Agenda with Maps and Applications (21Mb) - pdf - Selby District ...

We can state with 100% certainty that neither Bryan G Hall, NYCC or
Optima can produce video footage demonstrating that this approach
can handle the amount of traffic they are claiming.
A further response was received on 22 August 2012:
The Parish Council confirm the comments submitted by Councillor Paul
Doherty on 7 August 2012 are the views of the Parish Council and
expect the County to provide a response to the issues raised. If the
County has evidence that the views we have expressed in relation to
highways issues are wrong they must reveal this information. If they
cannot dispute the points we raise and do nothing to address the
issues then that is maladministration.
We remain concerned about the plans for educational provision for
Sherburn and we are not convinced that the County Council has had
regard to all potential future developments in the village. We rely on
the Officers to ensure the County’s proposals are robust and to
challenge them if they are not.
The Parish Council are not sure what funds will be available or when
but additional funds for the benefit of the community are essential if
such a large development is allowed. There are various projects
ongoing at present.
The 106 Agreement should provide as wide as possible a definition for
the use of 106 money so it can be spent on whatever the village
needs. This might not be recreational open space but may include
contributions to various projects currently underway in the village
including improvements to the village centre, the opening up and
improvement of Sherburn High School facilities to the wider community
and improvements within Eversley Park, including potential youth
provision. Clearly without knowing how much money will be available
and when, it is impossible to be specific but the lack of facilities is there
for all to see and if there is to be development improvements are
essential through developer contributions.
1.4.2 Selby District Council - Development Policy
Local Plan Housing figures were originally based on the County
Structure Plan and planned for a higher rate of development than
current RSS targets.
The Local Plan took consideration of this planned growth and set a
target of 600 dwellings per annum (dpa) and allocated land
accordingly. The subsequent RSS proposed an annual target of 440
dpa, much lower than the 600 dpa proposed at the start of the Local
Plan in 2005. However the SDLP allocations remain based on a higher
requirement. SHB/1(B) is a Phase 2 site as set out in Inset map 54 of
SDLP. The subject site sits within a Phase 2 allocation. SHB/1(B) Low
Street, Sherburn in Elmet has a total area of 39.30 (ha) and at the time
102