Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...
Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ... Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...
contamination and given the sensitivity of the groundwater we would prefer to see connection to mains drainage. The Environment Agency’s comments are based on the understanding that the applicants are connecting to mains drainage for foul as stipulated in the information submitted within this planning application. If this is not the case the Environment Agency would wish to be reconsulted. We are likely to object until sufficient evidence has been submitted to state why mains drainage has not bee the preferred method of foul drainage. The applicants will need to undertake a non mains drainage assessment to satisfy the Agency. 1.4.10 Yorkshire Water Services Ltd No objections subject to conditions being attached in order to protect the local aquatic environment and Yorkshire Water Infrastructure. 1.4.11 Selby Area Internal Drainage Board Details on the application indicate that surface water could potentially be directed to various surface water systems. The Council will need to be satisfied that all the existing systems or new systems have sufficient capacity to accommodate all additional flows on completion of the development. Also the Council will need to be satisfied that all systems downstream from the main have sufficient capacity. It is essential the developer discusses in detail the method and rate of disposal of surface water run-off from the development. Surface water from the site will eventually enter systems maintained by the Internal Drainage Board. Subject to the Council including a condition with respect to the above it is unlikely the Internal Drainage Board would pass any other comment. 1.4.12 Yorkshire Wildlife Trust (YWT) The development site is partially in a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC), less than a kilometre from the Sherburn Willows SSI and the Sherburn Willows Nature Reserve which is managed by the Yorkshire Wildlife Trust, and there are also a number of species and habitats within the site which are valuable for nature conservation. The development site is therefore important for biodiversity and adequate mitigation is essential. The surveys and ecological assessment appear to have been done correctly and at appropriate times of the year. However we have comments on the following aspect of the development: Proximity to Sherburn Willows Nature Reserve and SSSI We welcome the measures taken in the EIA to avoid changes in local drainage and abstraction which would affect the SSSI, however we do not believe enough consideration has taken place regarding visitor pressure placed on Sherburn Willows Nature Reserve. Therefore we believe the following measures are necessary: 110
• The provision of well designed open spaces within the development area itself for the exercising of dogs and community use so that Sherburn Willows is protected to some extent from excessive pressure; • The Trust would like to see a part time reserve officer funded who could co-ordinate with local residents and provide information and interpretation of the reserve and the surrounding area. Interpretation signage which would indicate the importance and value of the reserve would be welcomed. New residents could then understand the reserve’s value and how wildlife can be protected. • The developers could also fund membership of the Yorkshire Wildlife Trust for new residents which would aid understanding of local wildlife and the reserve. • The Trust would be happy to discuss options with the developer. The cumulative effect of the development and its location at Sherburn in Elmet We feel there should be more emphasis in Chapter 13 of the Environmental Statement (Summary of Effects and Conclusions) on the cumulative impact of the proposed development. The proposal has a considerable impact and its future impact in combination with other potential residential developments to meet local housing targets should be considered at this stage. We can agree with the ES reasoning that the development of a Phase 2 and 3 allocated site to meet housing requirements at this location will reduce the development pressure on nearby sensitive sites but only in terms of direct land take. This development is likely to exert considerable pressure on Sherburn Willow Nature Reserve and more accountability should be taken of this indirect negative impact of the development on such sensitive areas, and subsequent measures taken to mitigate against such impacts in so far as practicable. Water Vole Protection As acknowledged in the Water Vole Survey chapter of the Environmental Impact Statement the site has been shown to have a population of water vole and the ditches have high value for water vole. Surveys revealed active use of the ditches and watercourse neighbouring the site by water voles. The development needs to take into consideration connectivity of ditches, provision of habitat for water vole through SUDS and wetland, protection of ditches with well managed hedgerow containing thorny native species to protect water vole and avoid negative impacts. The Trust would want a condition that a management plan for ditches is in place, referencing the above document and sufficiently funded for the lifetime of the development Hedgerow Protection With regard to planned creation of new hedgerow along the south of the site and other panned hedgerows it would be recommended that a 5m buffer should be retained both sides of all hedgerows on the edge of the development, no hedgerows incorporated in individual gardens, 111
- Page 59 and 60: 2.9.33 NYCC Highways have confirmed
- Page 61 and 62: 2.10.5 At a regional level the RSS
- Page 63 and 64: 2.11.5 The report concludes that th
- Page 65 and 66: 10) An appropriate flood risk asses
- Page 67 and 68: ii. and a site-specific flood risk
- Page 69 and 70: carried out in accordance with the
