Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...
Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ... Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...
- There are very few buses into Leeds and the one that does go on the hour takes so many diversions it takes far too long for it to be a feasible option to the car. No service on a Sunday. - The roads and pavement have little repairs undertaken on them. - The present eastern roundabout on the ring-road will also be potentially overwhelmed, particularly if the industrial estate expansion goes ahead and feeds yet more HGVs onto that very busy roundabout? - Parking provision at Sherburn and South Milford station is inadequate. - Statutory duty upon SDC to ensure that developments like this one enhance not degrade highway conditions. - Traffic surveys are in progress and it is disturbing that the sensor placed at Low Street and New Lane is so close to the junction that it will provide seriously misleading data on traffic flow and speed. Having taken expert advice from a professional in the field am advised that the installers were either incompetent, or trying to obtain a particular false picture. - Deferring the developers responsibility to provide infrastructure will worsen the problem whilst maximising profits. - Sherburn-in-Elmet already has a road accident record nearly twice the national average. - The plans indicate that new bus stops are to be provided on Low Street, but not pull-ins, so buses stopping and starting will be an additional hazard. - As part of the original application for 498 homes Redrow/ Persimmon said they would provide a link road between Low Street and Moor Lane “when traffic number and movements warrant it”. The lack of a link to part of the site became a reason for refusal of the original application. Redrow/Persimmon have now come back and said that “it is proposed to provide a link road”, but they are no more specific than the commitment given last year – clearly this is another area where nothing has changed. - Needs a strategy for construction traffic so the village is not affected. Building the link road at the start would avoid this problem as construction traffic could approach from the by pass and residents of the new houses would then be able to use the same route therefore saving Sherburn centre and South Milford from traffic problems. - The Transport Assessment prepared by Optima for Redrow/Persimmon shows a surprisingly low 8% of the traffic generated by their proposed development heading west on the B1222 (Table 6.6). They show most Leeds bound traffic heading south into South Milford and into Leeds that way (overall they show 46.2% of the traffic heading south and 53.8% heading north). That is very puzzling because it is longer (by 3km) and slower than using the B1222; none of us, nor any Sherburn resident we have spoken to, would use the route described by Optima. 118
- The traffic projections are woefully inadequate and assume that approximately 1/3 or new households will own and use a car which is clearly ludicrous. - There is an assumption that a significant number of households will cycle or walk to local train stations, however what train will they be catching? - People park on Beech Grove when the co-op car park is full, resulted in the grass verge being destroyed. - A road could be built from Sir John’s Lane to Finkle Hill to alleviate traffic congestion. - Rights of way will be affected along with the public footpaths that are heavily used by walkers. - Children crossing Low Street do not use crossings and location of the bus stop will increase road safety risk. - Link road should be developed prior to the construction of the development to allow construction to move along the bypass and link road to the development site. - Low Street is heavily used by HGV’s especially from Mytum & Selby skip hire. - Independent road survey is required to determine level of traffic and impact of using the estate roads as a rat run. - Development will result in a loss of privacy. - Disruption will be high if the development takes 15 years to complete, concern over dust. - Sherburn already has a higher than average ratio of affordable housing to homeowners. - ‘current policy’ to erect a percentage of such buildings, we believe that, especially given the latest house build and negative rumours surrounding the impact the ‘affordable housing’ is having on other house prices, the overall reputation for Sherburn and on public services, we feel that more lower cost properties are not desirable, both to Sherburn and it’s current community, or the average home owner. - Increased traffic during the construction of the development will result in an additional hundred vehicles a week coming into Sherburn. - Bus stop will not have a pull in so will cause safety issues on the busy road. - Allocation of 1 and half parking spaces per property is not sufficient. - Journeys will involve the car not public transport. - Police have been involved in relation to parking issue on Rose Avenue associated with the parking of vehicles on the school run. Landscaping including impact on Landscape Character and Visual Amenity of the Area - Sherburn because it was a lovely village with lots of countryside around, are we now going to be left with an urban sprawl. 119
- Page 67 and 68: ii. and a site-specific flood risk
- Page 69 and 70: carried out in accordance with the
- Page 71 and 72: earlier in this Report seeking use
- Page 73 and 74: 2.17.8 In conclusion, it is conside
- Page 75 and 76: The indicative plans submitted demo
- Page 77 and 78: infrastructure) and came into force
