Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...
Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ... Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...
Policy T7: Policy T8: Policy VP1: Policy RT2: Policy RT3: Policy CS6: SHB/1B: Provision for Cyclists Public Rights of Way Vehicle Parking Standards Open Space requirements for New Residential Development Formal Sport and Recreation Facilities Development Contributions to Infrastructure and Community Facilities Land for housing development between Low Street, Sherburn in Elmet 2.3 Regional Spatial Strategy Please see note at start of agenda explaining the current status of the RSS. The relevant Regional Spatial Strategy policies are: Policy YH1: Policy YH2: Policy YH6: Policy YH7: Policy ENV5: Policy ENV10: Policy T1: Policy T2: Policy T3: Policy H1: Policy H2: Policy H4: Policy H5: Overall approach and key spatial priorities Climate Change and Resource Use Local Service Centres and Rural and Coastal Areas Location of Development Energy Landscape Personal Travel Reduction and Modal Shift Parking Policy Public Transport Provision and Distribution of Housing Managing and Stepping up Supply and Delivery of Housing The Provision of Affordable Housing Housing Mix 2.4 National Guidance and Policy Please see note at start of agenda explaining the status of the NPPF. 2.5 Selby District Emerging Core Strategy to the Local Development Framework Please see note at start of agenda explaining the status of the Core Strategy. 2.6 Supplementary Planning Documents/Supplementary Planning Guidance • Development Brief – Land between Low Street and Moor Lane, Sherburn in Elmet (June 2003) • Developer Contributions – Supplementary Planning Document – Adopted March 2007 192
2.7 Key Issues • Village Design Statement – Sherburn in Elmet Having had regard to the above policies it is considered that the relevant issues in the determination of this application are: - Taking these in turn. i) Principle of the Development ii) Highways, Access and Transportation iii) Landscaping iv) Landscape Character and Visual Amenity of the Area v) Loss of Agricultural Land vi) Provision of Recreation Open Space vii) Flood Risk and Drainage viii) Biodiversity / Ecology ix) Land Contamination x) Cultural Heritage xi) Standard of Layout, Design and Materials xii) Amenity of the occupiers of Adjoining Properties xiii) Noise within Proposed Dwellings xiv) Affordable Housing xv) Community Infrastructure, Education and Local Service Provision xvi) Climate Change, Energy Efficiency and Renewables Consideration xvii) Cumulative Impacts of the Development xviii) Other Matters arising from Consultations 2.8 Principle of the Development, Comprehensive Development of the Allocation, Housing Numbers and Timescale 2.8.1 The Adopted Selby District Local Plan (SDLP) sets out that the application site sits within a Phase 2 allocation. SHB/1(B) Low Street, Sherburn in Elmet, with a total area of 39.30ha and at the time of adoption an indicative capacity of 900+ dwellings as set out in Policy H2 of the Local Plan. 2.8.2 Local Plan Housing figures were originally based on the County Structure Plan and planned for a higher rate of development than current RSS targets. The Local Plan took consideration of this planned growth and set a target of 600 dwellings per annum (dpa) and allocated land accordingly. 2.8.3 The subsequent RSS proposed an annual target of 440 dpa, much lower than the 600 dpa proposed at the start of the Local Plan in 2005. However the Local Plan Phase 2 housing allocations remain based on a higher requirement. 193
- Page 141 and 142: 2.14.2 In terms of flood risk the
- Page 143 and 144: 2.14.15 The application states that
- Page 145 and 146: 2.16.3 The Geoenvironmental Apprais
- Page 147 and 148: stage and a condition can be utilis
- Page 149 and 150: 2.19.9 In commenting on the applica
- Page 151 and 152: (b) directly related to the develop
- Page 153 and 154: Primary Care Trust 2.22.10 In terms
- Page 155 and 156: floorspace should secure at least 1
- Page 157 and 158: allocated for housing purposes. It
- Page 159 and 160: 2.26.3 The key issues in the determ
- Page 161 and 162: dwellings close to the watercourse
- Page 163 and 164: (3) highway construction details in
- Page 165 and 166: (ii) An independent Stage 2 Safety
- Page 167 and 168: Reason: To safeguard to the rights
