01.07.2014 Views

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Explor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Unknown</strong> 693<br />

It had been clear for some time that a lunar land<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> this decade could<br />

be assured only if <strong>the</strong> AS 503/CSM 103/LM 3 mission could be flown before <strong>the</strong><br />

end of 1968. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> June-July time period <strong>the</strong> projected launch date had<br />

slipped from November <strong>in</strong>to December, and <strong>the</strong> December date was by no means<br />

assured. <strong>The</strong> over-all problem was compounded by <strong>the</strong> Pogo anomaly result<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from <strong>the</strong> Apollo 6 mission, and this rema<strong>in</strong>ed a significant unknown.<br />

In this time period also <strong>the</strong> possibility of a circumlunar or lunar orbit<br />

mission dur<strong>in</strong>g 1968, us<strong>in</strong>g AS 503 and CSM 103, first occurred to me as a<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>gency mission to take a major step forward <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Apollo Program.<br />

July 20 to August 5, 1968. By now <strong>the</strong> Pogo situation looked a lot more<br />

encourag<strong>in</strong>g. MSFC had demonstrated analytically that a relatively simple launch<br />

vehicle fix was available to cure <strong>the</strong> problem. <strong>The</strong> results of many tests and analyses<br />

at MSC led to <strong>the</strong> general conclusion that <strong>the</strong> Spacecraft/LM Adapter problem<br />

would most likely be cured if <strong>the</strong> launch vehicle Pogo is cured.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> same time period, work on CSM 103 cont<strong>in</strong>ued to progress<br />

somewhat slower than expected but <strong>in</strong> a satisfactory manner. Delivery of <strong>the</strong><br />

spacecraft to KSC dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> second week of August was virtually assured. <strong>The</strong><br />

spacecraft was extremely clean. LM-3, however, required much more work at KSC<br />

than anticipated. <strong>The</strong>re was a significant number of changes <strong>in</strong> addition to test<br />

failures, requir<strong>in</strong>g trouble-shoot<strong>in</strong>g, changeouts and re test, and a serious EMI<br />

problem that cont<strong>in</strong>ued to persist. <strong>The</strong> [2] outlook for a 1968 launch, although<br />

ma<strong>the</strong>matically still possible, appeared to be very dim.<br />

August 6, 1968. Presented a long list of LM changes to <strong>the</strong> OMSF<br />

Management Council review <strong>in</strong> Houston. In collect<strong>in</strong>g this <strong>in</strong>formation it had<br />

become more and more apparent that we still weren’t quite on top of <strong>the</strong> situation<br />

and that <strong>the</strong> list of problems cont<strong>in</strong>ued to grow <strong>in</strong>stead of decreas<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

August 7, 1968. With <strong>the</strong> background of open work and con t<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

problems on LM-3 and <strong>the</strong> real concern that <strong>the</strong> mission might not be able to fly<br />

until February or March, 1969, I asked Chris Kraft to look <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> feasibility of a<br />

lunar orbit mission on AS 503 with CSM 103 and without a LM.<br />

August 8, 1968. Spent <strong>the</strong> day at KSC, review<strong>in</strong>g 503 open work and<br />

schedules with Debus, Petrone, Phillips, Hage, Bolender, and many o<strong>the</strong>rs. <strong>The</strong><br />

official KSC schedule showed an earliest possible launch date dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> first<br />

week of January, 1969; however, <strong>the</strong> EMI problem was still open. KSC po<strong>in</strong>ted<br />

out that <strong>the</strong> hardware changes were not <strong>the</strong> real cause of <strong>the</strong> problem. <strong>The</strong><br />

many retest requirements and checkout problems caused real concern. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

was little confidence <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> assembled group that <strong>the</strong> early January launch date<br />

could be met. In fact, until <strong>the</strong> EMI problem was solved, th<strong>in</strong>gs were essentially<br />

at a standstill.<br />

Steps <strong>in</strong> Plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Mission:<br />

August 9, 1968. Met with Gilruth at 0845 and reported to him <strong>the</strong> detailed<br />

status of LM-3 and CSM 103 and <strong>in</strong>formed him that I had been consider<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!