30.06.2014 Views

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Allan Kanner of Kanner & Whiteley, L.L.C. Speaker 23: 34<br />

contamination through the time the resource is restored. 131<br />

Compensatory restoration is not<br />

directly defined in the statutory language of the OPA and CERCLA, although it is discussed in<br />

the regulations developed under each of these statutes.<br />

The OPA regulations, promulgated by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric<br />

Administration (NOAA) define restoration as “any action or combination of<br />

actions, to restore, rehabilitate, replace or acquire the equivalent of injured<br />

natural resources and services.” These same regulations identify “compensatory<br />

restoration” as included within restoration generally and define it as “action(s)<br />

taken to make the environment and the public whole for services losses that<br />

occur from the date of the incident until recovery of the injured natural<br />

resources.” 132<br />

Due consideration must be given to discern the unique value of the natural resources of<br />

the state. Natural resources are more than mere property claims. They are inextricably<br />

interwoven into the fabric of our ecology and the quality of our lives as we steward them from<br />

one generation of our citizens to the next. Natural resources must be valued both in the present<br />

and prospectively.<br />

If these prospective consequences may, in reasonable probability, be<br />

expected to flow from the past harm, the state is entitled to be paid for them. 133<br />

Loss of use, or<br />

benefit to polluter, both damage the people during the period of impairment and restoration.<br />

These damages should be equal to the benefit derived or savings to the parties damaging the<br />

natural resource. If, for instance, a natural resource was damaged by one thousand dollars to<br />

save or make one million dollars, this should be recaptured to the extent not otherwise covered.<br />

This item of damages forces the wrongdoer to internalize the costs of pollution by usage fee or<br />

131 43 C.F.R. § 11.83 (2005).<br />

132 See Kanner, supra note 14, at 103 (citations omitted).<br />

133 See Coll v. Sherry, 148 A.2d 481, 486 (N.J. 1959).<br />

© 32<br />

Law Seminars International | Natural Resource Damages | 07/16/10 in <strong>Santa</strong> <strong>Fe</strong>, NM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!