30.06.2014 Views

Total marine fisheries extractions by country in the Baltic Sea

Total marine fisheries extractions by country in the Baltic Sea

Total marine fisheries extractions by country in the Baltic Sea

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

44 <strong>Total</strong> <strong>mar<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>fisheries</strong> <strong>extractions</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>country</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>: 1950-present, Ross<strong>in</strong>g, Booth and Zeller<br />

half <strong>the</strong> value of <strong>the</strong> first anchor po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> 1993 to land<strong>in</strong>gs of each species<br />

(Table 6). The catch rate derived for 2005 was carried forward at a constant<br />

rate for 2006 and 2007 (Table 6). L<strong>in</strong>ear <strong>in</strong>terpolations were performed<br />

between all anchor po<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />

Discards<br />

Discards were divided <strong>in</strong>to 4 categories: 1) underwater discards (mortality<br />

caused <strong>by</strong> deployed fish<strong>in</strong>g gear); ii) ghostfish<strong>in</strong>g (usually a result of<br />

entrapment <strong>in</strong> lost fish<strong>in</strong>g gear); iii) boat-based discards (a result of fishers‘<br />

selective behaviors onboard); and iv) seal-damaged discards. In Denmark<br />

however, only <strong>the</strong> first three categories were applicable because discards<br />

due to seal damage were unavailable. Discards were estimated as<br />

proportions of <strong>the</strong> total land<strong>in</strong>gs (i.e., ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs statistics +<br />

adjustments + unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs) <strong>by</strong> apply<strong>in</strong>g discard rates (%) to <strong>the</strong><br />

total land<strong>in</strong>gs of each of <strong>the</strong> applicable taxa.<br />

Underwater discards: Underwater discard rates were only applied to<br />

herr<strong>in</strong>g and sprat us<strong>in</strong>g data derived from Rahika<strong>in</strong>en et al. (2004). In <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>, herr<strong>in</strong>g and sprat are targeted <strong>by</strong> <strong>the</strong> same trawl fleet. Thus, <strong>the</strong><br />

pelagic trawl fishery is <strong>in</strong>herently mixed, and uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty exists <strong>in</strong> species<br />

composition of land<strong>in</strong>gs data (ICES, 2008c). It is also known that land<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

statistics often reflect only <strong>the</strong> targeted species (HELCOM, 2009).<br />

Rahika<strong>in</strong>en et al. (2004) presented tonnages of underwater discards <strong>in</strong><br />

relation to observed catches of herr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> trawl fishery. We derived an<br />

underwater discard rate of approximately 9% which we applied to <strong>the</strong><br />

land<strong>in</strong>gs of herr<strong>in</strong>g and sprat caught <strong>by</strong> trawl (Rahika<strong>in</strong>en et al., 2004). For<br />

<strong>the</strong> period 1950-1986, catches <strong>by</strong> gear type were not available. To estimate<br />

<strong>the</strong>se years we applied a rate of 8% which was <strong>the</strong> average of underwater<br />

discards as a proportion of total herr<strong>in</strong>g catches from 1987-1989.<br />

