30.06.2014 Views

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Allan Kanner of Kanner & Whiteley, L.L.C. Speaker 23: 55<br />

Some defendants have even gone so far as to question a state’s inherent right to protect its<br />

natural resources as a public trustee. In New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v.<br />

ExxonMobil Corporation, the defendant made the following argument:<br />

State ownership of natural resources derives from the sovereign rights of the<br />

British Crown and of the United States, and is governed by federal law, since<br />

under the equal footing doctrine these rights must be the same in all states.<br />

Plaintiffs’ expansive theories of natural resource ownership and damages go<br />

beyond the sovereign rights transmitted to New Jersey by the British Crown at<br />

independence in 1776, and would offend the equal footing doctrine if they were<br />

upheld. 217<br />

ExxonMobil essentially argued that New Jersey exceeded its authority by attempting to bring<br />

<strong>NRD</strong> claims pursuant to the New Jersey Spill Act and common law. This case is currently<br />

pending in New Jersey state court, however, given New Jersey’s historical pattern of upholding<br />

the State’s authority to bring <strong>NRD</strong> claims, it is unlikely this defense will be successful.<br />

III.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The preservation, protection and reclamation of natural resources have become<br />

increasingly more important as the devastating impact of contamination is revealed.<br />

The<br />

multiplying number of <strong>NRD</strong> cases that are filed each year serves as a testament to this fact. The<br />

process of resolving these cases will force the courts and litigants to take a hard look at the<br />

available universe of approaches. Because of the highly specific nature of each <strong>NRD</strong> case, the<br />

manner of application and the success of these claims will only be realized over time as <strong>NRD</strong> is<br />

examined on a case by case basis.<br />

217 Notice of Removal at 1.20(e), New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. ExxonMobil Corporation,<br />

No. Hud-L 4415-04 (N.J. Super. Ct. filed Aug. 18, 2004).<br />

© 53<br />

Law Seminars International | Natural Resource Damages | 07/16/10 in <strong>Santa</strong> <strong>Fe</strong>, NM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!