve a high standard of design, materials and landscaping which complements existing buildings; and 4) Proposals involving expansion onto adjoining land would not result in the loss of best and most versatile agricultural land and the site would be well related to existing development and well screened and/or landscaped. 2.8.3 Policy ENV1 (1) requires development to take account of the effect upon the character of the area, with ENV1 (4) requiring the standard of layout, design and materials to respect the site and its surroundings. These policies are broadly in accordance with the aims of the NPPF and as such can be afforded significant weight in the consideration of this application. 2.8.4 The site is currently used for external storage and is bounded by palisade fencing. The proposed building would not occupy any larger footprint than the existing storage area and would act as a maintenance and storage building in connection with the established commercial uses on the site. The site forms part of the industrial estate and is bounded to both sides by existing employment uses. 2.8.5 The proposed building is of good design and would respect the character and appearance of others buildings on the estate. Its appearance is typical of other commercial developments which are common place on industrial estates. It is considered that the scale of the development is acceptable as is the design and appearance of the proposed building. 2.8.6 The proposed development would replace a number of smaller buildings including a number of storage containers and a modular building. It is considered that the replacement of these structures with one larger building would improve the visual amenity of the site, and given the location of the site within the wider estate, would not impact significantly on the open character and visual amenity of the green belt over and above that of the existing buildings on the application site and the remainder of the estate. 2.8.7 The building would be finished with brickwork and cladding to the elevations and the roof would be constructed of insulated profiled metal sheeting. A condition is recommended requiring full details and samples of the proposed materials to be submitted and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority prior to the commencement of the development. 2.8.8 It is considered, therefore, that the proposed development would not appear as a prominent feature and would not have an unacceptable impact on the character and appearance of the area or on the openness of the Green Belt in accordance with the NPPF and policies ENV 1, GB4 and EMP9 of the local plan. 233
- Page 181 and 182: The Council has no evidence of any
- Page 183 and 184: The proposed development will only
- Page 185 and 186: countryside. The authority will nee
- Page 187 and 188: 1.4.20 Ramblers' Association No res
- Page 189 and 190: - Carousel Walk being opened up int
- Page 191 and 192: - Time frame for development up to
- Page 193 and 194: 2.7 Key Issues • Village Design S
- Page 195 and 196: 2.8.10 Policy H2A was clear that th
- Page 197 and 198: Elmet as being one of the most sust
- Page 199 and 200: an assessment of the cumulative imp
- Page 201 and 202: • Adequate facilities are provide
- Page 203 and 204: 2.9.31 As such the scheme is consid
- Page 205 and 206: • A linear belt of green space re
- Page 207 and 208: The proposals are therefore conside
- Page 209 and 210: watercourses. Furthermore flow atte
- Page 211 and 212: granted subject to conditions to pr
- Page 213 and 214: is in “outline” form details of
- Page 215 and 216: protected during the construction s
- Page 217 and 218: In light of the above, Officers wou
- Page 219 and 220: 2.22.13 The scheme does not include
- Page 221 and 222: Objectors have raised concerns rela
- Page 223 and 224: would provide financial contributio
- Page 225 and 226: 225
- Page 227 and 228: Report Reference Number: 2012/0401/
- Page 229 and 230: land adjacent to units 11-14 on the
- Page 231: 2.5.1 Please see note at start of a
- Page 235 and 236: contamination or other environmenta
- Page 237 and 238: 5.1 Planning Application file refer
- Page 239 and 240: 239
- Page 241 and 242: Having reviewed the revised scheme
- Page 243 and 244: 1.4 Consultations 1.4.1 Yorkshire W
- Page 245 and 246: Policy H6: Policy ENV1: Policy ENV2
- Page 247 and 248: ungalow to the south. To the east o
- Page 249 and 250: that shall first be submitted to an
- Page 251 and 252: 251
- Page 253 and 254: Report Reference Number: 2011/1049/
- Page 255 and 256: 1.4.6 Yorkshire Wildlife Trust - No
- Page 257 and 258: 2.6.1 Policies Y1, YH5, H1, H2 and
- Page 259 and 260: 2.7.9 Consequently, subject to the
- Page 261 and 262: acceptable in highway safety terms
- Page 263 and 264: uilding 4 or more units being requi