Table 7. Default anchor po<strong>in</strong>ts (%) based on<br />

sources (Tables 2.4.1, 2.4.5b and 2.4.20 <strong>in</strong> ICES,<br />

2008a; Table 2.4.5b <strong>in</strong> ICES, 2007) and assumed<br />

default anchor po<strong>in</strong>ts used to estimate boat-based<br />

discards for eastern cod <strong>in</strong> Denmark, 1950-2007.<br />

Year Discard<br />

Rate (%)<br />

Year Discard<br />

Rate (%)<br />

1950-1965 10.2 a 1987 5.9<br />

1966 9.4 1988 4.5<br />

1967 12.6 1989 1.9<br />

1968 8.6 1990 3.0<br />

1969 9.8 1991 2.2<br />

1970 6.8 1992 3.5<br />

1971 4.9 1993 3.5<br />

1972 12.7 1994 2.1<br />

1973 8.9 1995 1.7<br />

1974 10.5 1996 1.2<br />

1975 10.4 1997 3.9<br />

1976 2.3 1998 3.4<br />

1977 1.6 1999 2.5<br />

1978 15.5 2000 6.8<br />

1979 16.0 2001 3.2<br />

1980 3.6 2002 2.2<br />

1981 1.6 2003 2.8<br />

1982 5.9 2004 1.8<br />

1983 4.7 2005 3.0<br />

1984 2.4 2006 13.2<br />

1985 3.1 2007 11.4<br />

1986 1.2<br />

a<br />

three-year average, 1966-1968, applied as a constant.<br />

Table 6. Anchor po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>in</strong> %<br />

used to estimate unreported<br />

land<strong>in</strong>gs of herr<strong>in</strong>g, sprat,<br />

flatfishes and ‗o<strong>the</strong>r‘ taxa from<br />

1950-2007 based on sources<br />

(Tables 2.3.1 and 2.4.1 <strong>in</strong> ICES,<br />

2007a; Table 2.1.2 <strong>in</strong> ICES,<br />

2008a). Dashed l<strong>in</strong>es (-)<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicate years when l<strong>in</strong>ear<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpolations were used.<br />

Year Unreported<br />

land<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

1950 5.0 a<br />

1951-1979 -<br />

1980 10.1 b<br />

1981-1992 -<br />

1993 20.3 c<br />

1994 26.9 c<br />

1995-2003 -<br />

2004 12.3 c<br />

2005 11.2 c<br />

2006 11.2 d<br />

2007 11.2 d<br />

a<br />

assumed default (Zeller et al., this<br />

volume); b assumed default (50%<br />

of 1993 rate; see text and chapter<br />

1); c 50% of mean annual rates<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed from anchor po<strong>in</strong>ts of<br />

eastern cod, western cod and<br />

salmon; d 2005 rate carried forward<br />

as a constant for <strong>the</strong> years 2006-<br />

2007.<br />

Ghostfish<strong>in</strong>g: In a recent FAO report, lost and discarded<br />

fish gear were reported to contribute to approximately 10%<br />

of <strong>mar<strong>in</strong>e</strong> litter, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly threats to fish<br />

stocks globally (Macfadyen et al., 2009). Brown et al.<br />

(2005) reported that dur<strong>in</strong>g a 28 month study period,<br />

between 3 t and 906 t of cod were caught <strong>by</strong> lost nets<br />

(based on data from Tschernij and Larsson [2003]). When<br />

compared to <strong>the</strong> total reported or landed catch <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same<br />

area, dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> same time period, catches <strong>by</strong> lost gear<br />

were equivalent to approximately 0.01-3.2 % of <strong>the</strong> total<br />

catch of cod (Brown et al., 2005). We assumed lost gear<br />

has similar effects on all species, exclud<strong>in</strong>g pelagics<br />

(herr<strong>in</strong>g and sprat), and applied <strong>the</strong> average (1.65%) from<br />

Brown et al. (2005) to land<strong>in</strong>gs from 1950 to 2007.<br />

Boat-based discards: Discard rates for eastern cod (1966-<br />

2007; Table 7), western cod (1970-2007; Table 8) and<br />

salmon (1981-2007; Table 9 were determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Baltic</strong>wide<br />

discard statistics and Danish land<strong>in</strong>gs presented <strong>in</strong><br />

ICES stock assessment work<strong>in</strong>g group reports (ICES,<br />

2007; 2008a; 2008b). Zeller et al. (this volume) outl<strong>in</strong>es<br />

<strong>the</strong> assumed default methods used to derive discard rates<br />

from <strong>the</strong>se data for Denmark. For <strong>the</strong> years prior to those<br />

for which data were available for eastern cod (1950-1965),<br />

western cod (1950-1969) and salmon (1950-1980), we used<br />

an average based on <strong>the</strong> first three years of available data<br />

(Table 7-9).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!