30.06.2014 Views

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Allan Kanner of Kanner & Whiteley, L.L.C. Speaker 23: 43<br />

Preemption of state law often arises in the context of <strong>NRD</strong> when the resource that has<br />

been injured is a navigable body of water, thus seemingly invoking admiralty and maritime<br />

issues. However, courts have consistently held that state actions are not preempted by federal<br />

law when state law does not conflict with federal law and Congress has not specifically<br />

legislated the issue. 170<br />

In general, federal environmental statutes are not enacted to supplant state<br />

statutory and common law causes of action; rather, they are meant to be supplements to ensure<br />

that trustees have adequate means by which they may seek and recover <strong>NRD</strong>.<br />

5. Scope of the Public Trust Doctrine<br />

When <strong>NRD</strong> claims are brought pursuant to the public trust doctrine, it is highly likely that<br />

a defendant will contest the scope of the doctrine’s application. As noted in section II.A.1, infra,<br />

in early American cases, the public trust doctrine was initially applied to suits involving the<br />

protection of navigable waters. 171<br />

The doctrine has evolved over time, however, and has been<br />

expanded to include the protection of, not only navigable waters, but other resources, including<br />

wildlife 172 and beaches. 173<br />

Some states have even extended the doctrine to include recreational<br />

170 In re Ballard Shipping Company v. Beach Shellfish, 32 F.3d 623, 631 (1st Cir. 1994)(holding that the Rhode<br />

Island Environmental Injury Compensation act that permits state law remedies for damage resulting from oil<br />

pollution is not preempted by federal maritime law); In the Matter of Nautilus Motor Tanker Co., Ltd., 900 F. Supp.<br />

697, 704 (D.N.J. 1995)(holding that New Jersey’s common law with respect to the recovery of purely economic<br />

losses “is not preempted as impermissibly prejudicing federal maritime law). But see State of Maryland v. Kellum,<br />

51 F.3d 1220, 1228 (4th Cir. 1995)(federal law preempts state natural resources code when it alters the rights and<br />

liabilities afforded to the parties under federal maritime law).<br />

171 For a more complete discussion of the evolution of the public trust doctrine, see generally Kanner, supra note 8.<br />

172 In re Steuart Transportation, 495 F. Supp. 38, 40 (E.D. Va. 1980).<br />

173 Borough of Neptune City v. Borough of Avon-By-The-Sea, 294 A.2d 47, 55 (N.J. 1972).<br />

© 41<br />

Law Seminars International | Natural Resource Damages | 07/16/10 in <strong>Santa</strong> <strong>Fe</strong>, NM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!