Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...
Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ... Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...
- Removal of mature trees and the dyke running where the proposed opening is to be developed would be detrimental. Amenity of the occupiers of Adjoining Properties - Several bungalows on Carousel Walk are mainly occupied by people in their seventies and eighties who have chosen to retire in a quiet, safe location. - Life will be disrupted by the high number of vehicles accessing a new estate via Carousel Walk. - Construction of cycle and foot path adjacent to Fairfield Link creates privacy and security issues. - Development beyond Carousel Walk and Fairfield Link it make living there like a building site for years to come - A few additional houses could be added onto end of Carousel Walk cul-de-sac not as a entrance to a new estate - Existing properties will loose sun light. - Loss of amenity. - Pollution from increased traffic coming into the village. Flood Risk and Drainage - Significant propensity for the land proposed to become saturated when there is a period of persistent rain. - Should the building go ahead the water will be pushed back towards Pasture Close and Pasture Court putting these areas at risk of flooding. Biodiversity / Ecology - The wildlife will disappear along with the hedgerow. - Children will lose the opportunity for fishing in the stream. - Dog walkers will lose yet another route away from public footpaths to walk their dogs. - There is the consideration for the wildlife in the area. - Regularly get hedgehogs, pheasants and bats feeding in and around houses. If this development goes ahead then the habitats for all the animals will be ruined. Education - Concerns over education and school capacity. - Requirement to provide a new primary school to deal with the influx of children. Surely this is still the case and a simple change of use of some land adjacent to Athelstan school will not fulfil the need. Carbon Reduction - Code for sustainable homes should be incorporated into the scheme. Other matters - Depreciation of house values. - Statement of Community Involvement by the developer was poor. 190
- Time frame for development up to 12 years to complete will maximise disruption. - It seems negligent to consider any of these applications in isolation without considering the impacts of other developments (in Sherburn and surrounding areas) which are likely to occur or be considered during the period from now up until 2026/2027. - Currently have problems with getting doctors/dentists appointments, car parking in the village centre, school places and lack of activities for children. These issues will only get worse. - The village already has a population rapidly approaching that of Tadcaster which has much more in the way of facilities. - The train station is already packed out by 7am so how on earth would this demand be met? Not only is there very limited parking but there is only two carriages on the train during rush hour. This increase would mean many commuters would struggle to get to work on time. - Police station is named by volunteers. - There are no recycling facilities 2.0 The Report 2.1 Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 states "if regard is to be had to the development plan for the purpose of any determination to be made under the planning Acts the determination must be made in accordance with the plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise". The development plan for the Selby District comprises the policies in the Selby District Local Plan (adopted on 8 February 2005) saved by the direction of the Secretary of State and the Regional Spatial Strategy for Yorkshire and the Humber (adopted 2008). ). Whilst the SoS has indicated his intention to abolish the RS, it remains part of the statutory development plan and weight can be attached to it. 2.2 Selby District Local Plan Please see note at start of agenda explaining the current status of the Local Plan. The relevant Selby District Local Plan Policies are: Policy ENV1: Policy ENV2: Policy ENV20: Policy ENV21: Policy ENV28: Policy H1: Policy H2A: Policy H2B: Policy T1: Policy T2: Policy T6: Control of Development. Environmental Pollution and Contaminated Land Landscaping Requirements Landscaping Requirements Other Archaeological Remains Housing Land Requirement Managing the Release of Housing Land Housing Density Development in relation to the Highway Network Access to Roads Public Transport 191
- Page 139 and 140: is no reason why the likely landsca
- Page 141 and 142: 2.14.2 In terms of flood risk the
- Page 143 and 144: 2.14.15 The application states that
- Page 145 and 146: 2.16.3 The Geoenvironmental Apprais
- Page 147 and 148: stage and a condition can be utilis
- Page 149 and 150: 2.19.9 In commenting on the applica
