LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

lawseminars.com
from lawseminars.com More from this publisher
30.06.2014 Views

Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter LLP Speaker 5a: 18 Mono Lake, 2001 7/15/2010 Brian D. Israel 35 Douglaston Manor v. Bahrakis (New York Court of Appeals 1997) Salmon River, upstate New York 7/15/2010 Brian D. Israel 36 Law Seminars International | Natural Resource Damages | 07/15/10 in Santa Fe, NM

Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter LLP Speaker 5a: 19 Douglaston Manor v. Bahrakis (New York Court of Appeals 1997) Douglaston Manor, Inc. owned a 1 mile stretch of both sides of the Salmon River. Douglaston brought suit against fishing guides for anchoring along and fishing in its section of the river. Douglaston argued that its fishing rights were exclusive. 7/15/2010 Brian D. Israel 37 Douglaston Manor v. Bahrakis (New York Court of Appeals 1997) The fishing guides counterclaimed for interference with their business activities. The fishing guides argued that because the Salmon River was navigable, the state irrevocably held a public trust that protected anyone’s navigation of the river, which included a right of public fishery. 7/15/2010 Brian D. Israel 38 Law Seminars International | Natural Resource Damages | 07/15/10 in Santa Fe, NM

Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter LLP Speaker 5a: 19<br />

Douglaston Manor v. Bahrakis<br />

(New York Court of Appeals 1997)<br />

Douglaston Manor, Inc. owned a 1 mile stretch<br />

of both sides of the Salmon River.<br />

Douglaston brought suit against fishing guides<br />

for anchoring along and fishing in its section of<br />

the river. Douglaston argued that its fishing<br />

rights were exclusive.<br />

7/15/<strong>2010</strong> Brian D. Israel<br />

37<br />

Douglaston Manor v. Bahrakis<br />

(New York Court of Appeals 1997)<br />

The fishing guides counterclaimed for<br />

interference with their business activities.<br />

The fishing guides argued that because the<br />

Salmon River was navigable, the state<br />

irrevocably held a public trust that protected<br />

anyone’s navigation of the river, which included<br />

a right of public fishery.<br />

7/15/<strong>2010</strong> Brian D. Israel<br />

38<br />

Law Seminars International | Natural Resource Damages | 07/15/10 in <strong>Santa</strong> <strong>Fe</strong>, NM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!