01.07.2014 Views

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Explor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Unknown</strong> 527<br />

had a capability of only 82, 570 lbs. Perhaps <strong>the</strong> only comment that can be made<br />

to this is that if we can’t do any better on mak<strong>in</strong>g elementary computations of this<br />

type, <strong>the</strong>n we deserve to be <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> pa<strong>the</strong>tic situation we are. I also wonder where<br />

we will stand after NOVA is derated similarly.<br />

“Quantiz<strong>in</strong>g” bad. - One of <strong>the</strong> reasons our booster situation is <strong>in</strong> such a<br />

sad state is <strong>the</strong> lack of appropriate eng<strong>in</strong>es, more specifically <strong>the</strong> lack of an orderly<br />

stepp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>e sizes. Booster progress is virtually at a standstill because <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

no eng<strong>in</strong>es available, just as eng<strong>in</strong>es were <strong>the</strong> major pac<strong>in</strong>g item <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> development<br />

of aircraft. Aside from <strong>the</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>es on our smaller boosters, and <strong>the</strong> H-1 be<strong>in</strong>g used<br />

on <strong>the</strong> [Saturn] C-1, <strong>the</strong> only eng<strong>in</strong>es we have <strong>in</strong> development are:<br />

Capability<br />

15,000<br />

200,000<br />

1,500,000<br />

Ratio<br />

13.3<br />

7.5<br />

<strong>The</strong> attempt to make boosters out of this stock of eng<strong>in</strong>es, hav<strong>in</strong>g very large ratios<br />

<strong>in</strong> capability, can only result <strong>in</strong> boosters of grotesque and unwieldy configurations,<br />

and which require many, many <strong>in</strong>-flight eng<strong>in</strong>e starts. What is needed are eng<strong>in</strong>es<br />

which step up <strong>in</strong> size at a lower ratio. Consideration of <strong>the</strong> stag<strong>in</strong>g of an “ideal”<br />

rocket system <strong>in</strong>dicates that whe<strong>the</strong>r accelerat<strong>in</strong>g to orbit speed or to escape speed,<br />

<strong>the</strong> ratio of eng<strong>in</strong>e sizes needed is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> order of 3. Logically <strong>the</strong>n we ought to have<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>es that step <strong>in</strong> capability by a factor of around 2, 3, or 4. An every-day analog<br />

that can be mentioned is outboard motors. <strong>The</strong>re is a motor to serve nearly every<br />

need, and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> extreme cases <strong>the</strong> process of doubl<strong>in</strong>g up is even used.<br />

[7]<br />

Booster Program. - In light of <strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g paragraph, and tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to<br />

account <strong>the</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>es under development, we should add <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g two:<br />

80,000 - 100,000 H 2<br />

- O 2<br />

400,000 - 500,000 H 2<br />

- O 2<br />

This would <strong>the</strong>n give a l<strong>in</strong>e-up as follows:<br />

15,000 H/O<br />

80,000 - 100,000 H/O<br />

200,000 H/O<br />

400,000 - 500,000 H/O<br />

1,500,000 RP/O

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!