30.06.2014 Views

LSI 2010 Real Estate Joint Ventures conference materials.pdf

LSI 2010 Real Estate Joint Ventures conference materials.pdf

LSI 2010 Real Estate Joint Ventures conference materials.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Donald E. Percival of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Speaker 27: 9<br />

(f) What is relationship between buyer conditions in third<br />

party offer and nature of receiving partner’s obligations to<br />

buy upon exercise of purchase rights?<br />

(i) Would receiving partner generally have benefit of<br />

same conditions following exercise of purchase<br />

right?<br />

(ii) Will interpretation of meaning of buyer’s conditions<br />

depend on external circumstances (i.e., parameters<br />

not clearly established in third-party purchase<br />

agreement)<br />

(A) Representations and warranties tied to<br />

contents of document (e.g., rent roll) not<br />

attached to third-party purchase agreement?<br />

(B) Title conditions tied to list of encumbrances<br />

accepted by third party purchaser<br />

(C) Seller’s representations deemed modified by<br />

information known to buyer<br />

3. Purchase price adjustments for actual or imputed costs<br />

(a) Assumption or payoff of liabilities (depends on transaction<br />

structure)<br />

(b) Prepayment penalties/yield maintenance fees<br />

(c) Brokerage commissions<br />

(d) Transfer taxes<br />

(e) Other closing costs<br />

(i) Title premiums<br />

(ii) Escrow fees<br />

(f) Working capital adjustments<br />

4. Breakup fees -- quid pro quo for binding third-party offer<br />

B. Practical obstacles to implementing the partners’ intentions and<br />

understandings<br />

1. Unequal access to information (e.g., initiating partner is property<br />

manager or affiliate of property manager)<br />

2. Unequal ability to perform as buyer<br />

(a) Relative net worth of initiating partner vs. receiving partner<br />

(b) Relative liquidity of initiating partner vs. receiving partner<br />

- 8 -<br />

Law Seminars International | <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> <strong>Joint</strong> <strong>Ventures</strong> and Funds | 02/09/10 in Seattle, WA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!