Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...
Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ... Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...
The development site is in a now de-designated Site of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC), less than 1.5 kilometres from the Sherburn Willows SSSI and the Sherburn Willows Nature Reserve which is managed by the Yorkshire Wildlife Trust. The development site is therefore important for biodiversity and adequate mitigation is essential. The surveys and ecological assessment appear to have been done correctly and at appropriate times of the year. However we have comments on the following aspect of the development: Proximity to Sherburn Willows Nature Reserve and SSSI The Environmental Impact Statement acknowledges that the proposed development is unlikely to have an effect on water resources and visual receptors, including water resources and nature conservation desingations, however we do not believe enough consideration has taken place regarding visitor pressure placed on Sherburn Willows Nature Reserve if the three planned developments proceed. Therefore we believe the following measures are necessary: • The provision of well designed open spaces within the development area itself for the exercising of dogs and community use so that Sherburn Willows is protected to some extent from excessive pressure; • The Trust would like to see a part time reserve officer funded who could co-ordinate with local residents and provide information and interpretation of the reserve and the surrounding area. Interpretation signage which would indicate the importance and value of the reserve would be welcomed. New residents could then understand the reserve’s value and how wildlife can be protected. • The developers could also fund membership of the Yorkshire Wildlife Trust for new residents which would aid understanding of local wildlife and the reserve. • The Trust would be happy to discuss options with the developer. The cumulative effect of the development and its location at Sherburn in Elmet We feel there should be more emphasis in Chapter 13 of the Environmental Statement: Conclusions on the cumulative impact of the proposed development. The addition of over 700 dwellings to Sherburn has a considerable impact by itself and its future impact in combination with other potential residential developments to meet local housing targets should be considered at this stage. Water Vole Protection Surveys for other developments have revealed active use of the ditches and watercourse neighbouring the site by water voles. We believe that the proposed development needs to take the following into consideration to avoid negative impacts on water vole: • As stated in the Ecology Chapter connectivity of ditches into the wider landscape will be very important so that water vole populations are maintained on the site and surrounding 184
countryside. The authority will need to ensure that conditions are imposed so that ditches are maintained and managed in a way compatible with other developments. There may also be opportunities to provide habitat for water vole through the development of SUDS and wetland areas. • Protection of ditches with well managed hedgerows containing thorny native species. • The trust would want a condition that a management plan for ditches is in place for the lifetime of the development. Conditions would also be needed to ensure that ditches in the adjacent potential development provide connectivity for wildlife beyond the Carousel Walk development. Hedgerow Protection The Trust is pleased that existing boundary hedgerows will be improved, appropriate long term management will be necessary so their value is maintained. The following points will be important: • A 5m buffer from the base of hedgerows should be retained on both sides of all hedgerows to maintain biodiversity value. • No hedgerows should be incorporated in individual gardens • Hedgerows be managed in perpetuity not just for five years. • Gapping up of hedgerows with native species it is recommended that 70-80% prickly species be used. • A hedgerow management scheme be agreed with NYCC ecologists and Yorkshire Wildlife Trust. Green Space within the Development The quality and extent of green spaces associated with this development has particular importance given the likely pressures on Sherburn Willows Nature Reserve. The trust is pleased to see that a traditional hayfield mix is suggested for grassland areas. As the Trust has a number of magnesium limestone grassland reserves near to Sherburn it would be possible to provide green hay to create BAP habitat. It is therefore recommended that a management plan is required so that the green spaces continue to provide benefits for biodiversity into the future. The management plan will need to be funded and provide details of how different habitats will be cared for so that their value for wildlife is maintained and if species rich grassland is created appropriate management will be required and a condition to this effect will be required. 1.4.13 Lead Officer-Environmental Health (LO-EH) The development should comply with Policy ENV5 of the Regional Spatial Strategy, I have not located any information in relation to the application which relates to this issue and would recommend that a condition be attached should permission be granted. I am aware that there are previous agricultural uses of the site and other contaminative uses within 250m of the site as identified in the 185
- Page 133 and 134: 2.9.19 The Travel Plan Framework se
- Page 135 and 136: Phase 1 development on Moor Lane, w
- Page 137 and 138: 2.10.6 In addition, Paragraph 58 of
- Page 139 and 140: is no reason why the likely landsca
- Page 141 and 142: 2.14.2 In terms of flood risk the
