01.07.2014 Views

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Explor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Unknown</strong> 273<br />

Source: Folder 18674, NASA Historical Reference Collection, NASA History<br />

Division, NASA Headquarters, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton DC.<br />

Document I-55<br />

Document Title: Eldon W. Hall, Director, Gem<strong>in</strong>i Systems Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g, NASA,<br />

to Deputy Director, Gem<strong>in</strong>i Program, NASA, “Circumlunar Missions,” 29<br />

June 1965.<br />

Source: Folder 18674, NASA Historical Reference Collection, NASA History<br />

Division, NASA Headquarters, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton DC.<br />

Document I-56<br />

Document Title: James E. Webb, Adm<strong>in</strong>istrator, NASA, to Ol<strong>in</strong> E. Teague,<br />

Chairman, Subcommittee on NASA Oversight, Committee on Science and<br />

Astronautics, House of Representatives, 10 September 1965.<br />

Source: Folder 18674, NASA Historical Reference Collection, NASA History<br />

Division, NASA Headquarters, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton DC.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g of 1964 it appeared to many senior officials at NASA that <strong>the</strong> Apollo program<br />

was stall<strong>in</strong>g and might not be able to make its deadl<strong>in</strong>e of a lunar land<strong>in</strong>g by <strong>the</strong> end of<br />

<strong>the</strong> decade. <strong>The</strong> last Mercury flight had taken place <strong>in</strong> May 1963, and Gem<strong>in</strong>i was not<br />

scheduled to fly for several months. <strong>The</strong> Saturn rocket project was hav<strong>in</strong>g difficulties, and<br />

<strong>the</strong> Apollo spacecraft development effort was lagg<strong>in</strong>g beh<strong>in</strong>d schedule. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, Wernher<br />

von Braun suggested to a reporter for Missiles and Rockets that <strong>in</strong> a cont<strong>in</strong>gency he<br />

thought Gem<strong>in</strong>i might be reconfigurable for a flight around <strong>the</strong> Moon. This story, appear<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on 18 May 1964, quoted von Braun as say<strong>in</strong>g that Gem<strong>in</strong>i could undertake a circumlunar<br />

flight “to salvage this country’s prestige if <strong>the</strong> manned lunar goal proves impossible.” Von<br />

Braun had voiced someth<strong>in</strong>g that had been bubbl<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> NASA for some time, and<br />

<strong>the</strong>reafter pressure mounted to formalize and make public efforts to evaluate <strong>the</strong> possibility<br />

of a Gem<strong>in</strong>i circumlunar flight. Throughout <strong>the</strong> summer of 1964, as <strong>the</strong>se documents<br />

show, NASA undertook <strong>in</strong>ternal studies. <strong>The</strong>y were only <strong>in</strong>ternal, for on 8 June, NASA<br />

Deputy Associate Adm<strong>in</strong>istrator Robert C. Seamans told NASA Associate Adm<strong>in</strong>istrator for<br />

Manned Spaceflight George Mueller that “any circumlunar mission studies relat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong><br />

use of Gem<strong>in</strong>i will be conf<strong>in</strong>ed to <strong>in</strong>-house study efforts.” In reality, NASA leaders had bet<br />

<strong>the</strong> future of <strong>the</strong>ir Agency on <strong>the</strong> success of Apollo. <strong>The</strong>y <strong>in</strong>tended to make Apollo succeed<br />

and any serious effort to reconfigure Gem<strong>in</strong>i as a “quick and dirty” lunar program would<br />

detract from that objective. <strong>The</strong> studies were at best halfhearted. In his 10 September 1965<br />

memorandum to Representative Ol<strong>in</strong> Teague (D-Texas), NASA Adm<strong>in</strong>istrator James E.<br />

Webb said it well,: “Our ma<strong>in</strong> objective now is to see that our basic current responsibilities<br />

are met effectively . . . <strong>the</strong> Apollo system now be<strong>in</strong>g developed can meet our requirements for<br />

knowledge and capability better than <strong>the</strong> adoption of o<strong>the</strong>r courses of action.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!