01.07.2014 Views

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Explor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Unknown</strong> 623<br />

(3) It may be feasible without <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g previously expected 1965<br />

budget totals for NASA because of possible offsett<strong>in</strong>g 1965 reductions that have<br />

been identified <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> regular budget review, as follows:<br />

[9]<br />

(NOA <strong>in</strong> millions)<br />

NASA estimates: MLLP All O<strong>the</strong>r Total NASA<br />

1964 4,129.7 1,220.3 5,350.0<br />

1965 4,197.5 1,377.5 5,575.0<br />

Total 8,327.2 21,597.8 10,925.0<br />

Adjustments:<br />

Possible 1965 adjustments <strong>in</strong><br />

Budget review –88.4* –313.8* –402.2*<br />

Congressional 1964<br />

reductions<br />

Restoration <strong>in</strong> 1965 for<br />

MLLP<br />

–190.0* –60.0* –250.0<br />

+190.0* - +190.0*<br />

Revised totals:<br />

1964 3,939.7* 1,160.3* 5,100.0<br />

1965 4,299.1* 1,063.7* 5,362.8*<br />

Total 8,238.8* 2,224.0* 10,462.8*<br />

________________________________________________________________<br />

*Tentative numbers; subject to change <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al budget recommendations.<br />

Recommendations<br />

(Recommendation of Director, Bureau of <strong>the</strong> Budget, and concurrences<br />

or differ<strong>in</strong>g recommendations of Secretary of Defense; Adm<strong>in</strong>istrator, NASA;<br />

Director, OST; and Executive Secretary, NASC, to be <strong>in</strong>serted after discussions)<br />

* * * * * * * * *<br />

4. Should our posture on <strong>the</strong> manned lunar land<strong>in</strong>g program attribute a<br />

greater degree of military significance to <strong>the</strong> program?<br />

Discussion: <strong>The</strong> review po<strong>in</strong>ts to <strong>the</strong> conclusions that:<br />

a. <strong>The</strong> facts of <strong>the</strong> situation justify <strong>the</strong> position that <strong>the</strong> launch vehicle,<br />

spacecraft, facilities, and general technology be<strong>in</strong>g developed by NASA <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

MLLP do have important potential future military significance;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!