Total marine fisheries extractions by country in the Baltic Sea

Total marine fisheries extractions by country in the Baltic Sea Total marine fisheries extractions by country in the Baltic Sea

seaaroundus.org
from seaaroundus.org More from this publisher
30.06.2014 Views

Catch (t x 10 6 ) Catch ( t x 10 6 ) 22 Total marine fisheries extractions by country in the Baltic Sea: 1950-present, Rossing, Booth and Zeller on the behalf of each country, as well as our estimates of IUU including adjustments derived from national datasets and ICES stock assessment reports, as well as estimates of unreported landings, discards, and recreational catches. Our total catch reconstruction adds IUU catches of approximately 12.3 million t (nearly 30%) to ICES landings statistics (Figure 6). Total reconstructed catches peaked in 1997 at approximately 1.5 million t∙year -1 , being 36% higher than the officially reported landings of 1.1 million t∙year -1 for that year (Figure 6). More recently, our estimate of total catches of approximately 1 million t∙year -1 for the late 2000s are about 32% higher than reported landings (Figure 6). The majority of IUU catches began to occur during the early 1980s, and increased dramatically in the early 1990s (Figure 7). During the period 1950-2007, IUU catches were dominated by unreported landings, which accounted for approximately 47% of our total estimate of IUU catches and represented 11% of the total reconstructed catch (Figure 7). Prior to 1991, when members of the former eastern bloc were assumed not to have unreported landings, unreported landings represented approximately 5% of our total reconstructed catch (1950-1990). After 1991, when the former eastern bloc had dissolved, unreported landings represented approximately 20% of our total reconstructed catch (1991- 2007; Figure 7). Overall, unreported landings added approximately 14% to landings presented in the ICES landings statistics by all countries for the period, 1950-2007. Discards were also signficant, representing approximately 7% of the total reconstructed catch, and adding approximately 9% to the landings officially reported by ICES (Figure 7). Discards accounted for 30% of all estimated IUU. Recreational catches represented approximately 3% of total catches for all species, and added approximately 4% to landings reported by ICES for the period 1950-2007 (Figure 7). Overall, we found herring to have the greatest total catches of all taxa in our reconstruction (Table 19). Herring catches increased from 1950 and were the dominant catch from the early 1970s until the late 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Total reconstructed catch ICES landings 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Year Figure 6. Total reconstructed catch (solid line) for the Baltic Sea Large Marine Ecosystem, as well as landings reported to the ICES landings statistics (dashed line) for the period 1950-2007. 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Unreported ICES + Adjustments Recreational Discards 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Year Figure 7. Total reconstructed catch by component, including adjustments, unreported landings, discards and recreational catches for the Baltic Sea Large Marine Ecosystem for the period 1950-2007. Table 19. Estimated total reconstructed catches (t), including landings reported in the ICES landings statistics on behalf of each of 9 coastal countries, and our estimates of IUU for the Baltic Sea LME for the period 1950-2007. Common name 1950- 1959 1960- 1969 1970- 1979 1980- 1989 1990- 1999 2000- 2007 Cod 2,042,508 2,158,775 2,663,809 4,116,265 2,210,467 1,330,000 Herring 1,954,598 2,677,685 4,286,361 4,825,795 4,462,950 2,837,924 Sprat 311,278 853,904 1,972,783 697,506 4,000,094 3,601,777 Flatfishes 204,424 292,079 273,711 233,797 337,789 313,874 Salmon 27,936 38,232 35,269 42,430 53,624 21,461 'Others' 604,107 847,254 1,046,931 712,717 816,253 571,796

