30.06.2014 Views

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

William H. Desvousges of W. H. Desvousges & Associates Speaker 27: 3<br />

PLAINTIFF’S APPROACH<br />

The Plaintiff’s expert does an assessment of groundwater damages using REA.<br />

REA is equivalent to Habitat Equivalency Analysis (HEA) in that it is used as a tool to<br />

scale compensatory restoration using a services-to-services approach. The difference<br />

being that HEA uses a habitat metric, such as acres of land, and applies a change in<br />

services to that habitat such as a percent reduction in services as a result of an injury.<br />

REA typically uses a resource metric that has had a population or quantity change<br />

rather than a quality change as a metric. For example, an injury to a stream may have<br />

caused a reduction in the fish population. The number of fish in the stream reflects the<br />

reduction in services in the stream that resulted from a reduction in the quality of the<br />

habitat. Improvements in habitat at the site or elsewhere may increase the populations<br />

of fish and provide compensatory restoration. The number of fish produced through<br />

compensatory restoration is scaled with the number of fish lost as a result of the injury.<br />

The basis for the analysis in REA is balancing the lost services with compensatory<br />

services over time to make the public whole for the injury.<br />

However, the Plaintiff’s expert does not use REA in the usual manner. In the<br />

Plaintiff’s expert’s analysis, REA is used to equate gallons of injured groundwater to<br />

gallons of water found in preserved land. The expert does not assess the effect of the<br />

injury on groundwater services, the first step in any damage assessment. Instead, he<br />

measures the total volume of groundwater and assumes a 100 percent service loss.<br />

He then uses REA to estimate the amount of land that would contain an equivalent<br />

amount of groundwater that could be purchased for compensation. He used the<br />

average cost of acquiring land in the area multiplied by the number of acres that results<br />

from his calculations as the basis for damages. Figure 1 shows how the Plaintiff’s<br />

expert’s assessment differs from the steps used in a proper assessment.<br />

2<br />

Law Seminars International | Natural Resource Damages | 07/16/10 in <strong>Santa</strong> <strong>Fe</strong>, NM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!