- Page 151 and 152: (b) directly related to the develop
- Page 153 and 154: Primary Care Trust 2.22.10 In terms
- Page 155 and 156: floorspace should secure at least 1
- Page 157 and 158: allocated for housing purposes. It
- Page 159 and 160: 2.26.3 The key issues in the determ
- Page 161 and 162: dwellings close to the watercourse
- Page 163 and 164: (3) highway construction details in
- Page 165 and 166: (ii) An independent Stage 2 Safety
- Page 167 and 168: Reason: To safeguard to the rights
- Page 169 and 170: Reason: In the interests of ecology
- Page 171 and 172: 171
- Page 173 and 174: efficiency and cumulative impact th
- Page 175 and 176: • Construction would be phased fr
- Page 177 and 178: The Parish Council are not sure wha
- Page 179 and 180: stronger emphasis on the delivery o
- Page 181 and 182: The Council has no evidence of any
- Page 183 and 184: The proposed development will only
- Page 185 and 186: countryside. The authority will nee
- Page 187 and 188: 1.4.20 Ramblers' Association No res
- Page 189: - Carousel Walk being opened up int
- Page 193 and 194: 2.7 Key Issues • Village Design S
- Page 195 and 196: 2.8.10 Policy H2A was clear that th
- Page 197 and 198: Elmet as being one of the most sust
- Page 199 and 200: an assessment of the cumulative imp
- Page 201 and 202: • Adequate facilities are provide
- Page 203 and 204: 2.9.31 As such the scheme is consid
- Page 205 and 206: • A linear belt of green space re
- Page 207 and 208: The proposals are therefore conside
- Page 209 and 210: watercourses. Furthermore flow atte
- Page 211 and 212: granted subject to conditions to pr
- Page 213 and 214: is in “outline” form details of
- Page 215 and 216: protected during the construction s
- Page 217 and 218: In light of the above, Officers wou
- Page 219 and 220: 2.22.13 The scheme does not include
- Page 221 and 222: Objectors have raised concerns rela
- Page 223 and 224: would provide financial contributio
- Page 225 and 226: 225
- Page 227 and 228: Report Reference Number: 2012/0401/
- Page 229 and 230: land adjacent to units 11-14 on the
- Page 231 and 232: 2.5.1 Please see note at start of a
- Page 233 and 234: 2.8.2 Policy EMP9 of the local plan
- Page 235 and 236: contamination or other environmenta
- Page 237 and 238: 5.1 Planning Application file refer
- Page 239 and 240: 239
- Removal of mature trees <strong>and</strong> the dyke running where the proposed<br />
opening is to be developed would be detrimental.<br />
Amenity of the occupiers of Adjoining Properties<br />
- Several bungalows on Carousel Walk are mainly occupied by<br />
people in their seventies <strong>and</strong> eighties who have chosen to retire in<br />
a quiet, safe location.<br />
- Life will be disrupted by the high number of vehicles accessing a<br />
new estate via Carousel Walk.<br />
- Construction of cycle <strong>and</strong> foot path adjacent to Fairfield Link<br />
creates privacy <strong>and</strong> security issues.<br />
- Development beyond Carousel Walk <strong>and</strong> Fairfield Link it make<br />
living there like a building site for years to come<br />
- A few additional houses could be added onto end of Carousel Walk<br />
cul-de-sac not as a entrance to a new estate<br />
- Existing properties will loose sun light.<br />
- Loss of amenity.<br />
- Pollution from increased traffic coming into the village.<br />
Flood Risk <strong>and</strong> Drainage<br />
- Significant propensity for the l<strong>and</strong> proposed to become saturated<br />
when there is a period of persistent rain.<br />
- Should the building go ahead the water will be pushed back<br />
towards Pasture Close <strong>and</strong> Pasture Court putting these areas at<br />
risk of flooding.<br />
Biodiversity / Ecology<br />
- The wildlife will disappear along <strong>with</strong> the hedgerow.<br />
- Children will lose the opportunity for fishing in the stream.<br />
- Dog walkers will lose yet another route away from public footpaths<br />
to walk their dogs.<br />
- There is the consideration for the wildlife in the area.<br />
- Regularly get hedgehogs, pheasants <strong>and</strong> bats feeding in <strong>and</strong><br />
around houses. If this development goes ahead then the habitats<br />
for all the animals will be ruined.<br />
Education<br />
- Concerns over education <strong>and</strong> school capacity.<br />
- Requirement to provide a new primary school to deal <strong>with</strong> the influx<br />
of children. Surely this is still the case <strong>and</strong> a simple change of use<br />
of some l<strong>and</strong> adjacent to Athelstan school will not fulfil the need.<br />
Carbon Reduction<br />
- Code for sustainable homes should be incorporated into the<br />
scheme.<br />
Other matters<br />
- Depreciation of house values.<br />
- Statement of Community Involvement by the developer was poor.<br />
190