LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf
LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf
Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter LLP Speaker 5a: 18 Mono Lake, 2001 7/15/2010 Brian D. Israel 35 Douglaston Manor v. Bahrakis (New York Court of Appeals 1997) Salmon River, upstate New York 7/15/2010 Brian D. Israel 36 Law Seminars International | Natural Resource Damages | 07/15/10 in Santa Fe, NM
Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter LLP Speaker 5a: 19 Douglaston Manor v. Bahrakis (New York Court of Appeals 1997) Douglaston Manor, Inc. owned a 1 mile stretch of both sides of the Salmon River. Douglaston brought suit against fishing guides for anchoring along and fishing in its section of the river. Douglaston argued that its fishing rights were exclusive. 7/15/2010 Brian D. Israel 37 Douglaston Manor v. Bahrakis (New York Court of Appeals 1997) The fishing guides counterclaimed for interference with their business activities. The fishing guides argued that because the Salmon River was navigable, the state irrevocably held a public trust that protected anyone’s navigation of the river, which included a right of public fishery. 7/15/2010 Brian D. Israel 38 Law Seminars International | Natural Resource Damages | 07/15/10 in Santa Fe, NM
- Page 1: L A W S E M I N A R S I N T E R N A
- Page 4 and 5: Thursday, July 15, 2010 Natural Res
- Page 6 and 7: James A. Bruen, Richar
- Page 8 and 9: Table of Contents Topic Speaker # C
- Page 10 and 11: Faculty for Natural Resource Damage
- Page 13: L A W S E M I N A R S I N T E R N A
- Page 16 and 17: James A. Bruen of Farella Braun + M
- Page 18 and 19: Richard O. Curley, Jr. of Curley &
- Page 20 and 21: David J. Lazerwitz of Farella Braun
- Page 23 and 24: John C. Cruden of U.S. Department o
- Page 25: L A W S E M I N A R S I N T E R N A
- Page 28 and 29: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 30 and 31: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 32 and 33: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 34 and 35: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 36 and 37: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 38 and 39: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 40 and 41: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 42 and 43: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 46 and 47: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 48 and 49: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 50 and 51: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 53 and 54: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 55 and 56: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 57 and 58: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 59 and 60: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 61 and 62: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 63 and 64: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 65 and 66: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 67 and 68: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 69 and 70: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 71 and 72: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 73 and 74: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 75 and 76: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 77 and 78: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 79 and 80: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 81 and 82: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 83 and 84: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 85 and 86: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 87 and 88: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 89 and 90: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 91 and 92: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
- Page 93 and 94: Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter
Brian D. Israel of Arnold & Porter LLP Speaker 5a: 19<br />
Douglaston Manor v. Bahrakis<br />
(New York Court of Appeals 1997)<br />
Douglaston Manor, Inc. owned a 1 mile stretch<br />
of both sides of the Salmon River.<br />
Douglaston brought suit against fishing guides<br />
for anchoring along and fishing in its section of<br />
the river. Douglaston argued that its fishing<br />
rights were exclusive.<br />
7/15/<strong>2010</strong> Brian D. Israel<br />
37<br />
Douglaston Manor v. Bahrakis<br />
(New York Court of Appeals 1997)<br />
The fishing guides counterclaimed for<br />
interference with their business activities.<br />
The fishing guides argued that because the<br />
Salmon River was navigable, the state<br />
irrevocably held a public trust that protected<br />
anyone’s navigation of the river, which included<br />
a right of public fishery.<br />
7/15/<strong>2010</strong> Brian D. Israel<br />
38<br />
Law Seminars International | Natural Resource Damages | 07/15/10 in <strong>Santa</strong> <strong>Fe</strong>, NM