01.07.2014 Views

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

758<br />

Project Apollo: Americans to <strong>the</strong> Moon<br />

a. Announcement of a sound program for <strong>the</strong> con t<strong>in</strong>ued analysis of<br />

lunar materials already obta<strong>in</strong>ed. Such a [7] program would have a great scientific<br />

value, and would also cont<strong>in</strong>ue f<strong>in</strong>ancial support to <strong>the</strong> scientists <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> lunar<br />

analysis, who would o<strong>the</strong>rwise be out of a job.<br />

b. Initiation of a small effort toward Jupiter orbiters and probes<br />

(“Pioneer” class spacecraft). One of <strong>the</strong> most important concerns of <strong>the</strong> National<br />

Academy of Sciences Space Science Board is that NASA’s present plans for <strong>the</strong><br />

Grand Tour missions to <strong>the</strong> outer planets do not <strong>in</strong>clude a parallel program<br />

for <strong>the</strong> detailed exploration of Jupiter. <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>clusion of a cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g Pioneer<br />

program, <strong>in</strong> addition to <strong>the</strong> Grand Tour, would partially offset <strong>the</strong> nega tive impact<br />

of <strong>the</strong> cancellation of Apollo.<br />

c. Re<strong>in</strong>statement of <strong>the</strong> Orbit<strong>in</strong>g Solar Observatories I, J, and K,<br />

proposed for deletion <strong>in</strong> NASA’s FY 1973 budget proposal, and <strong>the</strong> full fund<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of <strong>the</strong> High Energy Astronomy Observatory, proposed for reduced fund<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

NASA’s budget, would demonstrate <strong>the</strong> Adm<strong>in</strong>istration’s desire to support science<br />

to a large segment of <strong>the</strong> space science community.<br />

4. <strong>The</strong> effectiveness of <strong>the</strong> above compensatory actions will depend <strong>in</strong><br />

large measure on <strong>the</strong> total budget level approved for NASA for FY 1973. Unless<br />

<strong>the</strong> NASA FY 1973 budget is essentially at or above <strong>the</strong> FY 1971 and FY 1972<br />

budget authority level of about $3.3 billion, <strong>the</strong> decision to cancel Apollo 16 and<br />

17 will be regarded by <strong>the</strong> Congress, <strong>the</strong> public, and <strong>the</strong> scientific community as a<br />

part of a general back<strong>in</strong>g away from and downgrad<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> space program.<br />

Effect of Actions on Budget<br />

<strong>The</strong> actions discussed above would result <strong>in</strong> a net reduction <strong>in</strong> NASA’s FY 1973<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imum recommended budget estimates but would not take <strong>the</strong> total estimate<br />

for budget authority below $3.3 billion, as <strong>in</strong>dicated below.<br />

[8]<br />

Budget<br />

Authority<br />

(<strong>in</strong> millions)<br />

Budget<br />

Outlays<br />

NASA FY 1973 Budget<br />

Submission—M<strong>in</strong>imum<br />

Recommended Program<br />

Cancellation of Apollo<br />

16 & 17<br />

$3,385 $3,225<br />

–133 –109<br />

Start Space Shuttle (no change) (no change)<br />

Re<strong>in</strong>state OSO-I, J, K + 20 + 15<br />

Start Pioneer Orbiter/<br />

Probes<br />

+ 15 + 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!