- Page 169 and 170: Reason: In the interests of ecology
- Page 171 and 172: 171
- Page 173 and 174: efficiency and cumulative impact th
- Page 175 and 176: • Construction would be phased fr
- Page 177 and 178: The Parish Council are not sure wha
- Page 179 and 180: stronger emphasis on the delivery o
- Page 181 and 182: The Council has no evidence of any
- Page 183 and 184: The proposed development will only
- Page 185 and 186: countryside. The authority will nee
- Page 187 and 188: 1.4.20 Ramblers' Association No res
- Page 189 and 190: - Carousel Walk being opened up int
- Page 191: - Time frame for development up to
- Page 195 and 196: 2.8.10 Policy H2A was clear that th
- Page 197 and 198: Elmet as being one of the most sust
- Page 199 and 200: an assessment of the cumulative imp
- Page 201 and 202: • Adequate facilities are provide
- Page 203 and 204: 2.9.31 As such the scheme is consid
- Page 205 and 206: • A linear belt of green space re
- Page 207 and 208: The proposals are therefore conside
- Page 209 and 210: watercourses. Furthermore flow atte
- Page 211 and 212: granted subject to conditions to pr
- Page 213 and 214: is in “outline” form details of
- Page 215 and 216: protected during the construction s
- Page 217 and 218: In light of the above, Officers wou
- Page 219 and 220: 2.22.13 The scheme does not include
- Page 221 and 222: Objectors have raised concerns rela
- Page 223 and 224: would provide financial contributio
- Page 225 and 226: 225
- Page 227 and 228: Report Reference Number: 2012/0401/
- Page 229 and 230: land adjacent to units 11-14 on the
- Page 231 and 232: 2.5.1 Please see note at start of a
- Page 233 and 234: 2.8.2 Policy EMP9 of the local plan
- Page 235 and 236: contamination or other environmenta
- Page 237 and 238: 5.1 Planning Application file refer
- Page 239 and 240: 239
- Page 241 and 242: Having reviewed the revised scheme
2.7 Key Issues<br />
• Village Design Statement – Sherburn in Elmet<br />
Having had regard to the above policies it is considered that the relevant issues<br />
in the determination of this application are: -<br />
Taking these in turn.<br />
i) Principle of the Development<br />
ii) Highways, Access <strong>and</strong> Transportation<br />
iii) L<strong>and</strong>scaping<br />
iv) L<strong>and</strong>scape Character <strong>and</strong> Visual Amenity of the Area<br />
v) Loss of Agricultural L<strong>and</strong><br />
vi) Provision of Recreation Open Space<br />
vii) Flood Risk <strong>and</strong> Drainage<br />
viii) Biodiversity / Ecology<br />
ix) L<strong>and</strong> Contamination<br />
x) Cultural Heritage<br />
xi) St<strong>and</strong>ard of Layout, Design <strong>and</strong> Materials<br />
xii) Amenity of the occupiers of Adjoining Properties<br />
xiii) Noise <strong>with</strong>in Proposed Dwellings<br />
xiv) Affordable Housing<br />
xv) Community Infrastructure, Education <strong>and</strong> Local Service<br />
Provision<br />
xvi) Climate Change, Energy Efficiency <strong>and</strong> Renewables<br />
Consideration<br />
xvii) Cumulative Impacts of the Development<br />
xviii) Other Matters arising from Consultations<br />
2.8 Principle of the Development, Comprehensive Development of the<br />
Allocation, Housing Numbers <strong>and</strong> Timescale<br />
2.8.1 The Adopted <strong>Selby</strong> <strong>District</strong> Local Plan (SDLP) sets out that the<br />
application site sits <strong>with</strong>in a Phase 2 allocation. SHB/1(B) Low Street,<br />
Sherburn in Elmet, <strong>with</strong> a total area of 39.30ha <strong>and</strong> at the time of<br />
adoption an indicative capacity of 900+ dwellings as set out in Policy<br />
H2 of the Local Plan.<br />
2.8.2 Local Plan Housing figures were originally based on the County<br />
Structure Plan <strong>and</strong> planned for a higher rate of development than<br />
current RSS targets. The Local Plan took consideration of this planned<br />
growth <strong>and</strong> set a target of 600 dwellings per annum (dpa) <strong>and</strong> allocated<br />
l<strong>and</strong> accordingly.<br />
2.8.3 The subsequent RSS proposed an annual target of 440 dpa, much<br />
lower than the 600 dpa proposed at the start of the Local Plan in 2005.<br />
However the Local Plan Phase 2 housing allocations remain based on<br />
a higher requirement.<br />
193