30.06.2014 Views

Total marine fisheries extractions by country in the Baltic Sea

Total marine fisheries extractions by country in the Baltic Sea

Total marine fisheries extractions by country in the Baltic Sea

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Total</strong> <strong>mar<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>fisheries</strong> <strong>extractions</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>country</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>: 1950-present, Ross<strong>in</strong>g, Booth and Zeller 85<br />

BALTIC SEA FISHERIES CATCHES FOR FINLAND (1950-2007) 1<br />

Peter Ross<strong>in</strong>g, Sarah Bale, Sarah Harper and Dirk Zeller<br />

<strong>Sea</strong> Around Us Project, Fisheries Centre<br />

University of British Columbia, 2202 Ma<strong>in</strong> Mall, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 1Z4, Canada<br />

p.ross<strong>in</strong>g@<strong>fisheries</strong>.ubc.ca; s.bale@<strong>fisheries</strong>.ubc.ca; s.harper@<strong>fisheries</strong>.ubc.ca ;<br />

s.booth@<strong>fisheries</strong>.ubc.ca; d.zeller@<strong>fisheries</strong>.ubc.ca<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

This study estimates total <strong>mar<strong>in</strong>e</strong> and brackish-water catches made <strong>by</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> from<br />

1950-2007. We used ICES electronic database land<strong>in</strong>g statistics as <strong>the</strong> officially-reported data basel<strong>in</strong>e,<br />

and <strong>the</strong>n added ‗adjustments‘ to reported land<strong>in</strong>gs (from various sources <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> F<strong>in</strong>nish Game and<br />

Fisheries Research Institute) as well as estimates of unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs, discards, and recreational<br />

catches. The total of <strong>the</strong>se components represents reconstructed total catches and provides a more<br />

comprehensive view of <strong>the</strong> total exploitation of <strong>mar<strong>in</strong>e</strong> resources. We believe <strong>the</strong>se estimates are<br />

underestimates due to our conservative estimation procedures. ICES land<strong>in</strong>g statistics report 4.5 million<br />

tonnes of <strong>mar<strong>in</strong>e</strong> land<strong>in</strong>gs from 1950-2007, our reconstruction estimates <strong>the</strong> total catch to be 29% higher<br />

(5.8 million tonnes). The majority of this discrepancy is due to unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs and discard<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

herr<strong>in</strong>g (Clupea harengus), while cod (Gadus morhua) catches are low compared to o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>Baltic</strong> countries.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land has recorded recreational fish<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce 1953, although it is not known whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y submit<br />

estimates of unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs or discards (o<strong>the</strong>r than seal-<strong>in</strong>duced discards). In an effort to contribute<br />

to better management of <strong>Baltic</strong> fish stocks and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> ecosystem, F<strong>in</strong>land could allocate more<br />

resources towards decreas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> amount of unreported catches and discards.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The Nordic Republic of F<strong>in</strong>land has borders with Sweden, Russia and Norway, and with Estonia to <strong>the</strong><br />

south across <strong>the</strong> Gulf of F<strong>in</strong>land (Figure 1). With a population of 5,329,000 and an area of 302,348 km 2<br />

(Anon., 2009), F<strong>in</strong>land is <strong>the</strong> third least densely populated <strong>country</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> European Union after Norway<br />

and Iceland. F<strong>in</strong>land entered <strong>in</strong>to a free trade agreement with <strong>the</strong> European Community (EC) <strong>in</strong> 1973,<br />

before experienc<strong>in</strong>g a significant economic recession <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early 1990s. F<strong>in</strong>land jo<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> European<br />

Union (EU) <strong>in</strong> 1995, however, and has s<strong>in</strong>ce developed <strong>in</strong>to a highly-<strong>in</strong>dustrialized free-market economy<br />

(Melender and Repo, 2006).<br />

F<strong>in</strong>nish <strong>fisheries</strong> can be divided <strong>in</strong>to five ma<strong>in</strong> sectors: 1) commercial <strong>mar<strong>in</strong>e</strong>; 2) commercial <strong>in</strong>land; 3)<br />

recreational or subsistence <strong>in</strong> both <strong>in</strong>shore <strong>mar<strong>in</strong>e</strong> and <strong>in</strong>land lakes; 4) small-scale <strong>mar<strong>in</strong>e</strong>; and 5)<br />

aquaculture. The recreational fish<strong>in</strong>g sector is<br />

relatively more important <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land than <strong>in</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r Scand<strong>in</strong>avian countries as about half of<br />

<strong>mar<strong>in</strong>e</strong> land<strong>in</strong>gs are accounted for <strong>by</strong><br />

recreational fishers, when herr<strong>in</strong>g catches are<br />

excluded (FAO, 2005). Aquaculture also<br />

supplies a substantial portion of fish for human<br />

consumption, particularly s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> late 1980s<br />

when <strong>the</strong> quality of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> environment and<br />

many fish stocks began to decl<strong>in</strong>e (Setälä et al.,<br />

1998). Our paper, however, will address only<br />

wild <strong>fisheries</strong> catches taken <strong>in</strong> <strong>mar<strong>in</strong>e</strong> and<br />

brackish-water.<br />

Table 1. Percent distribution (%) of F<strong>in</strong>land‘s reported<br />

land<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>by</strong> ICES subdivision, <strong>by</strong> decade. Prior to <strong>the</strong> 1980s all<br />

land<strong>in</strong>gs were reported from ICES division IIId.<br />

Percentage of catch 1980s 1990s 2000s<br />

ICES subdivision 24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!