30.06.2014 Views

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

LSI 2010 NRD Santa Fe final conference binder 072110.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Andrew O. Guglielmi of New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Speaker 8: 2<br />

assessment process in order to expedite restoration, the opportunity to bash a PRP in public or in<br />

court, and the ability to achieve their best case scenario in litigation.<br />

PRPs also have to recognize what they give up when they enter cooperative assessments<br />

with Trustees. Although PRPs would never formally waive their right to litigate on liability and<br />

defenses, by entering into a cooperative agreement, and by agreeing to pay certain past and<br />

future assessment costs, PRPs have acknowledged that they have some amount of <strong>NRD</strong> liability<br />

at a given site. Subsequently arguing liability and defenses within the cooperative assessment<br />

process serves no positive purpose. If PRPs wants to argue liability and defenses they should not<br />

enter a cooperative process and wait for litigation.<br />

Trustees have to surrender their desire to get the moon and PRPs have to admit they are<br />

not getting out of the process without doing or paying anything. Just like any marriage, you have<br />

to compromise and you don’t always get what you want.<br />

II.<br />

The Courtship – Starting a Cooperative Assessment Process<br />

The mechanism that most often commences a cooperative assessment process is not<br />

romantic. Normally, for CERCLA hazardous waste sites, it is the Trustees’ mailing of a notice of<br />

intent to perform an <strong>NRD</strong> assessment, which typically encloses the Trustees’ Preassessment<br />

Screen Determination that an assessment at a site is warranted. See 43 C.F.R. Part 11. For oil<br />

spills subject to OPA, the coordination with responsible parties is envisioned from the onset of<br />

an oil spill that has <strong>NRD</strong> implications. In fact, if Trustees elect to follow OPA regulations, they<br />

are required to invite PRPs to participate in the assessment. See 15 C.F.R. § 990.14.<br />

There are countless types of cooperative assessments and countless ways in which they<br />

can be structured, from a formal cooperative assessment agreement which covers such topics as<br />

funding, confidentiality, information sharing, and tolling provisions, to a letter or stipulation<br />

Law Seminars International | Natural Resource Damages | 07/15/10 in <strong>Santa</strong> <strong>Fe</strong>, NM<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!