Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...
Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ... Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...
1.1.5 Vegetation within the site is limited, with no physical boundary to the east with the western boundary being timber fenced rear gardens and brick gable ends of detached single storey garages and a dwelling on Fairfield Link with the northern boundary formed by bushes and a water course beyond which timber fences form the boundary of rear gardens; and a small watercourse runs along the southern boundary. 1.1.6 An informal path runs alongside the southern boundary set 4-5m into the site from the watercourse and continues east through the remainder of the Phase 2 site with an unmade public right of way (footpath number 35.57/32) following the line of the northern boundary, some 4-5m to the south of the watercourse and this also continues east through the remainder of the Phase 2 site. 1.1.7 The site sits predominantly within Flood Zone 1 with a small section along the eastern boundary within Flood Zone 2. 1.2. The Proposal 1.2.1 Applications for outline permission do not require as much detail as full applications but must still include information on use, the amount of development, indicative layout, scale parameters and indicative access points. Matters such as access, appearance, landscaping, layout and scale can be approved at a later stage by a reserved matters application. 1.2.2 This submission is an outline application for the construction of 120 dwellings with all matters reserved for future approval. 1.2.3 The supporting information for the application sets out the design parameters which form a link between outline consent and consideration of reserved matters and although not subject to detailed assessment at this stage need to be taken into consideration to ensure that the site can be developed in line with policy. The design parameters indicated in the Environmental Statement are as follows: • Access based on the utilisation of Fairfield Link and/or Carousel Walk. • The development will provide 120 dwellings. • The density would be 30 dwellings per hectare (including open space) • Floor levels to be a minimum of 600mm above modelled flood level from Selby Dam Flood Mapping Study 2008, or 300mm above existing ground level whichever is higher. • Majority of dwellings being 2 storey but some having room in the roofspace, typically 2.5 storey. • Properties ranging in height from 7m above Ordnance Survey Datum for two storey properties to a maximum height of 10m for 2.5 storey properties. 174
• Construction would be phased from west to east and all material will be retained and reused on-site during construction. • Work could commence on site March 2012 with completion by late 2016. 1.2.4 The indicative layout plan submitted shows the potential road arrangement with two potential access roads through to the Phase 2 development to the east. 1.2.5 The indicative layout plan also shows potential areas for landscaping and recreational open space. 1.3 Planning History 1.3.1 An outline application (CO/1992/1011) for residential development was Refused on 19 November 1992 due to the site being outside an area allocated for residential purposes and due to there being an adequate housing land supply. 1.3.2 An application (CO/1998/0147) for the erection of 100 dwellings and car parking/garage spaces, together with associated public open space, cycleway and highway infrastructure was to be refused, however the application was appealed due to non determination on 12 January 1999. The appeal was subsequently dismissed as it was considered premature to develop the site for housing as it would prejudice the emerging Local Plan and there was a sufficient 5 year housing land supply demonstrated. 1.3.3 The site was allocated in the 2005 Selby District Local Plan following consideration of the site through the Local Plan process. The site is allocated as a Phase 2 Housing Allocation reference SHB/1B. 1.3.4 On the 2 nd February 2012 a refusal was issued in relation to Application 2011/0893/EIA for 498 dwellings on part of the Phase 2 site located to the south of the application site. 1.3.5 An appeal has been lodged to the Planning Inspectorate in relation to this Refusal and the Appeal has been called in by the Secretary of State. The Appeal is expected to be heard in November/December 2012. 1.3.6 An outline application (reference 2012/0399/EIA) (accompanied by an Environmental Statement) for the erection of a residential development of 100 no. dwellings to include access on Phase 2 land on land between Moor Lane and Low Street (to the east of the application site) is pending consideration. This application is the subject of a separate report. 1.3.7 An outline application (reference 2012/0400/EIA) (accompanied by an Environmental Statement) for the construction of 498 dwellings to 175
- Page 123 and 124: determination must be made in accor
- Page 125 and 126: xvi) xvii) xviii) Climate Change, E
- Page 127 and 128: the Regional Spatial Strategy Polic
- Page 129 and 130: 2.9.1 Policy ENV1 (2) states that i
- Page 131 and 132: 2.9.10 In addition the report confi
- Page 133 and 134: 2.9.19 The Travel Plan Framework se
- Page 135 and 136: Phase 1 development on Moor Lane, w
- Page 137 and 138: 2.10.6 In addition, Paragraph 58 of
