30.06.2014 Views

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Allan Kanner of Kanner & Whiteley, L.L.C. Speaker 23: 16<br />

The construction of federal environmental laws seems to indicate that particular natural<br />

resources are the responsibility of the federal government and other natural resources fall within<br />

the ambit of state responsibility. 54<br />

However, the language utilized in these statutes fails to clarify,<br />

for instance, whether natural resources located on federally-owned property belong to the federal<br />

government or the state wherein the property is located. 55<br />

One of the primary problems with<br />

regard to multiple trustees is linking the contamination problem of a particular resource to a<br />

particular trustee. For example, the Department of the Interior (“DOI”) and the Department of<br />

Commerce both have trustee status with regard to the protection of migratory birds. 56<br />

As a result,<br />

a state may share trustee status over natural resources when there has been an injury to migratory<br />

birds stemming from the contamination of wetlands. 57<br />

Presumably, the federal government may<br />

recover damage to the birds, while the state trustee may recover damages for injury to the<br />

wetlands, however, due to the principles prohibiting a double recovery for <strong>NRD</strong>, the two trustees<br />

are precluded from both recovering for the birds and the wetlands.<br />

While there are more attempts at coordination now, overlapping trustee authority still<br />

inhibits action. At some sites, parties have been unable to achieve prompt resolution of <strong>NRD</strong><br />

issues at the time that remedial issues are being settled with the EPA or a state, due to the need<br />

for multiple trustee signoffs. The difficulty of resolving overlapping jurisdictional issues is<br />

54 Marc G. Laverdiere, Natural Resource Damages: Temporary Sanctuary for <strong>Fe</strong>deral Sovereign Immunity, 13 VA.<br />

ENVTL. L. J. 589, 592 (1994)(“For example, under CERCLA, liability for damaging these resources is ‘to the United<br />

States Government and to any State for natural resources within the State or belonging to, managed by, controlled<br />

by, or appertaining to such State.’”).<br />

55 Id.<br />

56 Thomas L. Eggert & Kathleen A. Chorostecki, Rusty Trustees and the Lost Pots of Gold: Natural Resource<br />

Damage Trustee Coordination Under the Oil Pollution Act, 45 BAYLOR L. REV. 291, 305 (1993).<br />

57 Id.<br />

© 14<br />

Law Seminars International | Natural Resource Damages | 07/16/10 in <strong>Santa</strong> <strong>Fe</strong>, NM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!