- Page 265 and 266: The part of the access extending 6
- Page 267 and 268: 4. Conclusion 4.1 As stated in the
- Page 269 and 270: 269
- Page 271 and 272: This planning application is recomm
- Page 273 and 274: • Policy YH1: Overall approach an
- Page 275 and 276: 2.7.1 Selby District Local Plan Pol
- Page 277 and 278: 2.8.6 The rear elevation of the dwe
- Page 279 and 280: 1. The development for which permis
- Page 281 and 282: 4 Conclusion As stated in the main
2.8.2 Policy EMP9 of the local plan states proposals for the expansion <strong>and</strong>/or<br />
redevelopment of existing industrial <strong>and</strong> business uses outside development limits<br />
<strong>and</strong> established employment areas, as defined on the proposals map, will be<br />
permitted provided:<br />
1) The proposal would not create conditions prejudicial to highway safety or which<br />
would have a significant adverse effect on local amenity;<br />
2) The nature <strong>and</strong> scale of the proposal would not have a significant adverse effect<br />
on the character <strong>and</strong> appearance of the area, or harm acknowledged nature<br />
conservation interests;<br />
3) The proposal would achieve a high st<strong>and</strong>ard of design, materials <strong>and</strong><br />
l<strong>and</strong>scaping which complements existing buildings; <strong>and</strong><br />
4) Proposals involving expansion onto adjoining l<strong>and</strong> would not result in the loss of<br />
best <strong>and</strong> most versatile agricultural l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> the site would be well related to<br />
existing development <strong>and</strong> well screened <strong>and</strong>/or l<strong>and</strong>scaped.<br />
2.8.3 Policy ENV1 (1) requires development to take account of the effect upon the<br />
character of the area, <strong>with</strong> ENV1 (4) requiring the st<strong>and</strong>ard of layout, design <strong>and</strong><br />
materials to respect the site <strong>and</strong> its surroundings. These policies are broadly in<br />
accordance <strong>with</strong> the aims of the NPPF <strong>and</strong> as such can be afforded significant<br />
weight in the consideration of this application.<br />
2.8.4 The site is currently used for external storage <strong>and</strong> is bounded by palisade fencing.<br />
The proposed building would not occupy any larger footprint than the existing<br />
storage area <strong>and</strong> would act as a maintenance <strong>and</strong> storage building in connection<br />
<strong>with</strong> the established commercial uses on the site. The site forms part of the<br />
industrial estate <strong>and</strong> is bounded to both sides by existing employment uses.<br />
2.8.5 The proposed building is of good design <strong>and</strong> would respect the character <strong>and</strong><br />
appearance of others buildings on the estate. Its appearance is typical of other<br />
commercial developments which are common place on industrial estates. It is<br />
considered that the scale of the development is acceptable as is the design <strong>and</strong><br />
appearance of the proposed building.<br />
2.8.6 The proposed development would replace a number of smaller buildings including a<br />
number of storage containers <strong>and</strong> a modular building. It is considered that the<br />
replacement of these structures <strong>with</strong> one larger building would improve the visual<br />
amenity of the site, <strong>and</strong> given the location of the site <strong>with</strong>in the wider estate, would<br />
not impact significantly on the open character <strong>and</strong> visual amenity of the green belt<br />
over <strong>and</strong> above that of the existing buildings on the application site <strong>and</strong> the<br />
remainder of the estate.<br />
2.8.7 The building would be finished <strong>with</strong> brickwork <strong>and</strong> cladding to the elevations <strong>and</strong> the<br />
roof would be constructed of insulated profiled metal sheeting. A condition is<br />
recommended requiring full details <strong>and</strong> samples of the proposed materials to be<br />
submitted <strong>and</strong> approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority prior to the<br />
commencement of the development.<br />
2.8.8 It is considered, therefore, that the proposed development would not appear as a<br />
prominent feature <strong>and</strong> would not have an unacceptable impact on the character <strong>and</strong><br />
appearance of the area or on the openness of the Green Belt in accordance <strong>with</strong><br />
the NPPF <strong>and</strong> policies ENV 1, GB4 <strong>and</strong> EMP9 of the local plan.<br />
233