- Page 139 and 140: is no reason why the likely landsca
- Page 141 and 142: 2.14.2 In terms of flood risk the
- Page 143 and 144: 2.14.15 The application states that
- Page 145 and 146: 2.16.3 The Geoenvironmental Apprais
- Page 147 and 148: stage and a condition can be utilis
- Page 149 and 150: 2.19.9 In commenting on the applica
- Page 151 and 152: (b) directly related to the develop
- Page 153 and 154: Primary Care Trust 2.22.10 In terms
- Page 155 and 156: floorspace should secure at least 1
- Page 157 and 158: allocated for housing purposes. It
- Page 159 and 160: 2.26.3 The key issues in the determ
- Page 161 and 162: dwellings close to the watercourse
- Page 163 and 164: (3) highway construction details in
- Page 165 and 166: (ii) An independent Stage 2 Safety
- Page 167 and 168: Reason: To safeguard to the rights
- Page 169 and 170: Reason: In the interests of ecology
- Page 171 and 172: 171
- Page 173: efficiency and cumulative impact th
- Page 177 and 178: The Parish Council are not sure wha
- Page 179 and 180: stronger emphasis on the delivery o
- Page 181 and 182: The Council has no evidence of any
- Page 183 and 184: The proposed development will only
- Page 185 and 186: countryside. The authority will nee
- Page 187 and 188: 1.4.20 Ramblers' Association No res
- Page 189 and 190: - Carousel Walk being opened up int
- Page 191 and 192: - Time frame for development up to
- Page 193 and 194: 2.7 Key Issues • Village Design S
- Page 195 and 196: 2.8.10 Policy H2A was clear that th
- Page 197 and 198: Elmet as being one of the most sust
- Page 199 and 200: an assessment of the cumulative imp
- Page 201 and 202: • Adequate facilities are provide
- Page 203 and 204: 2.9.31 As such the scheme is consid
- Page 205 and 206: • A linear belt of green space re
- Page 207 and 208: The proposals are therefore conside
- Page 209 and 210: watercourses. Furthermore flow atte
- Page 211 and 212: granted subject to conditions to pr
- Page 213 and 214: is in “outline” form details of
- Page 215 and 216: protected during the construction s
- Page 217 and 218: In light of the above, Officers wou
- Page 219 and 220: 2.22.13 The scheme does not include
- Page 221 and 222: Objectors have raised concerns rela
- Page 223 and 224: would provide financial contributio
1.1.5 Vegetation <strong>with</strong>in the site is limited, <strong>with</strong> no physical boundary to the<br />
east <strong>with</strong> the western boundary being timber fenced rear gardens <strong>and</strong><br />
brick gable ends of detached single storey garages <strong>and</strong> a dwelling on<br />
Fairfield Link <strong>with</strong> the northern boundary formed by bushes <strong>and</strong> a water<br />
course beyond which timber fences form the boundary of rear gardens;<br />
<strong>and</strong> a small watercourse runs along the southern boundary.<br />
1.1.6 An informal path runs alongside the southern boundary set 4-5m into<br />
the site from the watercourse <strong>and</strong> continues east through the<br />
remainder of the Phase 2 site <strong>with</strong> an unmade public right of way<br />
(footpath number 35.57/32) following the line of the northern boundary,<br />
some 4-5m to the south of the watercourse <strong>and</strong> this also continues<br />
east through the remainder of the Phase 2 site.<br />
1.1.7 The site sits predominantly <strong>with</strong>in Flood Zone 1 <strong>with</strong> a small section<br />
along the eastern boundary <strong>with</strong>in Flood Zone 2.<br />
1.2. The Proposal<br />
1.2.1 <strong>Applications</strong> for outline permission do not require as much detail as full<br />
applications but must still include information on use, the amount of<br />
development, indicative layout, scale parameters <strong>and</strong> indicative access<br />
points. Matters such as access, appearance, l<strong>and</strong>scaping, layout <strong>and</strong><br />
scale can be approved at a later stage by a reserved matters<br />
application.<br />
1.2.2 This submission is an outline application for the construction of 120<br />
dwellings <strong>with</strong> all matters reserved for future approval.<br />
1.2.3 The supporting information for the application sets out the design<br />
parameters which form a link between outline consent <strong>and</strong><br />
consideration of reserved matters <strong>and</strong> although not subject to detailed<br />
assessment at this stage need to be taken into consideration to ensure<br />
that the site can be developed in line <strong>with</strong> policy. The design<br />
parameters indicated in the Environmental Statement are as follows:<br />
• Access based on the utilisation of Fairfield Link <strong>and</strong>/or Carousel<br />
Walk.<br />
• The development will provide 120 dwellings.<br />
• The density would be 30 dwellings per hectare (including open<br />
space)<br />
• Floor levels to be a minimum of 600mm above modelled flood level<br />
from <strong>Selby</strong> Dam Flood Mapping Study 2008, or 300mm above<br />
existing ground level whichever is higher.<br />
• Majority of dwellings being 2 storey but some having room in the<br />
roofspace, typically 2.5 storey.<br />
• Properties ranging in height from 7m above Ordnance Survey<br />
Datum for two storey properties to a maximum height of 10m for 2.5<br />
storey properties.<br />
174