30.06.2014 Views

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Allan Kanner of Kanner & Whiteley, L.L.C. Speaker 23: 42<br />

presumption is that powers historically belonging to the states are not preempted by federal<br />

legislation unless that is the clear and manifest purpose of Congress.” 164<br />

The fact that the states<br />

have historically been entrusted with the protection of natural resources lends credence to the<br />

argument that federal laws will rarely preempt state law claims for <strong>NRD</strong>.<br />

In In the Matter of Allied Towing Corporation, a party who spilled oil into the<br />

Chesapeake Bay filed a complaint seeking limitation of liability pursuant to the Limitation of<br />

Liability Act 165 and § 1321(f) of the CWA. 166<br />

The United States responded by filing a claim for<br />

cleanup costs and the State of Virginia also responded by filing a claim seeking civil penalties,<br />

cleanup costs and damages for injury to natural resources. 167<br />

The court held that federal law<br />

does not supersede a valid exercise of a state’s police power unless there is a specific<br />

manifestation of Congress’s intent to preempt state law. 168<br />

With respect to the interaction<br />

between the CWA and Virginia state statutes, the court stated:<br />

Nothing in this scheme [of the CWA], however, conflicts with or otherwise<br />

preempts any state statute, such as Virginia’s, imposing liability on the owner or<br />

operator of any vessel which illegally discharges oil, nor does it limit the<br />

amount of liability. Similarly, nothing in the FWPCA precludes the states from<br />

imposing civil penalties upon vessel owners or operators who violate state<br />

statutes by discharging oil illegally. It merely provides the states with an<br />

alternative federal remedy which assures that, either through the action and<br />

expenditure of the state or <strong>Fe</strong>deral Government, the natural resources of this<br />

country will be preserved.” 169<br />

164 Id.<br />

165 46 U.S.C. §§ 181-189 (1976).<br />

166 In the Matter of Allied Towing Corporation, 478 F. Supp. 398, 400 (E.D. Va. 1979).<br />

167 Id. at 400.<br />

168 Id. at 401.<br />

169 Id. at 403.<br />

© 40<br />

Law Seminars International | Natural Resource Damages | 07/16/10 in <strong>Santa</strong> <strong>Fe</strong>, NM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!