Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...
Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ... Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...
- Walking up the shops is a joy as it is currently, as it is easy to get to, the amount of vehicular activity is still tolerable, the choice of shops covers most goods and is a relaxed, and social event – many people having lived in Sherburn for years, know each other and the community spirit is there, where people look out of each other. - Village was not designed to have this number of properties. - Development will result in no green belt land being left around Sherburn. - Where will the open space be for people to walk around the village? - Large fields provide a nice vista around Sherburn. - Sherburn is beginning to feel like a concrete jungle. - Development will bring about the destruction of valuable and productive agricultural land. - Abandoned development along Moor Lane had a detrimental effect on the appearance of Sherburn. Amenity of the occupiers of Adjoining Properties - Area will be ruined by the development. - The applicant’s statement of the visual impact of this development on properties adjoining the site this is both misleading and inaccurate. Leaving aside the questionable comment about ground floor views, the suggestion that “some views may be possible from first floor windows” is just plain wrong. - There is an obvious case for siting bungalows along the boundary of this site where it adjoins existing properties. - Houses would be clearly visible from our gardens and ground floor rooms and first floor rooms. The suggestion of limiting the houses at our immediate rear to two storey dwellings is wholly inadequate in addressing this concern. If the land was flat then this would go some way to dealing with the issue but a simple visual inspection shows that this is not the case. - The proposed development period is far too long and given that these developers have already blighted Sherburn for 4 years, to allow a further 8 year period for this development to take place constitutes an unreasonable burden on local residents. Alternatively, the developers should be instructed to complete all development within an 18 month period. It is simply unfair for local residents to have to endure more than 10 years of noise, dirt and disturbance to sate the shareholders of Redrow and Persimmon’s greed. - It is likely that property will be overshadowed and overlooked as the estate design suggests that these properties may well be over 2 stories high which will affect the amenity and privacy of garden and house. - The bus provisions to the village are constantly being cut by the providers and pale in contrast to those provided from Tadcaster. - The local area receives a huge volume in high speed motorbike traffic to the local Squires cafe bar. 120
- The Sherburn village centre is already a bottleneck with the traffic levels at peak hours and there has been little enough investment in the village. - Satnav directs people along the B1222 not along the routes proposed in the application. - Development would create a sleeper community but would suffer with added traffic. - Views from rear at ground and first floor will be lost due to higher land level at the rear and this will be regardless of the size of the development at the rear. - No indication on how the development will be constructed, in what phases and when. - Already been subject to disturbance with the Persimmon development on Moor Lane. Flood Risk and Drainage - Building a large amount of houses will result in land ability to drain rainwater being compromised. - No details for surface water run off have been included to prove that the area can cope with the additional pressure on the drainage system. - Roads in the village flood during heavy rain. - Significant propensity for the land proposed to become saturated when there is anything like a period of persistent rain. - Should the building go ahead the water will be pushed back towards Pasture Close and Pasture Court putting these areas at risk of flooding. Biodiversity / Ecology - Bats can be seen flying in the area at dusk. - Village have increased amount of pollution. - Pheasants breed and live on land that the development will be on. - Lap wings live on the site. - Development at eastern end of Moor Lane will ruin natural habitat for water voles and crested newts. - Trees should not be removed to allow the development. Education - Proposed extension to Athlestan primary school may not be sufficient as Monk Fryston and South Milford primary schools are already at capacity. - Schools will not be able to cope will result in larger class sizes. Facilities - No indoor facilities for children so hang around the village causing a disturbance and nuisance. - There are insufficient facilities to sustain the existing population let alone a 1000 to 1500 increase. 121
- Page 69 and 70: carried out in accordance with the
- Page 71 and 72: earlier in this Report seeking use
- Page 73 and 74: 2.17.8 In conclusion, it is conside
- Page 75 and 76: The indicative plans submitted demo
