02.07.2014 Views

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Elmet as being one of the most sustainable locations identified in the<br />

<strong>District</strong>.<br />

2.8.22 In light of all of the above it is concluded that the principle of housing<br />

proposed for this site (also taking into account the other applications for<br />

development of this Phase 2 site) <strong>and</strong> the quantum of development<br />

proposed are acceptable as they are in accordance <strong>with</strong> the housing<br />

numbers released as part of Policy H2A. Very limited weight can be<br />

attached to the Council decision of 13 September 2011 in terms of<br />

releasing limited numbers on this site as the SADPD on which this<br />

decision was based is now out of date. The resolution is not a material<br />

consideration to which greater weight can attach than the adopted<br />

Local Plan. In addition significant weight should be attached to the<br />

compliance of the proposals <strong>with</strong> the NPPF. It is therefore concluded<br />

that the application for residential development on this Phase 2 site is<br />

acceptable in principle <strong>and</strong> the previous reasons for refusal have been<br />

overcome, in the light of the latest policies.<br />

2.9 Highways, Access <strong>and</strong> Transportation<br />

Relationship to Existing Highway <strong>and</strong> Access<br />

2.9.1 Policy ENV1 (2) states that in considering proposals for development<br />

the Council will take account of “the relationship of the proposal to the<br />

highway network, the proposed means of access, the need for road /<br />

junction improvements in the vicinity of the site, <strong>and</strong> the arrangements<br />

to be made for car parking”. In addition, Policy T1 seeks to ensure that<br />

development proposals are well related to the existing highways<br />

network <strong>and</strong> that schemes are only permitted where existing roads<br />

have adequate capacity <strong>and</strong> can safely serve the development, unless<br />

appropriate off-site highway improvements are undertaken by the<br />

developer.<br />

2.9.2 Policy T2 outlines that development proposals which would result in the<br />

creation of a new access or the intensification of the use of an existing<br />

access will be permitted provided:<br />

1) There would be no detriment to highway safety; <strong>and</strong><br />

2) The access can be created in a location <strong>and</strong> to a<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard acceptable to the highway authority.<br />

The Policy also states that “proposals which would result in the<br />

creation of a new access onto a primary road or district distributor road<br />

will not be permitted unless there is no feasible access onto a<br />

secondary road <strong>and</strong> the highway authority is satisfied that the proposal<br />

would not create conditions prejudicial to highway safety”.<br />

2.9.3 At the site specific level, Policy SHB/1B states the proposals must<br />

make provision for:<br />

197

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!