- Page 79 and 80: 2.22.9 As such the scheme is consid
- Page 81 and 82: 2.23 Climate Change, Energy Efficie
- Page 83 and 84: have raised the need for affordable
- Page 85 and 86: ii) affordable housing provision, r
- Page 87 and 88: climate change flood event. Details
- Page 89 and 90: The agreed drawings must be approve
- Page 91 and 92: No dwellings shall be constructed w
- Page 95 and 96: Public Session Report Reference Num
- Page 97 and 98: Low Street to the south of the vill
- Page 99 and 100: Reason for Refusal 1 The proposal b
- Page 101 and 102: • The increase in numbers of resi
- Page 103 and 104: of adoption an indicative capacity
- Page 105 and 106: • Types and Sizes - Affordable Ho
- Page 107 and 108: and that further clarification/evid
- Page 109 and 110: ecording a condition should be appe
- Page 111 and 112: • The provision of well designed
- Page 113 and 114: presented as an Appendix within the
- Page 115 and 116: We support the proposed preservatio
- Page 117: - When travelling around Leeds and
- Page 121 and 122: - The Sherburn village centre is al
- Page 123 and 124: determination must be made in accor
- Page 125 and 126: xvi) xvii) xviii) Climate Change, E
- Page 127 and 128: the Regional Spatial Strategy Polic
- Page 129 and 130: 2.9.1 Policy ENV1 (2) states that i
- Page 131 and 132: 2.9.10 In addition the report confi
- Page 133 and 134: 2.9.19 The Travel Plan Framework se
- Page 135 and 136: Phase 1 development on Moor Lane, w
- Page 137 and 138: 2.10.6 In addition, Paragraph 58 of
- Page 139 and 140: is no reason why the likely landsca
- Page 141 and 142: 2.14.2 In terms of flood risk the
- Page 143 and 144: 2.14.15 The application states that
- Page 145 and 146: 2.16.3 The Geoenvironmental Apprais
- Page 147 and 148: stage and a condition can be utilis
- Page 149 and 150: 2.19.9 In commenting on the applica
- Page 151 and 152: (b) directly related to the develop
- Page 153 and 154: Primary Care Trust 2.22.10 In terms
- Page 155 and 156: floorspace should secure at least 1
- Page 157 and 158: allocated for housing purposes. It
- Page 159 and 160: 2.26.3 The key issues in the determ
- Page 161 and 162: dwellings close to the watercourse
- Page 163 and 164: (3) highway construction details in
- Page 165 and 166: (ii) An independent Stage 2 Safety
- Page 167 and 168: Reason: To safeguard to the rights
- There are very few buses into Leeds <strong>and</strong> the one that does go on<br />
the hour takes so many diversions it takes far too long for it to be a<br />
feasible option to the car. No service on a Sunday.<br />
- The roads <strong>and</strong> pavement have little repairs undertaken on them.<br />
- The present eastern roundabout on the ring-road will also be<br />
potentially overwhelmed, particularly if the industrial estate<br />
expansion goes ahead <strong>and</strong> feeds yet more HGVs onto that very<br />
busy roundabout?<br />
- Parking provision at Sherburn <strong>and</strong> South Milford station is<br />
inadequate.<br />
- Statutory duty upon SDC to ensure that developments like this one<br />
enhance not degrade highway conditions.<br />
- Traffic surveys are in progress <strong>and</strong> it is disturbing that the sensor<br />
placed at Low Street <strong>and</strong> New Lane is so close to the junction that<br />
it will provide seriously misleading data on traffic flow <strong>and</strong> speed.<br />
Having taken expert advice from a professional in the field am<br />
advised that the installers were either incompetent, or trying to<br />
obtain a particular false picture.<br />
- Deferring the developers responsibility to provide infrastructure will<br />
worsen the problem whilst maximising profits.<br />
- Sherburn-in-Elmet already has a road accident record nearly twice<br />
the national average.<br />
- The plans indicate that new bus stops are to be provided on Low<br />
Street, but not pull-ins, so buses stopping <strong>and</strong> starting will be an<br />
additional hazard.<br />
- As part of the original application for 498 homes Redrow/<br />
Persimmon said they would provide a link road between Low Street<br />
<strong>and</strong> Moor Lane “when traffic number <strong>and</strong> movements warrant it”.<br />
The lack of a link to part of the site became a reason for refusal of<br />
the original application. Redrow/Persimmon have now come back<br />
<strong>and</strong> said that “it is proposed to provide a link road”, but they are no<br />
more specific than the commitment given last year – clearly this is<br />
another area where nothing has changed.<br />
- Needs a strategy for construction traffic so the village is not<br />
affected. Building the link road at the start would avoid this problem<br />
as construction traffic could approach from the by pass <strong>and</strong><br />
residents of the new houses would then be able to use the same<br />
route therefore saving Sherburn centre <strong>and</strong> South Milford from<br />
traffic problems.<br />
- The Transport Assessment prepared by Optima for<br />
Redrow/Persimmon shows a surprisingly low 8% of the traffic<br />
generated by their proposed development heading west on the<br />
B1222 (Table 6.6). They show most Leeds bound traffic heading<br />
south into South Milford <strong>and</strong> into Leeds that way (overall they show<br />
46.2% of the traffic heading south <strong>and</strong> 53.8% heading north). That<br />
is very puzzling because it is longer (by 3km) <strong>and</strong> slower than using<br />
the B1222; none of us, nor any Sherburn resident we have spoken<br />
to, would use the route described by Optima.<br />
118