- Page 143 and 144: 2.14.15 The application states that
- Page 145 and 146: 2.16.3 The Geoenvironmental Apprais
- Page 147 and 148: stage and a condition can be utilis
- Page 149 and 150: 2.19.9 In commenting on the applica
- Page 151 and 152: (b) directly related to the develop
- Page 153 and 154: Primary Care Trust 2.22.10 In terms
- Page 155 and 156: floorspace should secure at least 1
- Page 157 and 158: allocated for housing purposes. It
- Page 159 and 160: 2.26.3 The key issues in the determ
- Page 161 and 162: dwellings close to the watercourse
- Page 163 and 164: (3) highway construction details in
- Page 165 and 166: (ii) An independent Stage 2 Safety
- Page 167 and 168: Reason: To safeguard to the rights
- Page 169 and 170: Reason: In the interests of ecology
- Page 171 and 172: 171
- Page 173 and 174: efficiency and cumulative impact th
- Page 175 and 176: • Construction would be phased fr
- Page 177 and 178: The Parish Council are not sure wha
- Page 179 and 180: stronger emphasis on the delivery o
- Page 181 and 182: The Council has no evidence of any
- Page 183: The proposed development will only
- Page 187 and 188: 1.4.20 Ramblers' Association No res
- Page 189 and 190: - Carousel Walk being opened up int
- Page 191 and 192: - Time frame for development up to
- Page 193 and 194: 2.7 Key Issues • Village Design S
- Page 195 and 196: 2.8.10 Policy H2A was clear that th
- Page 197 and 198: Elmet as being one of the most sust
- Page 199 and 200: an assessment of the cumulative imp
- Page 201 and 202: • Adequate facilities are provide
- Page 203 and 204: 2.9.31 As such the scheme is consid
- Page 205 and 206: • A linear belt of green space re
- Page 207 and 208: The proposals are therefore conside
- Page 209 and 210: watercourses. Furthermore flow atte
- Page 211 and 212: granted subject to conditions to pr
- Page 213 and 214: is in “outline” form details of
- Page 215 and 216: protected during the construction s
- Page 217 and 218: In light of the above, Officers wou
- Page 219 and 220: 2.22.13 The scheme does not include
- Page 221 and 222: Objectors have raised concerns rela
- Page 223 and 224: would provide financial contributio
- Page 225 and 226: 225
- Page 227 and 228: Report Reference Number: 2012/0401/
- Page 229 and 230: land adjacent to units 11-14 on the
- Page 231 and 232: 2.5.1 Please see note at start of a
- Page 233 and 234: 2.8.2 Policy EMP9 of the local plan
The development site is in a now de-designated Site of Importance for<br />
Nature Conservation (SINC), less than 1.5 kilometres from the<br />
Sherburn Willows SSSI <strong>and</strong> the Sherburn Willows Nature Reserve<br />
which is managed by the Yorkshire Wildlife Trust. The development<br />
site is therefore important for biodiversity <strong>and</strong> adequate mitigation is<br />
essential. The surveys <strong>and</strong> ecological assessment appear to have<br />
been done correctly <strong>and</strong> at appropriate times of the year. However we<br />
have comments on the following aspect of the development:<br />
Proximity to Sherburn Willows Nature Reserve <strong>and</strong> SSSI<br />
The Environmental Impact Statement acknowledges that the proposed<br />
development is unlikely to have an effect on water resources <strong>and</strong> visual<br />
receptors, including water resources <strong>and</strong> nature conservation<br />
desingations, however we do not believe enough consideration has<br />
taken place regarding visitor pressure placed on Sherburn Willows<br />
Nature Reserve if the three planned developments proceed. Therefore<br />
we believe the following measures are necessary:<br />
• The provision of well designed open spaces <strong>with</strong>in the development<br />
area itself for the exercising of dogs <strong>and</strong> community use so that<br />
Sherburn Willows is protected to some extent from excessive<br />
pressure;<br />
• The Trust would like to see a part time reserve officer funded who<br />
could co-ordinate <strong>with</strong> local residents <strong>and</strong> provide information <strong>and</strong><br />
interpretation of the reserve <strong>and</strong> the surrounding area.<br />
Interpretation signage which would indicate the importance <strong>and</strong><br />
value of the reserve would be welcomed. New residents could then<br />
underst<strong>and</strong> the reserve’s value <strong>and</strong> how wildlife can be protected.<br />
• The developers could also fund membership of the Yorkshire<br />
Wildlife Trust for new residents which would aid underst<strong>and</strong>ing of<br />
local wildlife <strong>and</strong> the reserve.<br />
• The Trust would be happy to discuss options <strong>with</strong> the developer.<br />
The cumulative effect of the development <strong>and</strong> its location at Sherburn<br />
in Elmet<br />
We feel there should be more emphasis in Chapter 13 of the<br />
Environmental Statement: Conclusions on the cumulative impact of the<br />
proposed development. The addition of over 700 dwellings to<br />
Sherburn has a considerable impact by itself <strong>and</strong> its future impact in<br />
combination <strong>with</strong> other potential residential developments to meet local<br />
housing targets should be considered at this stage.<br />
Water Vole Protection<br />
Surveys for other developments have revealed active use of the<br />
ditches <strong>and</strong> watercourse neighbouring the site by water voles. We<br />
believe that the proposed development needs to take the following into<br />
consideration to avoid negative impacts on water vole:<br />
• As stated in the Ecology Chapter connectivity of ditches into the<br />
wider l<strong>and</strong>scape will be very important so that water vole<br />
populations are maintained on the site <strong>and</strong> surrounding<br />
184