30.06.2014 Views

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Allan Kanner of Kanner & Whiteley, L.L.C. Speaker 23: 18<br />

by the state or federal government when valuing those resources for purposes of calculating<br />

damages. Similarly, a state’s loss of revenue derived from fishing licenses would not necessarily<br />

be a consideration by the federal government when valuing the loss of a river to pollution.<br />

4. Municipal and Local Trustees<br />

Although the federal government, state government and Indian tribes are empowered to<br />

recover <strong>NRD</strong>, prior to the SARA Amendments to CERCLA, courts broadly read the <strong>NRD</strong><br />

provision of the statute as granting municipalities standing to pursue <strong>NRD</strong> claims. 63<br />

However,<br />

with the enactment of the amendments, courts’ interpretation of a municipality drastically<br />

changed:<br />

As originally enacted, CERCLA called for authorized representatives of the<br />

state to act as natural resource trustees but did not outline a procedure for<br />

appointing such trustees. Under SARA, the governor of each state was charged<br />

with choosing an official to act on the public’s behalf as trustee and to assess<br />

damage to natural resources . . . [T]his change turned out to be significant to the<br />

courts dealing with standing for municipalities. The courts interpreted this<br />

trustee-appointing mechanism to be the only way a municipality could be a<br />

natural resource trustee under CERCLA. 64<br />

In Mayor and Council of the Borough of Rockaway v. Klockner & Klockner, the<br />

municipality filed suit under CERCLA for recovery of costs associated with the defendants’<br />

contamination of groundwater wells. 65<br />

The court ultimately determined that the SARA<br />

amendments had “clarified” the issue of standing with regard to CERCLA claims, stating that<br />

“only a ‘state official,’ specifically appointed by the governor of the state, may be an ‘authorized<br />

representative’ for purposes of bringing an action to recover for natural resource damages.<br />

63 Mayor and Board of Aldermen of the Town of Boonton v. Drew Chemical Corporation, 621 F. Supp. 663, 667<br />

(D.N.J. 1985).<br />

64 Michael J. Wittke, Municipal Recovery of Natural Resource Damages Under CERCLA, 23 B.C. ENVTL. AFF. L.<br />

REV. 921, 929 (1996).<br />

65 811 F. Supp. 1039 (D.N.J. 1993).<br />

© 16<br />

Law Seminars International | Natural Resource Damages | 07/16/10 in <strong>Santa</strong> <strong>Fe</strong>, NM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!