Total marine fisheries extractions by country in the Baltic Sea: 1950-present, Rossing, Booth and Zeller 23 1990s, accounting for about 40% of the total reconstructed catch of all taxa between 1950 and 2007. Over the last 7 years, however, sprat catches have been larger than herring (Table 19). On a decade by decade basis, cod was consistently significant, but had not exceded herring catches since the 1960s (Table 19). The total reconstructed catches of flatfishes, salmon and ‗others‘ each represented less than 10% of the total reconstructed catch for all species (Table 19). Of the 9 coastal countries examined in detail Denmark, Poland and Sweden‘s total reconstructed catches each accounted for 17- 18% of the total reconstructed catch (1950-2007), while Finland and Germany each accounted for approximately 11% of the overall catch, and Russia and the Baltic States each accounted for less than 10% of the overall catch (1950-2007; Table 20). DISCUSSION Our reconstruction of total fisheries catches from the Baltic Sea Large Marine Ecosystem (LME) combined reported landings from ICES ‗landings statistics‘ with adjustments to landings, unreported landings, discards, and recreational catches which totaled approximately 53.5 million tonnes for the period 1950- 2007. The total catch peaked in 1997 at 1.5 million t∙year -1 and declined to a total of approximately 1.1 million t∙year -1 between 2005 and 2007. This contrasts with landings of approx. 41 million t reported by the 9 coastal Baltic Sea countries over the Table 20. Estimated total reconstructed catches (in tonnes) and the proportion (%) represented by each of 9 coastal countries considered in our reconstruction of fisheries catches from the Baltic Sea large marine ecosystem between 1950 and 2007. Country Total reconstructed catch (t) (%) Denmark 9,569,881 17.9 Poland 9,546,402 17.8 Sweden 8,879,513 16.6 Finland 5,781,000 10.8 Germany 5,758,267 10.8 Latvia 4,754,544 8.9 Estonia 4,206,072 7.9 Russia 3,739,224 7.0 Lithuania 1,243,301 2.3 entire time period. The difference of approximately 12.3 million tonnes represents an increase of approximately 30% between landings officially reported to ICES and our total catch reconstruction (1950- 2007). For the most recent period (2000-2007), the difference between reported ICES landings and total reconstructed catch was 35%. This difference is accounted for by our estimates of IUU catches for the Baltic Sea, which highlights the magnitude of fishing mortalities that are unaccounted for by records provided by countries to ICES. We believe our reconstruction not to be an overestimate, as our derivations used minimum values which were based on conservative assumptions. Therefore, our total catch reconstruction for the Baltic Sea LME represents the best currently available estimate of the total fisheries catches taken from the Baltic Sea between 1950 and 2007, and provides an improved baseline for management of fisheries resources, as well as the Baltic ecosystem as a whole. The ICES landings statistics provide only reported landings, and the ICES database presents these landings as ‗catch totals‘, meaning there is an underlying perception of equality between ‗landings‘ and ‗catches‘, clearly a flawed concept in light of known but unaccounted IUU activities. This means information on the total catches of living resources from the Baltic Sea are not readily available to the public, who are the ultimate ‗owners‘ or beneficiaries with regards to the impacts of fisheries on the Baltic Sea LME. Our catch reconstruction seeks to provide an improved dataset which is available to the general public, displaying clearly disaggregated catch data (including all IUU components) for each of the 9 coastal Baltic countries examined, representing an estimate of the likely total fisheries catches from the Baltic Sea LME from 1950 to 2007. Our total catch reconstruction for the Baltic Sea showed unreported landings of cod to be the main component of IUU (1950-2007). Unreported landings of cod peaked in 1996 at approximately 130,000 t∙year -1 and comprised about 40% of the unreported landings estimated for all taxa between 1950 and 2007. IUU fishing of cod has been an issue of great importance since cod landings peaked in the 1980s, and declined substantially in the early 1990s. Prior to 1990, unreported landings comprised approximately 5% of the total reconstructed catch (Baltic-wide), and after the dissolution of the former eastern bloc in the early 1990s, unreported landings represented approximately 20% of the total reconstructed catch. Our results indicated that the addition of underreporting in eastern bloc countries, and in particular, underreporting of cod in Poland (Bale et al., this volume), contributed substantially to this increase. Overall, our catch reconstruction indicated that Poland (Bale et al., this volume), Denmark (Bale et al., this volume) and Sweden (Persson, this volume) were responsible for the bulk of unreported landings in the Baltic Sea from 1950 to 2007. Poland and Denmark‘s unreported landings were dominated by cod, while Sweden‘s unreported landings were dominated by herring and sprat. These countries receive the largest share of the Baltic TAC for these commercial species (Anon., 2007a), implying that the responsibility for facing up to and curbing the behaviors driving IUU catches weighs heavily upon them.

Catch (t x 10 6 )<br />

Catch ( t x 10 6 )<br />

22 <strong>Total</strong> <strong>mar<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>fisheries</strong> <strong>extractions</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>country</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong>: 1950-present, Ross<strong>in</strong>g, Booth and Zeller<br />

on <strong>the</strong> behalf of each <strong>country</strong>, as well as our estimates of IUU <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g adjustments derived from national<br />

datasets and ICES stock assessment reports, as well as estimates of unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs, discards, and<br />

recreational catches. Our total catch<br />

reconstruction adds IUU catches of<br />

approximately 12.3 million t (nearly 30%)<br />

to ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs statistics (Figure 6).<br />

