01.07.2014 Views

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Explor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Unknown</strong><br />

409<br />

What Priority for Apollo?<br />

As part of NASA’s buildup for <strong>the</strong> Apollo project, James Webb on 13 March<br />

1962 wrote to President Kennedy, ask<strong>in</strong>g him to assign <strong>the</strong> top government<br />

priority—called “DX”— to <strong>the</strong> lunar land<strong>in</strong>g project. To be assigned such a<br />

priority, a program had to have objectives of key political, scientific, psychological<br />

or military import. Those programs with this priority had first call on <strong>the</strong> scarce<br />

resources needed to achieve <strong>the</strong>ir goals. <strong>The</strong> President approved this request upon<br />

<strong>the</strong> recommendation of <strong>the</strong> National Aeronautics and Space Council. (II-23)<br />

One scarce resource not covered by <strong>the</strong> DX priority was money—specifically,<br />

funds with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> overall NASA budget to be allocated to ensur<strong>in</strong>g that Apollo<br />

would meet its goal of land<strong>in</strong>g Americans on <strong>the</strong> Moon before 1970. And <strong>the</strong><br />

man <strong>in</strong> charge of Apollo, Bra<strong>in</strong>erd Holmes, by mid-1962 had come to believe<br />

that <strong>the</strong> project was receiv<strong>in</strong>g enough funds, and that with additional funds not<br />

only would a lunar land<strong>in</strong>g by <strong>the</strong> end of 1967 (NASA’s plann<strong>in</strong>g target at <strong>the</strong><br />

time) be possible, but even might be accomplished earlier. As Robert Seamans<br />

observed, “by <strong>the</strong> summer of 1962, Jim [Webb] and I knew we had a problem with<br />

Bra<strong>in</strong>erd Holmes.” Holmes was a “very excit<strong>in</strong>g person for <strong>the</strong> media. He had a<br />

way of express<strong>in</strong>g himself that made news.” 29 Indeed, <strong>the</strong> 10 August issue of Time<br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>e featured Holmes on its cover and dubbed him “Apollo czar.”<br />

Holmes was seek<strong>in</strong>g an additional $400 million for Apollo for <strong>the</strong> current FY<br />

1963. <strong>The</strong>re were two ways to get <strong>the</strong>se funds. One way was to transfer <strong>the</strong>m from<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r NASA programs with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> overall NASA budget provided by Congress.<br />

<strong>The</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r was to request that amount <strong>in</strong> a supplemental appropriation from<br />

Congress. James Webb refused to approve ei<strong>the</strong>r choice, anger<strong>in</strong>g Holmes.<br />

Apparently Holmes discussed <strong>the</strong> situation directly with President Kennedy,<br />

probably dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> president’s <strong>in</strong>spection tour of <strong>the</strong> Apollo buildup on 11 and<br />

12 September, with a stress on an earlier date for <strong>the</strong> first land<strong>in</strong>g attempt. <strong>The</strong><br />

President <strong>the</strong>n asked Webb whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re was <strong>in</strong>deed a possibility of mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

lunar land<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1966 ra<strong>the</strong>r than 1967. Webb responded <strong>in</strong> late October, tell<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Kennedy “<strong>the</strong> late 1967 target date is based on a vigorous and driv<strong>in</strong>g effort, but<br />

does not represent a crash program. A late 1966 target would require a crash,<br />

high-risk effort.” Webb added that NASA was “prepared to place <strong>the</strong> manned<br />

lunar land<strong>in</strong>g program on an all-out crash basis aimed at <strong>the</strong> 1966 target date if<br />

you should decide this is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> national <strong>in</strong>terest,” but substantial and immediate<br />

budget <strong>in</strong>creases would be required. (II-32)<br />

President Kennedy had asked his Bureau of <strong>the</strong> Budget dur<strong>in</strong>g that summer<br />

to take a careful look at <strong>the</strong> actual situation with respect to <strong>the</strong> overall U.S.<br />

space program, focus<strong>in</strong>g on two questions: “<strong>the</strong> pace at which <strong>the</strong> manned lunar<br />

land<strong>in</strong>g should proceed” and “<strong>the</strong> approach that should be taken to o<strong>the</strong>r space<br />

programs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1964 budget.” Director of <strong>the</strong> Budget David Bell sent <strong>the</strong> results<br />

of <strong>the</strong> review to <strong>the</strong> President on 13 November. (Volume I, III-13) <strong>The</strong> review<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>ed four options for Apollo. <strong>The</strong> first was <strong>the</strong> current NASA plan, with no<br />

29. Seamans, Aim<strong>in</strong>g at Targets, p. 103.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!