- Page 77 and 78: infrastructure) and came into force
- Page 79 and 80: 2.22.9 As such the scheme is consid
- Page 81 and 82: 2.23 Climate Change, Energy Efficie
- Page 83 and 84: have raised the need for affordable
- Page 85 and 86: ii) affordable housing provision, r
- Page 87 and 88: climate change flood event. Details
- Page 89 and 90: The agreed drawings must be approve
- Page 91 and 92: No dwellings shall be constructed w
- Page 95 and 96: Public Session Report Reference Num
- Page 97 and 98: Low Street to the south of the vill
- Page 99 and 100: Reason for Refusal 1 The proposal b
- Page 101 and 102: • The increase in numbers of resi
- Page 103 and 104: of adoption an indicative capacity
- Page 105 and 106: • Types and Sizes - Affordable Ho
- Page 107 and 108: and that further clarification/evid
- Page 109 and 110: ecording a condition should be appe
- Page 111 and 112: • The provision of well designed
- Page 113 and 114: presented as an Appendix within the
- Page 115 and 116: We support the proposed preservatio
- Page 117 and 118: - When travelling around Leeds and
- Page 119: - The traffic projections are woefu
- Page 123 and 124: determination must be made in accor
- Page 125 and 126: xvi) xvii) xviii) Climate Change, E
- Page 127 and 128: the Regional Spatial Strategy Polic
- Page 129 and 130: 2.9.1 Policy ENV1 (2) states that i
- Page 131 and 132: 2.9.10 In addition the report confi
- Page 133 and 134: 2.9.19 The Travel Plan Framework se
- Page 135 and 136: Phase 1 development on Moor Lane, w
- Page 137 and 138: 2.10.6 In addition, Paragraph 58 of
- Page 139 and 140: is no reason why the likely landsca
- Page 141 and 142: 2.14.2 In terms of flood risk the
- Page 143 and 144: 2.14.15 The application states that
- Page 145 and 146: 2.16.3 The Geoenvironmental Apprais
- Page 147 and 148: stage and a condition can be utilis
- Page 149 and 150: 2.19.9 In commenting on the applica
- Page 151 and 152: (b) directly related to the develop
- Page 153 and 154: Primary Care Trust 2.22.10 In terms
- Page 155 and 156: floorspace should secure at least 1
- Page 157 and 158: allocated for housing purposes. It
- Page 159 and 160: 2.26.3 The key issues in the determ
- Page 161 and 162: dwellings close to the watercourse
- Page 163 and 164: (3) highway construction details in
- Page 165 and 166: (ii) An independent Stage 2 Safety
- Page 167 and 168: Reason: To safeguard to the rights
- Page 169 and 170: Reason: In the interests of ecology
- The Sherburn village centre is already a bottleneck <strong>with</strong> the traffic<br />
levels at peak hours <strong>and</strong> there has been little enough investment in<br />
the village.<br />
- Satnav directs people along the B1222 not along the routes<br />
proposed in the application.<br />
- Development would create a sleeper community but would suffer<br />
<strong>with</strong> added traffic.<br />
- Views from rear at ground <strong>and</strong> first floor will be lost due to higher<br />
l<strong>and</strong> level at the rear <strong>and</strong> this will be regardless of the size of the<br />
development at the rear.<br />
- No indication on how the development will be constructed, in what<br />
phases <strong>and</strong> when.<br />
- Already been subject to disturbance <strong>with</strong> the Persimmon<br />
development on Moor Lane.<br />
Flood Risk <strong>and</strong> Drainage<br />
- Building a large amount of houses will result in l<strong>and</strong> ability to drain<br />
rainwater being compromised.<br />
- No details for surface water run off have been included to prove<br />
that the area can cope <strong>with</strong> the additional pressure on the drainage<br />
system.<br />
- Roads in the village flood during heavy rain.<br />
- Significant propensity for the l<strong>and</strong> proposed to become saturated<br />
when there is anything like a period of persistent rain.<br />
- Should the building go ahead the water will be pushed back<br />
towards Pasture Close <strong>and</strong> Pasture Court putting these areas at<br />
risk of flooding.<br />
Biodiversity / Ecology<br />
- Bats can be seen flying in the area at dusk.<br />
- Village have increased amount of pollution.<br />
- Pheasants breed <strong>and</strong> live on l<strong>and</strong> that the development will be on.<br />
- Lap wings live on the site.<br />
- Development at eastern end of Moor Lane will ruin natural habitat<br />
for water voles <strong>and</strong> crested newts.<br />
- Trees should not be removed to allow the development.<br />
Education<br />
- Proposed extension to Athlestan primary school may not be<br />
sufficient as Monk Fryston <strong>and</strong> South Milford primary schools are<br />
already at capacity.<br />
- Schools will not be able to cope will result in larger class sizes.<br />
Facilities<br />
- No indoor facilities for children so hang around the village causing<br />
a disturbance <strong>and</strong> nuisance.<br />
- There are insufficient facilities to sustain the existing population let<br />
alone a 1000 to 1500 increase.<br />
121
Change language