01.07.2014 Views

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in ... - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

24 First Steps <strong>in</strong>to Space: Projects Mercury and Gem<strong>in</strong>i<br />

and missile, of astronaut and capsule. Technology, or hardware, and<br />

techniques, or procedures—sometimes called “software” by hardware<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eers—both had to be developed. But because <strong>the</strong>y were equally<br />

novel, reliability had to be built <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> new tools before dexterity could<br />

be acquired <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir use. 76<br />

From <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong>refore, Project Mercury managers accepted <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegral<br />

role of astronauts <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> spacecraft.<br />

Christopher C. Kraft, Jr., Chief Flight Director for Mercury, made <strong>the</strong> case<br />

that many <strong>in</strong> NASA wanted a “go slow” approach to astronaut <strong>in</strong>tegration because<br />

“at <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> capabilities of Man were not known, so <strong>the</strong> systems had<br />

to be designed to function automatically. But with <strong>the</strong> addition of Man to <strong>the</strong><br />

loop, this philosophy changed 180 degrees s<strong>in</strong>ce primary success of <strong>the</strong> mission<br />

depended on man back<strong>in</strong>g up automatic equipment that could fail.” 77 Kraft and<br />

his colleagues came to realize that <strong>the</strong> astronauts served an exceptionally useful<br />

purpose for enhanc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> chances of success with Project Mercury. As an<br />

example, when <strong>the</strong> astronauts first visited <strong>the</strong> McDonnell Aircraft Corporation<br />

facilities <strong>in</strong> May 1959 <strong>the</strong>y reviewed progress of <strong>the</strong> capsule <strong>the</strong>y would fly with<br />

a sense for <strong>the</strong> human factors that would be necessary to make it work. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

came up with several requests for alterations—<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g an observation w<strong>in</strong>dow,<br />

manual reentry thruster controls, and an escape hatch with explosive bolts—and<br />

based on <strong>the</strong>ir recommendations NASA and McDonnell eng<strong>in</strong>eers went to work<br />

to overcome <strong>the</strong>ir concerns. 78<br />

One <strong>in</strong>cident concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> astronauts’ desire for changes to <strong>the</strong> Mercury<br />

capsule has entered <strong>the</strong> public consciousness as a representation of conflicts<br />

between <strong>the</strong> fliers and <strong>the</strong> eng<strong>in</strong>eers. One key alteration <strong>the</strong> astronauts pressed<br />

for was <strong>the</strong> addition of an observation w<strong>in</strong>dow for navigational purposes. In <strong>the</strong><br />

feature film, <strong>The</strong> Right Stuff, this <strong>in</strong>cident is depicted as a nasty confrontation that<br />

required <strong>the</strong> astronauts to threaten to appeal directly to <strong>the</strong> public through <strong>the</strong><br />

media for <strong>the</strong>ir changes to be adopted. Only <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> face of perceived embarrassment<br />

would <strong>the</strong> NASA and McDonnell eng<strong>in</strong>eers back down. 79 This adversarial<br />

approach to astronaut <strong>in</strong>volvement made for sparks on <strong>the</strong> screen, but it bore little<br />

resemblance to what actually took place. <strong>The</strong> design eng<strong>in</strong>eers work<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong><br />

spacecraft were exceptionally concerned about weight, and glass thick enough to<br />

76. Swenson et al., This New Ocean, p. 167.<br />

77. Christopher C. Kraft, Jr., “A Review of Knowledge Acquired from <strong>the</strong> first Manned Satellite<br />

Program,” MSC fact sheet No. 206, p. 1, Mercury Files, Special Collections, University of Houston-<br />

Clear Lake, Texas.<br />

78. M<strong>in</strong>utes, “Mock-Up Review,” 12–14 May 1959, with enclosure addressed to C. H. Zimmerman<br />

and George M. Low, 23 June 1959. Folder 18674, NASA Historical Reference Collection, NASA History<br />

Division, NASA Headquarters, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC.<br />

79. <strong>The</strong> Right Stuff (Los Angeles: Warner Bros., 1983). Feature film directed by Philip Kaufman<br />

and produced by Irw<strong>in</strong> W<strong>in</strong>kler and Robert Chartoff, screenplay by Chartoff. A cast of unknown<br />

actors at <strong>the</strong> time depicted <strong>the</strong> develop ment of aeronautics and astronautics from 1947 through <strong>the</strong><br />

time of <strong>the</strong> Mercury program. Scott Glenn, cast as Alan Shepard, played <strong>the</strong> astronaut perfectly, and<br />

Ed Harris as John Glenn captured <strong>the</strong> essence of be<strong>in</strong>g an astronaut. A box office hit, <strong>the</strong> film also<br />

won an Academy Award for special effects.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!