01.07.2014 Views

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Explor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Unknown</strong> 233<br />

retrofits on this flight. I did not notice any gross errors <strong>in</strong> attitude that persisted<br />

throughout retrofire. <strong>The</strong>re was some wander<strong>in</strong>g, but I feel that it was balanced<br />

out pretty well.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiation of retrofire was just a little bit late, although retrosequence<br />

came on time. I got <strong>the</strong> countdown from <strong>the</strong> California Cap Com. I waited one<br />

more second, which was 99:59:59 and did not get retrofire. I punched <strong>the</strong> manual<br />

retrofire button and one or two seconds after that I felt <strong>the</strong> first retrorocket fire.<br />

I expected a big boot from <strong>the</strong> retrorocket. But <strong>the</strong> deceleration was just<br />

a very gentle nudge. <strong>The</strong> sound of <strong>the</strong> rockets fir<strong>in</strong>g was just audible. Retrorocket<br />

Two fired on time, Retrorocket Three fired roughly on time. Each rocket gave<br />

me a sensation, not of be<strong>in</strong>g pushed back toward Hawaii as reported by John<br />

Glenn, but of be<strong>in</strong>g slowed down <strong>in</strong> three <strong>in</strong>crements. So that by <strong>the</strong> time <strong>the</strong><br />

retroacceleration was over, I felt that <strong>the</strong>re was just enough deceleration to br<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> spacecraft to a stop. I felt that, if I looked down, I would see that <strong>the</strong> obvious<br />

motion that I had seen through <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>dow and <strong>the</strong> periscope before retrofire<br />

had stopped. But, of course, it had not.<br />

I put three ‘arm’ switches on at this time. Retropack jettison occurred<br />

on time and <strong>the</strong> periscope came <strong>in</strong> on time. At this time I noticed my appall<strong>in</strong>g<br />

fuel state, and realized that I had controlled retrofire on manual and fly-by-wire. I<br />

went to rate command at this time, and tried manual and rate command, and got<br />

no response. <strong>The</strong> fuel gauge was read<strong>in</strong>g about 6 percent, but it was empty. This<br />

left me with 15 percent on <strong>the</strong> automatic system to last out <strong>the</strong> ten m<strong>in</strong>utes to .05g<br />

and to control reentry.<br />

If <strong>the</strong> California Cap Com had not mentioned <strong>the</strong> retroattitude bypass<br />

switch, I th<strong>in</strong>k I would have forgotten it, and retrofire would have been delayed<br />

considerably longer. He also mentioned an Aux Damp reentry which I th<strong>in</strong>k I<br />

would have chosen <strong>in</strong> any case, but it was a good suggestion to have. He was worth<br />

his weight <strong>in</strong> gold for just those two items.<br />

<strong>The</strong> period prior to <strong>the</strong> .05g was a harried one, because I did not know<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> fuel was go<strong>in</strong>g to hold out. <strong>The</strong> periscope [3-4] was retracted. <strong>The</strong><br />

attitude <strong>in</strong>dicators were useless. <strong>The</strong> only attitude reference I had was <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>dow.<br />

I did not have much fuel to squander at this po<strong>in</strong>t hold<strong>in</strong>g attitude. I did use it,<br />

g<strong>in</strong>gerly, try<strong>in</strong>g to keep <strong>the</strong> horizon <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>dow so that I would have a correct<br />

attitude reference. I stayed on fly-by-wire until .05g. At .05g I th<strong>in</strong>k I still had about<br />

15 percent read<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> autofuel gage.<br />

I began to get <strong>the</strong> hiss<strong>in</strong>g outside <strong>the</strong> spacecraft that John Glenn<br />

mentioned. I feel that <strong>the</strong> spacecraft would have reentered properly without any<br />

attitude control. It was aligned with<strong>in</strong> 3 or 4 degrees <strong>in</strong> pitch and yaw at <strong>the</strong> start<br />

of <strong>the</strong> reentry period. My feel<strong>in</strong>g is that <strong>the</strong> gradual <strong>in</strong>crease of aerodynamic<br />

damp<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> reentry is sufficient to align <strong>the</strong> spacecraft properly.<br />

Very shortly after .05g I began to pick up <strong>the</strong> oscillations on <strong>the</strong> pitch<br />

and yaw rate needles. At this time I th<strong>in</strong>k roll rate was zero, or possibly one or<br />

two degrees. <strong>The</strong> spacecraft oscillated back and forth about zero, just <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!