30.06.2014 Views

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter LLP Speaker 5a: 23<br />

Parker v. Milton<br />

Vermont Supreme Court 1998<br />

Holding: the residents lacked standing to bring a<br />

claim under the public trust doctrine.<br />

“Standing is not conferred on individuals merely<br />

by virtue of their status as beneficiaries of the<br />

interest protected by the public trust doctrine.”<br />

The public trust doctrine is not advanced by<br />

permitting litigants without a personalized claim<br />

to proceed.<br />

Although the residents may have legitimate<br />

grievances, their remedy is political, not judicial.<br />

7/15/<strong>2010</strong> Brian D. Israel<br />

45<br />

A <strong>Fe</strong>w Concluding Thoughts…<br />

The public trust doctrine – as the jurisprudential<br />

precursor to statutory <strong>NRD</strong> claims – presents<br />

many of the same challenges we face today.<br />

For example, the government must establish<br />

causation and injury from baseline, as in the<br />

New Jersey nuclear power case.<br />

Also, the government often has a difficult time<br />

establishing trusteeship, as in the New York City<br />

and North Dakota cases.<br />

7/15/<strong>2010</strong> Brian D. Israel<br />

46<br />

Law Seminars International | Natural Resource Damages | 07/15/10 in <strong>Santa</strong> <strong>Fe</strong>, NM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!