<strong>Total</strong> reconstructed catches peaked <strong>in</strong><br />

1997 at approximately 1.5 million t∙year -1 ,<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g 36% higher than <strong>the</strong> officially<br />

reported land<strong>in</strong>gs of 1.1 million t∙year -1 for<br />

that year (Figure 6). More recently, our<br />

estimate of total catches of approximately<br />

1 million t∙year -1 for <strong>the</strong> late 2000s are<br />

about 32% higher than reported land<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

(Figure 6).<br />

The majority of IUU catches began to<br />

occur dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> early 1980s, and<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased dramatically <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early 1990s<br />

(Figure 7). Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> period 1950-2007,<br />

IUU catches were dom<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>by</strong><br />

unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs, which accounted for<br />

approximately 47% of our total estimate<br />

of IUU catches and represented 11% of <strong>the</strong> total reconstructed catch (Figure 7). Prior to 1991, when<br />

members of <strong>the</strong> former eastern bloc were assumed not to have unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs, unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

represented approximately 5% of our total reconstructed catch (1950-1990). After 1991, when <strong>the</strong> former<br />

eastern bloc had dissolved, unreported<br />

land<strong>in</strong>gs represented approximately 20%<br />

of our total reconstructed catch (1991-<br />

2007; Figure 7). Overall, unreported<br />

land<strong>in</strong>gs added approximately 14% to<br />

land<strong>in</strong>gs presented <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

statistics <strong>by</strong> all countries for <strong>the</strong> period,<br />

1950-2007.<br />

Discards were also signficant,<br />

represent<strong>in</strong>g approximately 7% of <strong>the</strong><br />

total reconstructed catch, and add<strong>in</strong>g<br />

approximately 9% to <strong>the</strong> land<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

officially reported <strong>by</strong> ICES (Figure 7).<br />

Discards accounted for 30% of all<br />

estimated IUU.<br />

Recreational catches represented<br />

approximately 3% of total catches for all<br />

species, and added<br />

approximately 4% to<br />

land<strong>in</strong>gs reported <strong>by</strong> ICES<br />

for <strong>the</strong> period 1950-2007<br />

(Figure 7).<br />

Overall, we found herr<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

have <strong>the</strong> greatest total<br />

catches of all taxa <strong>in</strong> our<br />

reconstruction (Table 19).<br />

Herr<strong>in</strong>g catches <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

from 1950 and were <strong>the</strong><br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ant catch from <strong>the</strong><br />

early 1970s until <strong>the</strong> late<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

<strong>Total</strong> reconstructed catch<br />

ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000<br />

Year<br />

Figure 6. <strong>Total</strong> reconstructed catch (solid l<strong>in</strong>e) for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong><br />

Large Mar<strong>in</strong>e Ecosystem, as well as land<strong>in</strong>gs reported to <strong>the</strong> ICES<br />

land<strong>in</strong>gs statistics (dashed l<strong>in</strong>e) for <strong>the</strong> period 1950-2007.<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

Unreported<br />

ICES + Adjustments<br />

Recreational<br />

Discards<br />

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000<br />

Year<br />

Figure 7. <strong>Total</strong> reconstructed catch <strong>by</strong> component, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

adjustments, unreported land<strong>in</strong>gs, discards and recreational<br />

catches for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> Large Mar<strong>in</strong>e Ecosystem for <strong>the</strong> period<br />

1950-2007.<br />

Table 19. Estimated total reconstructed catches (t), <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g land<strong>in</strong>gs reported <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> ICES land<strong>in</strong>gs statistics on behalf of each of 9 coastal countries, and our estimates<br />

of IUU for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Baltic</strong> <strong>Sea</strong> LME for <strong>the</strong> period 1950-2007.<br />

Common<br />

name<br />

1950-<br />

1959<br />

1960-<br />

1969<br />

1970-<br />

1979<br />

1980-<br />

1989<br />

1990-<br />

1999<br />

2000-<br />

2007<br />

Cod 2,042,508 2,158,775 2,663,809 4,116,265 2,210,467 1,330,000<br />

Herr<strong>in</strong>g 1,954,598 2,677,685 4,286,361 4,825,795 4,462,950 2,837,924<br />

Sprat 311,278 853,904 1,972,783 697,506 4,000,094 3,601,777<br />

Flatfishes 204,424 292,079 273,711 233,797 337,789 313,874<br />

Salmon 27,936 38,232 35,269 42,430 53,624 21,461<br />

'O<strong>the</strong>rs' 604,107 847,254 1,046,931 712,717 816,253 571,796

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!