Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

The Planning Officer presented a report which has been referred to the
Planning Committee as it is a Departure from the Development Plan as it is
contrary to Policy H2A.
The Planning Officer explained that the application sought full planning
permission for the erection of a detached dwelling with detached double
garage which would replace an extant consent for the erection of one dwelling
and detached double garage on this plot.
The Planning Officer explained that the development of the site for the
erection of one dwelling would be considered acceptable in principle, despite
the proposals not being in accordance with Policy H2A, limited weight should
be attached to the non compliance with Policy H2A and significant weight
should be attached to the clear fall back position in the form of the extant
planning permission, the proposals not causing harm to the local area and
compliance with the NPPF and as such the proposals were considered
acceptable in principle.
The Committee debated the application and a vote was taken.
RESOLVED:
i) To receive and note the report.
ii) To APPROVE the application subject to the conditions
detailed at Paragraph 2.16 in the report.
13.6 Application: 2012/0228/FUL
Location: Blue Bell Inn, 86 Main Street,
Monk Fryston
Proposal: Change of use of existing public house to
single dwelling and erection of a single dwelling
and double garage.
The Planning Officer presented a report which has been referred to the due to
the request of a Ward Councillor. The reasons given for this request were
detailed in the report.
The Planning Officer explained that the application sought planning consent
for the change of use of the Public House in to a dwelling and the erection of
a single dwelling and double garage to the rear of the site.
The Planning Officer explained that the proposal was considered to be
acceptable in principle and would accord with polices H2A and H6 of the
Selby District Local Plan. It was explained that the proposal would sustain and
enhance an important building within the Conservation Area which was
supported by the NPPF. The Committee were informed that the proposal
would not adversely affect the character of the area or the Conservation Area
nor would the proposal significantly adversely affect the residential amenity of
neighbouring properties. The Planning Officer explained that the proposal
would not adversely affect Highway safety or effect protected species. It was
Planning Committee
25 July 2012 12