02.07.2014 Views

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Phase 1 development on Moor Lane, which will require some<br />

improvements to the public right of way, then the scheme is acceptable<br />

<strong>and</strong> accords <strong>with</strong> Policy.<br />

Car Parking <strong>with</strong>in the Scheme<br />

2.9.32 The detailed site layout will be considered as part of the required<br />

reserved matters submissions should outline consent be granted.<br />

2.9.33 The submitted Design & Access Statement sets out under Section 5<br />

under “Amount <strong>and</strong> Layout” that parking provision will be in line <strong>with</strong><br />

the Local Plan policies, through a variety of solutions from integral<br />

garages, garages <strong>with</strong>in the curtilage of the dwelling or parking courts.<br />

The indicative plans demonstrate that sufficient parking can be<br />

achieved <strong>with</strong>in the site in order to comply <strong>with</strong> policy.<br />

2.9.34 NYCC Highways have confirmed that “the local Highway Authority's<br />

current parking design guide still refers to maximum parking st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

<strong>and</strong> they underst<strong>and</strong> this document was also adopted by <strong>Selby</strong> DC. In<br />

line <strong>with</strong> national guidance, maximum st<strong>and</strong>ards are no longer<br />

considered appropriate for new residential development. Parking levels<br />

should therefore be agreed <strong>with</strong> the Local Highways Authority (as in<br />

NYCC) <strong>and</strong> the Local Planning Authority rather than applying the<br />

'maximum' parking st<strong>and</strong>ards in the existing guidance”.<br />

2.9.35 On this basis it is considered that delivery of detailed car parking<br />

arrangements can be confirmed at the reserved matters stage as part<br />

of the layout <strong>and</strong> as such the scheme is acceptable.<br />

Car Parking in the Village Centre<br />

2.9.36 Objectors have stated that there is a lack of parking in the village<br />

centre which is already constrained. The developers have not<br />

proposed any contribution towards improvements to the provision of<br />

car parking in the town centre as part of the submission.<br />

2.9.37 NYCC Highways <strong>and</strong> SDC Planning Officers have reviewed the lack of<br />

such improvements <strong>and</strong> consider that the site is in a sustainable<br />

location so people will not always drive to the village centre. As such it<br />

is not considered reasonable to require the developer to enhance or<br />

contribute to the enhancement of parking provision in the village<br />

centre.<br />

2.9.38 On this basis it is considered that the scheme is acceptable <strong>and</strong> no<br />

contribution or requirement for improvements to be made to the town<br />

centre car parking can or should be required from the development as<br />

any such requirements would be contrary to Circular Guidance in<br />

11/95.<br />

Conclusion on Highways, Access <strong>and</strong> Transportation<br />

135

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!