02.07.2014 Views

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Report Reference Number: 2012/0401/FUL <strong>Agenda</strong> Item No: 5.4<br />

___________________________________________________________________<br />

To:<br />

Planning Committee<br />

Date: 12 September 2012<br />

Author:<br />

Nancy Thynne<br />

Lead Officer:<br />

Dylan Jones (Business Manager)<br />

__________________________________________________________ _______<br />

APPLICATION<br />

NUMBER:<br />

2012/0401/FUL PARISH:<br />

Sherburn Upon Elmet<br />

APPLICANT:<br />

G W Sissons &<br />

Son Ltd<br />

VALID DATE: 26 April 2012<br />

PROPOSAL:<br />

LOCATION:<br />

EXPIRY DATE: 21 June 2012<br />

Application for maintenance workshop <strong>and</strong> storage building,<br />

including compound for external storage.<br />

L<strong>and</strong> adjacent Units 11-14, Bypass Park Estate, Sherburn in<br />

Elmet<br />

The above application is referred to the Planning Committee for a Decision as it is a<br />

Departure from the Development Plan as it is contrary to Policy GB2.<br />

Summary:<br />

The proposal is considered to be acceptable in principle <strong>and</strong> would accord <strong>with</strong> the<br />

requirements of the National Planning Policy Framework in relation to limited<br />

developments/infill buildings in the greenbelt. The proposal represents the provision of a<br />

relatively small scale development which would support the existing Bypass Park Estate. It<br />

is considered that the proposed development would not have an unacceptable detrimental<br />

impact on the character <strong>and</strong> appearance of the area, nor would it unacceptably impact on<br />

the openness of the greenbelt. The proposal would not adversely affect highway safety<br />

<strong>and</strong> would not compromise the operating conditions of other surrounding properties.<br />

Recommendations:<br />

This application is recommended to be APPROVED subject to conditions detailed at<br />

paragraph 2.13 of this report.<br />

1. Introduction <strong>and</strong> background<br />

1.1 The Site<br />

227

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!