01.07.2014 Views

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Explor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Unknown</strong> 649<br />

Document II-47<br />

Document Title: Memorandum to Dr. Wernher von Braun, Director of NASA<br />

Marshall Space Flight Center, from James E. Webb, NASA Adm<strong>in</strong>istrator, 17<br />

December 1966.<br />

Source: Folder #18675, NASA Historical Reference Collection, History Division,<br />

NASA Headquarters, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC.<br />

After its budget peaked <strong>in</strong> 1965, <strong>the</strong> Apollo Program had to fight <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> White House<br />

and Congressional budget processes for <strong>the</strong> funds needed to make sure that both President<br />

Kennedy’s “end of <strong>the</strong> decade goal” was met and <strong>the</strong> program could be carried through to its<br />

planned conclusion. NASA had estimated <strong>in</strong> 1962 that 15 Saturn V launchers would be<br />

needed to ensure this outcome.<br />

Perhaps <strong>the</strong> most recognizable personality with<strong>in</strong> NASA dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> development phase of<br />

Apollo was Wernher von Braun. He was an optimist by nature, and was frequently sought<br />

out by <strong>the</strong> media for comments on Apollo’s progress. In a late 1966 <strong>in</strong>terview with <strong>the</strong><br />

magaz<strong>in</strong>e U.S. News and World Report, von Braun suggested that <strong>the</strong> first lunar land<strong>in</strong>g<br />

might come relatively early <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Saturn V sequence, with <strong>the</strong> implication that Apollo’s<br />

objectives might be accomplished with <strong>the</strong> use of less than <strong>the</strong> 15 vehicles that had been<br />

ordered. NASA Adm<strong>in</strong>istrator James E. Webb, who was work<strong>in</strong>g hard <strong>in</strong> Wash<strong>in</strong>gton to<br />

susta<strong>in</strong> support for Apollo, was not happy with von Braun’s remarks.<br />

December 17, 1966<br />

MEMORANDUM FOR:<br />

THROUGH:<br />

Dr. Wernher von Braun<br />

Director, Marshall Space Flight Center<br />

Dr. Seamans / AD<br />

Dr. Mueller / M<br />

Follow<strong>in</strong>g our recent Program Review and <strong>the</strong> exchange I had with Joe Shea about<br />

<strong>the</strong> difficulty our senior officials are hav<strong>in</strong>g susta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> credibility of <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

public statements and <strong>the</strong> Congressional testimony we gave last year when those<br />

responsible for program management were giv<strong>in</strong>g optimistic statements about<br />

<strong>the</strong> time when 504 might “well go to <strong>the</strong> Moon,” I thought we had pretty well<br />

established <strong>the</strong> policy that we would not make those k<strong>in</strong>ds of statements. I had<br />

this <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d particularly because I testified last year that we had no extra vehicles<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> program, and I made <strong>the</strong> strongest representation I know how to make <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Bureau of <strong>the</strong> Budget this year that we should not cancel any of <strong>the</strong> 15 Saturn<br />

V’s with <strong>the</strong> high risk of this program. <strong>The</strong>refore, you can imag<strong>in</strong>e my surprise<br />

when I read <strong>the</strong> U.S. News and World Report statements <strong>in</strong> your <strong>in</strong>terview. While<br />

I recognize that <strong>the</strong>y overplayed your statements, it does seem to me that your<br />

answers to <strong>the</strong> questions made it possible for <strong>the</strong>m to do so and that you could<br />

have given answers which would have made <strong>the</strong> situation clearer.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!