02.07.2014 Views

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- Carousel Walk being opened up into a "through road", will allow<br />

speeding down Carousel Walk <strong>with</strong> little regard for those around<br />

them <strong>and</strong> mini traffic jams will occur due to cars being parked on<br />

the roadside.<br />

- The Fairway is already used as a ‘rat-run’ by those looking to avoid<br />

the traffic lights in Sherburn village centre <strong>and</strong> at peak times that<br />

traffic is often seen to be exceeding safe speeds on roads intended<br />

originally only for estate traffic.<br />

- It is only a matter of time before the combination of excessive<br />

speed <strong>and</strong> congestion produces a serious traffic incident<br />

- Minimum road width is under guideline of 6.10m according to DFT.<br />

- Development should be accessed from either Low Street or the<br />

A162 by-pass.<br />

- Traffic lights in the village centre can barely cope <strong>with</strong> the volume<br />

of traffic now.<br />

- traffic data that was collected/collated in December 2011 should<br />

not be taken as an accurate record of the traffic flow.<br />

- Concern that whoever conducted survey has made calculations for<br />

the traffic lights based on there being non-blocking storage of 3<br />

vehicles on Finkle Hill <strong>and</strong> Low Street (ie there can be 3 vehicles<br />

waiting to turn right at the lights <strong>and</strong> there is still room for another<br />

vehicle to pass on the inside). In reality the non-blocking storage is<br />

zero.<br />

- There are fundamental errors in the transport assessment which<br />

was submitted in support of the application by DPP.<br />

- Would ask that the link road is required to be constructed under a<br />

S106 agreement (applied to all consents, if given) as soon as<br />

works start on site.<br />

- Insufficient ‘safe’ crossing areas for the pedestrian.<br />

- Sir John's Lane is not capable of taking the volume of traffic at the<br />

moment never mind the additional vehicles that will come when the<br />

next phase of building works will bring.<br />

- Link road would be a positive proposal, however MacGay Wayne<br />

Ltd shows on their plans the spur roads linking up to create through<br />

roads on their development. This would not alleviate traffic from the<br />

existing Fairway/Pasture Estate but would increase it tremendously<br />

by creating rat runs from the proposed new developments along<br />

Fairfield Link <strong>and</strong> Carousel Walk into the Fairway.<br />

- Quite a few home owners have to back their cars onto the street<br />

because of the very poor design when the houses were originally<br />

built<br />

L<strong>and</strong>scaping including impact on L<strong>and</strong>scape Character <strong>and</strong> Visual<br />

Amenity of the Area<br />

- Expansion of the village will spoil the character of the place<br />

- The open outlook from Carousel Walk will be lost.<br />

- At the bottom of Carousel Walk there is a stunning tree <strong>and</strong><br />

greenery, this would all have to go.<br />

- The road would have to pass over a watercourse<br />

189

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!