- Page 71 and 72: earlier in this Report seeking use
- Page 73 and 74: 2.17.8 In conclusion, it is conside
- Page 75 and 76: The indicative plans submitted demo
- Page 77 and 78: infrastructure) and came into force
- Page 79 and 80: 2.22.9 As such the scheme is consid
- Page 81 and 82: 2.23 Climate Change, Energy Efficie
- Page 83 and 84: have raised the need for affordable
- Page 85 and 86: ii) affordable housing provision, r
- Page 87 and 88: climate change flood event. Details
- Page 89 and 90: The agreed drawings must be approve
- Page 91 and 92: No dwellings shall be constructed w
- Page 95 and 96: Public Session Report Reference Num
- Page 97 and 98: Low Street to the south of the vill
- Page 99 and 100: Reason for Refusal 1 The proposal b
- Page 101 and 102: • The increase in numbers of resi
- Page 103 and 104: of adoption an indicative capacity
- Page 105 and 106: • Types and Sizes - Affordable Ho
- Page 107 and 108: and that further clarification/evid
- Page 109: ecording a condition should be appe
- Page 113 and 114: presented as an Appendix within the
- Page 115 and 116: We support the proposed preservatio
- Page 117 and 118: - When travelling around Leeds and
- Page 119 and 120: - The traffic projections are woefu
- Page 121 and 122: - The Sherburn village centre is al
- Page 123 and 124: determination must be made in accor
- Page 125 and 126: xvi) xvii) xviii) Climate Change, E
- Page 127 and 128: the Regional Spatial Strategy Polic
- Page 129 and 130: 2.9.1 Policy ENV1 (2) states that i
- Page 131 and 132: 2.9.10 In addition the report confi
- Page 133 and 134: 2.9.19 The Travel Plan Framework se
- Page 135 and 136: Phase 1 development on Moor Lane, w
- Page 137 and 138: 2.10.6 In addition, Paragraph 58 of
- Page 139 and 140: is no reason why the likely landsca
- Page 141 and 142: 2.14.2 In terms of flood risk the
- Page 143 and 144: 2.14.15 The application states that
- Page 145 and 146: 2.16.3 The Geoenvironmental Apprais
- Page 147 and 148: stage and a condition can be utilis
- Page 149 and 150: 2.19.9 In commenting on the applica
- Page 151 and 152: (b) directly related to the develop
- Page 153 and 154: Primary Care Trust 2.22.10 In terms
- Page 155 and 156: floorspace should secure at least 1
- Page 157 and 158: allocated for housing purposes. It
- Page 159 and 160: 2.26.3 The key issues in the determ
• The provision of well designed open spaces <strong>with</strong>in the development<br />
area itself for the exercising of dogs <strong>and</strong> community use so that<br />
Sherburn Willows is protected to some extent from excessive<br />
pressure;<br />
• The Trust would like to see a part time reserve officer funded who<br />
could co-ordinate <strong>with</strong> local residents <strong>and</strong> provide information <strong>and</strong><br />
interpretation of the reserve <strong>and</strong> the surrounding area.<br />
Interpretation signage which would indicate the importance <strong>and</strong><br />
value of the reserve would be welcomed. New residents could then<br />
underst<strong>and</strong> the reserve’s value <strong>and</strong> how wildlife can be protected.<br />
• The developers could also fund membership of the Yorkshire<br />
Wildlife Trust for new residents which would aid underst<strong>and</strong>ing of<br />
local wildlife <strong>and</strong> the reserve.<br />
• The Trust would be happy to discuss options <strong>with</strong> the developer.<br />
The cumulative effect of the development <strong>and</strong> its location at Sherburn<br />
in Elmet<br />
We feel there should be more emphasis in Chapter 13 of the<br />
Environmental Statement (Summary of Effects <strong>and</strong> Conclusions) on<br />
the cumulative impact of the proposed development. The proposal has<br />
a considerable impact <strong>and</strong> its future impact in combination <strong>with</strong> other<br />
potential residential developments to meet local housing targets should<br />
be considered at this stage. We can agree <strong>with</strong> the ES reasoning that<br />
the development of a Phase 2 <strong>and</strong> 3 allocated site to meet housing<br />
requirements at this location will reduce the development pressure on<br />
nearby sensitive sites but only in terms of direct l<strong>and</strong> take. This<br />
development is likely to exert considerable pressure on Sherburn<br />
Willow Nature Reserve <strong>and</strong> more accountability should be taken of this<br />
indirect negative impact of the development on such sensitive areas,<br />
<strong>and</strong> subsequent measures taken to mitigate against such impacts in so<br />
far as practicable.<br />
Water Vole Protection<br />
As acknowledged in the Water Vole Survey chapter of the<br />
Environmental Impact Statement the site has been shown to have a<br />
population of water vole <strong>and</strong> the ditches have high value for water vole.<br />
Surveys revealed active use of the ditches <strong>and</strong> watercourse<br />
neighbouring the site by water voles. The development needs to take<br />
into consideration connectivity of ditches, provision of habitat for water<br />
vole through SUDS <strong>and</strong> wetl<strong>and</strong>, protection of ditches <strong>with</strong> well<br />
managed hedgerow containing thorny native species to protect water<br />
vole <strong>and</strong> avoid negative impacts. The Trust would want a condition<br />
that a management plan for ditches is in place, referencing the above<br />
document <strong>and</strong> sufficiently funded for the lifetime of the development<br />
Hedgerow Protection<br />
With regard to planned creation of new hedgerow along the south of<br />
the site <strong>and</strong> other panned hedgerows it would be recommended that a<br />
5m buffer should be retained both sides of all hedgerows on the edge<br />
of the development, no hedgerows incorporated in individual gardens,<br />
111