01.07.2014 Views

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

390 Project Apollo: Americans to <strong>the</strong> Moon<br />

early January 1961; <strong>the</strong> council decided that Low should cont<strong>in</strong>ue his plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

effort. However, outgo<strong>in</strong>g NASA Adm<strong>in</strong>istrator T. Keith Glennan rem<strong>in</strong>ded Low<br />

that such a program would require presidential approval, and that approval had<br />

not been forthcom<strong>in</strong>g. Indeed, as President Dwight D. Eisenhower left office<br />

on 20 January 1961, <strong>the</strong> future of NASA’s program of human spaceflight was<br />

extremely uncerta<strong>in</strong>. <strong>The</strong>re were no funds <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> President’s f<strong>in</strong>al budget proposal<br />

to support Project Apollo, and it was known that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g President, John F.<br />

Kennedy, was receiv<strong>in</strong>g advice skeptical of <strong>the</strong> value of launch<strong>in</strong>g humans <strong>in</strong>to<br />

space. <strong>The</strong>re certa<strong>in</strong>ly was no sense that Kennedy would, with<strong>in</strong> four months,<br />

decide to send Americans to <strong>the</strong> Moon.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Decision to Go to <strong>the</strong> Moon 4<br />

As he entered <strong>the</strong> White House, President Kennedy was aware that he would<br />

be faced with decisions that would shape <strong>the</strong> future of U.S. space efforts. One<br />

of his top advisors dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> period between <strong>the</strong> election and his tak<strong>in</strong>g office,<br />

Harvard professor Richard Neustadt, told Kennedy <strong>in</strong> December 1960 that <strong>the</strong><br />

United States had been <strong>in</strong> a race for dramatic space achievements, a race that<br />

<strong>the</strong> Soviet Union was w<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g because of <strong>the</strong>ir superior space launch capability.<br />

Neustadt asked “if we are beh<strong>in</strong>d and are likely to stay beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> race for<br />

‘Sputnik-type firsts,’ should we get out of <strong>the</strong> race and divert <strong>the</strong> resources now<br />

tied up <strong>in</strong> it to o<strong>the</strong>r uses which have tangible military, scientific or welfare value?”<br />

Neustadt was skeptical of <strong>the</strong> value of <strong>the</strong> Saturn rockets, 5 which he noted were<br />

needed “only <strong>in</strong> order to put a man on <strong>the</strong> moon” before Russia, but he did support<br />

<strong>the</strong> development of a very large rocket motor (<strong>the</strong> F-1). He asked Kennedy “<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

longer run, what proportion of government resources, for what span of years,<br />

should go <strong>in</strong>to develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> technology of space travel?” (Volume I, III-4)<br />

Kennedy also appo<strong>in</strong>ted dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> transition an “Ad Hoc Committee on<br />

Space,” which was chaired by <strong>the</strong> man who would become his science advisor, MIT<br />

Professor Jerome Wiesner. This committee recognized that “manned exploration<br />

of space will certa<strong>in</strong>ly come to pass and we believe that <strong>the</strong> United States must play<br />

a vigorous role <strong>in</strong> this venture,” but that “because of our lag <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> development of<br />

large boosters, it is very unlikely that we shall be first <strong>in</strong> plac<strong>in</strong>g a man <strong>in</strong>to orbit.”<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> committee believed that too much emphasis had been placed on<br />

Project Mercury <strong>in</strong> comparison to its actual scientific and technological payoffs,<br />

and recommended that “we should stop advertis<strong>in</strong>g MERCURY as our major<br />

objective <strong>in</strong> space activities. . . . We should f<strong>in</strong>d effective means to make people<br />

appreciate <strong>the</strong> cultural, public service, and military importance of space activities<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r than [human] space travel.” (Volume I, III-5)<br />

4. Most of <strong>the</strong> account of this decision is taken from Logsdon, <strong>The</strong> Decision to Go to <strong>the</strong> Moon.<br />

This study of <strong>the</strong> Kennedy decision, published <strong>in</strong> 1970, rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> accepted version of <strong>the</strong> events<br />

lead<strong>in</strong>g to Kennedy’s 25 May 1961 announcement that “we should go to <strong>the</strong> moon.”<br />

5. At this po<strong>in</strong>t, Saturn was <strong>the</strong> name of <strong>the</strong> Wernher von Braun-led program to develop a<br />

larger booster than anyth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> United States was o<strong>the</strong>rwise plann<strong>in</strong>g, but still far short <strong>in</strong> lift<strong>in</strong>g<br />

power of what was ultimately developed as <strong>the</strong> Saturn V for <strong>the</strong> lunar land<strong>in</strong>g program.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!