LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf
LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf
Michael R. Thorp of Summit Law Group Speaker 19: 4 Interior: 43 C.F.R. §11.70(a) describes how the trustees are to use the baseline concept in quantifying the alleged injury: (a) Requirement. (1) Upon completing the Injury Determination phase, the authorized official shall quantify for each resource determined to be injured and for which damages will be sought, the effect of the discharge or release in terms of the reduction from the baseline condition in the quantity and quality of services, as the phrase is used in this part, provided by the injured resource using the guidance provided in the Quantification phase of h Origin of Baseline – Regulations (cont’d) 43 C.F.R. §11.72 – “Quantification phase – baseline services determination” sets forth how the calculation of baseline is actually carried out. General Guidelines Use of Historical data Control areas Resource by resource guidelines Law Seminars International | Natural Resource Damages | 07/16/10 in Santa Fe, NM
Michael R. Thorp of Summit Law Group Speaker 19: 5 Origin of Baseline – Regulations (cont’d) DOI Steps in Quantification 43 CFR 11.70(c) Measure extent of injury Estimate baseline services Determine recoverability Determine reduction in baseline services Consistent link from quantification to damages is needed Origin of Baseline – Regulations (cont’d) NOAA: “Trustees must quantify the degree, and spatial and temporal extent of such injuries relative to baseline.” 15 CFR 990.52. Law Seminars International | Natural Resource Damages | 07/16/10 in Santa Fe, NM
- Page 179 and 180: Sheri L. Moreno of General Electric
- Page 181 and 182: Sheri L. Moreno of General Electric
- Page 183: Sheri L. Moreno of General Electric
- Page 187 and 188: John K. Dema of Law Offices of John
- Page 189 and 190: John K. Dema of Law Offices of John
- Page 191 and 192: John K. Dema of Law Offices of John
- Page 193 and 194: John K. Dema of Law Offices of John
- Page 195 and 196: John K. Dema of Law Offices of John
- Page 197 and 198: John K. Dema of Law Offices of John
- Page 199 and 200: John K. Dema of Law Offices of John
- Page 201 and 202: John K. Dema of Law Offices of John
- Page 203 and 204: John K. Dema of Law Offices of John
- Page 205: John K. Dema of Law Offices of John
- Page 208 and 209: Bill Jackson of Jackson Gilmour & D
- Page 210 and 211: Bill Jackson of Jackson Gilmour & D
- Page 212 and 213: Bill Jackson of Jackson Gilmour & D
- Page 214 and 215: Bill Jackson of Jackson Gilmour & D
- Page 216 and 217: Bill Jackson of Jackson Gilmour & D
- Page 218 and 219: Bill Jackson of Jackson Gilmour & D
- Page 220 and 221: Bill Jackson of Jackson Gilmour & D
- Page 222 and 223: Bill Jackson of Jackson Gilmour & D
- Page 225 and 226: Michael R. Thorp of Summit Law Grou
- Page 227: Michael R. Thorp of Summit Law Grou
- Page 231 and 232: Michael R. Thorp of Summit Law Grou
- Page 233 and 234: Michael R. Thorp of Summit Law Grou
- Page 235 and 236: Paul D. Boehm of Exponent, Inc. Spe
- Page 237 and 238: Paul D. Boehm of Exponent, Inc. Spe
- Page 239 and 240: Paul D. Boehm of Exponent, Inc. Spe
- Page 241 and 242: Paul D. Boehm of Exponent, Inc. Spe
- Page 243 and 244: Paul D. Boehm of Exponent, Inc. Spe
- Page 245 and 246: Paul D. Boehm of Exponent, Inc. Spe
- Page 247 and 248: Paul D. Boehm of Exponent, Inc. Spe
- Page 249: Paul D. Boehm of Exponent, Inc. Spe
- Page 253 and 254: Linda R. Larson of Marten Law PLLC
- Page 255 and 256: Linda R. Larson of Marten Law PLLC
- Page 257 and 258: Linda R. Larson of Marten Law PLLC
- Page 259 and 260: Linda R. Larson of Marten Law PLLC
- Page 261: Linda R. Larson of Marten Law PLLC
- Page 265 and 266: Allan Kanner of Kanner & Whiteley,
- Page 267 and 268: Allan Kanner of Kanner & Whiteley,
- Page 269 and 270: Allan Kanner of Kanner & Whiteley,
- Page 271 and 272: Allan Kanner of Kanner & Whiteley,
- Page 273 and 274: Allan Kanner of Kanner & Whiteley,
- Page 275 and 276: Allan Kanner of Kanner & Whiteley,
- Page 277 and 278: Allan Kanner of Kanner & Whiteley,
Michael R. Thorp of Summit Law Group Speaker 19: 4<br />
Interior:<br />
43 C.F.R. §11.70(a) describes how the trustees are to<br />
use the baseline concept in quantifying the alleged<br />
injury:<br />
(a) Requirement. (1) Upon completing the<br />
Injury Determination phase, the authorized<br />
official shall quantify for each resource<br />
determined to be injured and for which damages<br />
will be sought, the effect of the discharge or<br />
release in terms of the reduction from the<br />
baseline condition in the quantity and quality of<br />
services, as the phrase is used in this part,<br />
provided by the injured resource using the<br />
guidance provided in the Quantification phase of<br />
h<br />
Origin of Baseline – Regulations<br />
(cont’d)<br />
43 C.F.R. §11.72 – “Quantification phase<br />
– baseline services determination” sets<br />
forth how the calculation of baseline<br />
is actually carried out.<br />
General Guidelines<br />
Use of Historical data<br />
Control areas<br />
Resource by resource guidelines<br />
Law Seminars International | Natural Resource Damages | 07/16/10 in <strong>Santa</strong> <strong>Fe</strong>, NM